Average Throttle Position

I assume lean angles are measured from the vertical, so 30%+ is entirely possible if you are doing hairpins or pushing it on a 90+ deg turn. I’v Got to 36% on my XR and didn’t think I was pushing it and I wasn’t going fast.

Lean angles explained.
 

Attachments

  • motorcycle-lean-angle-safe-limit.jpg
    motorcycle-lean-angle-safe-limit.jpg
    48 KB · Views: 230
  • images.jpg
    images.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 242
I hit 64 degrees MotoGP lean angle on my Bandit 1250 Streetfighter once. Followed quickly by 110 degrees and a sparkler display :beerjug:
 

Attachments

  • AE.jpg
    AE.jpg
    107.5 KB · Views: 222
Its not a real street fighter .... :augie
 
Lean angles explained.
Never really looked into this. Interesting. Especially that there seems to be even more contact area at 50° than I would have ever guessed.

Not clear what distinguishes the type of bike from its lean angle? The scooter I get - small wheels, wide profile = less clearance. But surely the others are down to the rider?

Btw, saw your tyre pics in another post. Clearly you're in the GP bike category

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 
10% for me.
I'm way more interested in why I have 3500 front brake applications and 11500 rear brake applications. I only ever use the rear when I'm stopped on a hill. I know about the linked brakes but that seems like a very high ratio.

It all depends how the detection is done - I assume that the switch on the front brake lever triggers the rear brake operation - so very light touches of the front lever will activate the rear without the front doing anything??????????
 
Never really looked into this. Interesting. Especially that there seems to be even more contact area at 50° than I would have ever guessed.

Not clear what distinguishes the type of bike from its lean angle? The scooter I get - small wheels, wide profile = less clearance. But surely the others are down to the rider?

Btw, saw your tyre pics in another post. Clearly you're in the GP bike category

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk


Its a package. From steering geometry, to as you say, ground clearance, to wheel sizes.

A touring bike is designed by its very nature to give you a relaxed style of riding. Part of that package will be (again) geometry and of course tyre profile. For a road orientated touring bike, a rider would want a very neutral feel to the steering, so it neither falls in to a corner, or needs to be encouraged into a corner; neutral. So the tyre choice, its profile, the sizes of the wheels .... all designed with that in mind.

A sports bike will be designed to turn quickly. So its geometry will be different (front wheel under neath yer bollocks!), lots of ground clearance, and by choice the tyre profiles will be very different.

Take a look at the tyre below;

https://www.pirelli.com/tyres/en-ww/motorcycle/all-tyres/sheet/diablo-superbike#gallery-1

The contact patch when upright, is significantly smaller than when its leant on its ear. Thats good for track riding - it'll fall into a corner very quickly, and once there will have a large contact patch.

But this tyre would feel awful on a touring road bike. Because of the extreme profile of the tyre, it would feel (compared to what you're used to - a traditional road going touring tyre..) quite unstable and skittish when upright, and with its small upright contact patch it would react instantly to every hint of overbanding, white paint, cats eyes etc etc ... It would not steer in a nice neutral manner but would drop into a corner like a stone!

This is why I bang on about test riding bikes at your local dealer! Jumping on R1's to RT's to Electra Glides, is great for understanding how and why bike design works, and the feel you then get from geometry, engine design, etc etc ..

:thumb2
 
Its a package. From steering geometry, to as you say, ground clearance, to wheel sizes.

A touring bike is designed by its very nature to give you a relaxed style of riding. Part of that package will be (again) geometry and of course tyre profile. For a road orientated touring bike, a rider would want a very neutral feel to the steering, so it neither falls in to a corner, or needs to be encouraged into a corner; neutral. So the tyre choice, its profile, the sizes of the wheels .... all designed with that in mind.

A sports bike will be designed to turn quickly. So its geometry will be different (front wheel under neath yer bollocks!), lots of ground clearance, and by choice the tyre profiles will be very different.

Take a look at the tyre below;

https://www.pirelli.com/tyres/en-ww/motorcycle/all-tyres/sheet/diablo-superbike#gallery-1

The contact patch when upright, is significantly smaller than when its leant on its ear. Thats good for track riding - it'll fall into a corner very quickly, and once there will have a large contact patch.

But this tyre would feel awful on a touring road bike. Because of the extreme profile of the tyre, it would feel (compared to what you're used to - a traditional road going touring tyre..) quite unstable and skittish when upright, and with its small upright contact patch it would react instantly to every hint of overbanding, white paint, cats eyes etc etc ... It would not steer in a nice neutral manner but would drop into a corner like a stone!

This is why I bang on about test riding bikes at your local dealer! Jumping on R1's to RT's to Electra Glides, is great for understanding how and why bike design works, and the feel you then get from geometry, engine design, etc etc ..

:thumb2

Does this help at all I know its on the sports bike but the idea is the same.
You mention tyre profiles , the GS can have so many different profiles from the steep sided PR5 to the more rounded A41 / Tourance Next , interestingly the new TA3 has a steep profile front ( fast steering ) but a more rounded rear , this for some reason works as well as the PR5 , interestingly the Tourance with its more rounded profile and will when right over squirm a bit as the A41 do , the TA3 and the PR5 don't do this.
A chap I ride with finds the A41 front is only good for 1800 2000 ( notice first at around 1500 miles)miles as well as the side wall are low on tread depth and the tyre went off quick. Now uses the TA3 and swears by them.
Foot note : This may not apply to all riding styles ( disclaimer) other styles are allowed.:D
Weird.
 

Attachments

  • _15410.jpg
    _15410.jpg
    61 KB · Views: 191
How does it do that, then?

It's magic!
Whatever it is, it allows the rear brake to operate with the lightest of touches from the front brake lever yet requires 6" of rear brake lever travel to do the same thing.
There is some fancy ECU/ABS stuff going on.
My understanding of electronics is the same as Catweazle's.
 
Never really looked into this. Interesting. Especially that there seems to be even more contact area at 50° than I would have ever guessed.

Not clear what distinguishes the type of bike from its lean angle? The scooter I get - small wheels, wide profile = less clearance. But surely the others are down to the rider?



Btw, saw your tyre pics in another post. Clearly you're in the GP bike category

Thanks but it’s more I enjoy my time on a bike , the BM works for me and rewards everytime I go out . I ride for pleasure which is a luxury as I know some also ride as part of the daily commute etc
 
I mean, how does it know you're going to use the front brake before you actually use it? Bloody clever, eh!

The front brake lever has a micro-switch that operates before any front brake pressure is applied??????
 


Back
Top Bottom