The question of ESA or not is always coming up and always will while it's an option. I like the ESA option and it's my money so I will have what I want. Then there's the complexity of ESAWilburs and ESAOhlins versus the stock ESA shocks. I know that for me it would be a sheer waste of time and money putting a set of Wilburs or Ohlins on my bike. It may make it look a bit more blinged up, but in terms of how my bike performs with me riding it, they would make no difference, make no sense and therefore a total waste of money. I know this, because my stock ESA setup has no weaknesses - for me. On my bike and with my riding style. And I do know the difference between crap suspension and good suspension - I have just forked out a load of dosh to improve the handling of my K1100RS because it was handling like a bloated whale. But on the GSA, the stock suspension just so happens to be perfect - for me. I cannot fault it in any way whatsoever. Now, the trackday and riding gods will have different views, but that's irrelevant for me as I know I won't notice any difference.
What would make me think about changing is if the shocks actually break, but I will cross that bridge if I get to it.

The stock ESA shocks work absolutely perfect for me, And i have no intention to upgrade them thanks.


Does anything show on the OBC to show that you've put the ASC on the intermediate setting?

