I assume lean angles are measured from the vertical, so 30%+ is entirely possible if you are doing hairpins or pushing it on a 90+ deg turn. I’v Got to 36% on my XR and didn’t think I was pushing it and I wasn’t going fast.
I miss living in England
Never really looked into this. Interesting. Especially that there seems to be even more contact area at 50° than I would have ever guessed.Lean angles explained.

Its not a real street fighter ....![]()
10% for me.
I'm way more interested in why I have 3500 front brake applications and 11500 rear brake applications. I only ever use the rear when I'm stopped on a hill. I know about the linked brakes but that seems like a very high ratio.
Never really looked into this. Interesting. Especially that there seems to be even more contact area at 50° than I would have ever guessed.
Not clear what distinguishes the type of bike from its lean angle? The scooter I get - small wheels, wide profile = less clearance. But surely the others are down to the rider?
Btw, saw your tyre pics in another post. Clearly you're in the GP bike category
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Its a package. From steering geometry, to as you say, ground clearance, to wheel sizes.
A touring bike is designed by its very nature to give you a relaxed style of riding. Part of that package will be (again) geometry and of course tyre profile. For a road orientated touring bike, a rider would want a very neutral feel to the steering, so it neither falls in to a corner, or needs to be encouraged into a corner; neutral. So the tyre choice, its profile, the sizes of the wheels .... all designed with that in mind.
A sports bike will be designed to turn quickly. So its geometry will be different (front wheel under neath yer bollocks!), lots of ground clearance, and by choice the tyre profiles will be very different.
Take a look at the tyre below;
https://www.pirelli.com/tyres/en-ww/motorcycle/all-tyres/sheet/diablo-superbike#gallery-1
The contact patch when upright, is significantly smaller than when its leant on its ear. Thats good for track riding - it'll fall into a corner very quickly, and once there will have a large contact patch.
But this tyre would feel awful on a touring road bike. Because of the extreme profile of the tyre, it would feel (compared to what you're used to - a traditional road going touring tyre..) quite unstable and skittish when upright, and with its small upright contact patch it would react instantly to every hint of overbanding, white paint, cats eyes etc etc ... It would not steer in a nice neutral manner but would drop into a corner like a stone!
This is why I bang on about test riding bikes at your local dealer! Jumping on R1's to RT's to Electra Glides, is great for understanding how and why bike design works, and the feel you then get from geometry, engine design, etc etc ..
![]()

Even in firmer application of the front brake lever, the rear brake is applied before the front in order to promote stability.
How does it do that, then?
How does it do that, then?
Never really looked into this. Interesting. Especially that there seems to be even more contact area at 50° than I would have ever guessed.
Not clear what distinguishes the type of bike from its lean angle? The scooter I get - small wheels, wide profile = less clearance. But surely the others are down to the rider?
Btw, saw your tyre pics in another post. Clearly you're in the GP bike category
Thanks but it’s more I enjoy my time on a bike , the BM works for me and rewards everytime I go out . I ride for pleasure which is a luxury as I know some also ride as part of the daily commute etc
It's magic!
...it allows the rear brake to operate with the lightest of touches from the front brake lever yet requires 6" of rear brake lever travel to do the same thing.

I mean, how does it know you're going to use the front brake before you actually use it? Bloody clever, eh!
Your rear brake lever is obviously much more effective than mine!
![]()
Does your back brake keep going soggy like mine?