Fastest bike a WC or a Ducati 1199 Panigale

What would you fancy it on ?

..... :D

Or failing that a bike that is lighter, smaller, simpler/easier to fix and far, far cheaper. It's a bit academic though because I don't have a wish to go round the world on a bike currently.
 

Attachments

  • NEWELLthe2011luxurycaravansdesignbynewells_thumb1.jpg
    NEWELLthe2011luxurycaravansdesignbynewells_thumb1.jpg
    72.6 KB · Views: 323
Ive been on track on a hexhead GS few times. Quite good fun. Dont think the WC GSA on anakees will be as good though. A bit too big. Still doable though but I wouldnt call it fun.

Im at Cadwell toorrow for the last track day on my S1000R.

Its really all about the rider, two equal riders, one on a panigale and one on a GS the panigale will murder it no doubt. Just the tyres will make a massive massive difference.
 
For a given bend radius and speed all bikes will lean at the same angle. Moped or Goldwing all the same. Wide tyres can cause a steeper lean angle as the contact patch moves towards the c of g.
Re GS should be able to brake later as forks don't need to settle but Panigale will change direction faster and probably lean further before something expensive happens.

MCN ran a hexhead RT around a track against an RGV 250. They had similar power to weight but obviously the porker RT would be blown into the weeds.

Lap times were virtually identical.
 
What would you fancy it on ?

First try to ride it coast to coast. An epic story well worth a read and featured in a local magazine.

http://advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=808437&highlight=supermodel

Swartkopz, a brilliant short circuit and it delivers some good racing. You can get a lot more brakes by just switching the ABS off but good going to keep up with a 1199, the difference in bikes will be more evident on a wider and longer circuit where the 1199 can really stretch its legs. Looks like there was a bit of rain earlier that evening.
 
For a given bend radius and speed all bikes will lean at the same angle. Moped or Goldwing all the same. Wide tyres can cause a steeper lean angle as the contact patch moves towards the c of g.
Re GS should be able to brake later as forks don't need to settle but Panigale will change direction faster and probably lean further before something expensive happens.

MCN ran a hexhead RT around a track against an RGV 250. They had similar power to weight but obviously the porker RT would be blown into the weeds.

Lap times were virtually identical.

Interesting that but the panigale is no rgv 250 with 40 hp.
There is no way on earth a gs will be able to brake later than a sports bike. So much against it- weight- feel for grip from the front- tyres. No slipper clutch. I could go on.

Again it's all about the rider. I think 80% rider 20 bike. The gs is a great bike but get equal skilled riders on these very different bikes to panigale will win every time. Road or track. But for a tour of the alps I know which one I want to be on- I won't mention off road!
 
For a given bend radius and speed all bikes will lean at the same angle. Moped or Goldwing all the same. Wide tyres can cause a steeper lean angle as the contact patch moves towards the c of g.
Re GS should be able to brake later as forks don't need to settle but Panigale will change direction faster and probably lean further before something expensive happens.

MCN ran a hexhead RT around a track against an RGV 250. They had similar power to weight but obviously the porker RT would be blown into the weeds.

Lap times were virtually identical.

Sorry but nearly all of this is nonsense. Actually rereading it every 'fact' you state is incorrect.
 
For a given bend radius and speed all bikes will lean at the same angle. Moped or Goldwing all the same. Wide tyres can cause a steeper lean angle as the contact patch moves towards the c of g.
Re GS should be able to brake later as forks don't need to settle but Panigale will change direction faster and probably lean further before something expensive happens.

MCN ran a hexhead RT around a track against an RGV 250. They had similar power to weight but obviously the porker RT would be blown into the weeds.

Lap times were virtually identical.

You are forgetting two fundamental aspects.

Weight of bike
coefficient of friction of the tyres

Therefore the above statement is incorrect
 


Back
Top Bottom