Hookster posted this in one of the other sections today. Very appropriate for this thread.
Thanks Rob, very interesting.
I suspected that they were playing with tooth design in order to produce one tooth less on the output shaft whilst keeping all other dimensions the same. Cunning stuff.
It didn't make much sense to me at the outset and I was wondering if the 'explanation' on the HPN site had lost something in the translation !
I'm glad I don't have to change the gear on the layshaft . . . I don't have a 30 ton press either (though I have been coveting a 50 ton press in my local Engineering Supplies Store

).
I don't follow your logic re. the size of the layshaft gear when driving fifth gear . .
Its simply a 'pass-through' as the layshaft speed is irrelevant.
one tooth on the input turns one tooth on the layshaft which turns one tooth on the output shaft. As only the input shaft speed (= engine speed) and output shaft speed (= drive shaft speed) matter, the layshaft gear could be any size.
It does matter on gears 1 to 4 as the drive is via the layshaft . .
Input shaft to layshaft = a fixed reduction.
Layshaft to output shaft = a further reduction depending on which cluster is engaged.
Or is there something else I don't understand ?
Thanks for all your help, its been very educational.
I hope all the others think so too
Bob.