Thanks for the opinions chaps. I'll ponder some more whilst on my hols but a pair of aux lights of some description seems a likely result. Still undecided about the HID issue! Did anyone else think the Daniel Stern article relevant?
First thing to note: Daniel Stern is, was, and always will be totally anti HID ... his perspective is hardly a balanced one. He doesnt even think HIDs on new cars is a good thing. He has a very strongly biased position, which I have always though it hard to justify with my experience and indeed the huge majority of people who have HID lights, either factory fitted or converted.
For example, Stern argues that the whiter light colour of HIDs (does he not know that you can get a plethora of HID colours - including yellow - which are LESS white than halogens) does not make colours and objects easier to differentiate. Thats purely opinionated and not fact based, and totally in contradiction to my (and I would imagine many many others) experience.
He further fails to mention that due to 55w halogen car lamps producing less than half the visible light of 35 watt HIDs, visible contrast at much lower light levels is dramtically lower, even if the colour of the light is slightly more favourable. He is very good at arguing obsure angles that dont actually relate to reality. Yes it may well be the average halogen bulb may have a colour that offers slightly higher contrast than the average HID light ... but that's for a given level of light. What relevance is a 10% gain in contrast for a given level of light, when you actually need to be comparing it to something that offers 2.5 times the light in the first place. .... rendering his argument ridiculous and completely unrelated to a real HID vs Halogen comparison. We are not comparing a 1400 lumen halogen with a 1400 lumen HID (which is what he is effectively arguing) ... in the real world HID vs Halogen debate we need to be comparing a 1400 lumen halogen with a 3200 (or maybe even a 4600) lumen HID. So by avoiding the real world debate, his arguments are deliberately misleading.
The guy has a vested interest in selling halogen bulbs. Thats his business. The vast bulk of his anti HID comments are totally without any fact behind them and are just his opinions. You can read his opinions on every possible negative about HID light vs halogen light here
http://www.danielsternlighting.com/tech/bulbs/Hid/disadvantages/disadvantages.html ... note this page isnt about HID conversions, its about HID light full stop.
You will also note that he has no page anywhere that goes into the disadvantages of Halogen light vs HID light. And by not doing that, by only ranting about the disadvantages of one side of the story, and failing to discuss the disadvantages of halogen lights, his bias, and his agenda is clear. His website and the info on it is indeed part of the story and part of the overall picture, but it needs to be recognised as being the extreme edge anti HID position, whose information needs to be balanced and taken into account against all the pro HID information.
We all have opinions, but dont read too much into the opinions of one guy. Opinions which I would add seem contrary to the R&D teams of all the car manufacturers, not to mention people like Hella who are specialist lighting manufacturers. Does he really think Hella are developing more LED and HID automotive lighting if they are worse?