hello
can you please help me decide between these two bikes please?
one is a 2000 model with 39k kms and never been restored, some rusted bolts and some traces of rust on handle bar and rear frame etc...
the other is a 2001 model with 25k kms.
i had seen the bike before the renovation/restoration, it was stored in a humid garage and had some corrosion in the usual places, especially the fork legs.
the bike now is close to mint the owner is a friend of mine and he spent four months stripping the bike and renovating each part.
what do you think please?
would you prefer a more genuine example with patina on or else a restored one?
thank you
can you please help me decide between these two bikes please?
one is a 2000 model with 39k kms and never been restored, some rusted bolts and some traces of rust on handle bar and rear frame etc...
the other is a 2001 model with 25k kms.
i had seen the bike before the renovation/restoration, it was stored in a humid garage and had some corrosion in the usual places, especially the fork legs.
the bike now is close to mint the owner is a friend of mine and he spent four months stripping the bike and renovating each part.
what do you think please?
would you prefer a more genuine example with patina on or else a restored one?
thank you


