dave perry
Registered user
Up from 92.8 to 96.5 BHP ? now that sounds like a waste of money - my rear wheel figure went from 78.5 to 101 !! Torque upped from 62.8 ft/lb to 76.9 !!
Up from 92.8 to 96.5 BHP ? now that sounds like a waste of money - my rear wheel figure went from 78.5 to 101 !! Torque upped from 62.8 ft/lb to 76.9 !!
Two cylinder set up, each cylinder done separately. Cost £200 plus the cost of the PCV which I bought myself, was £224, so £424 total. More expensive but I have the PCV which I can remove if I want and get most of my money back. Hilltop...........£350 gone for ever.Delboy, how much as that set up and Dyno time cost you, just so we all have the full comparison?
Sent using Tapatalk
"Now having spoken to the operator im glad I didn't throw my money away on what appears to be a sham ECU setup at Hilltop. I speak as I find and the dyno guy has had three bikes on his dyno after the so called set up there and every one of them had been given wrong figures. And the proof exists on the dyno graphs from those bikes, ive seen them. Now believe me if you like but quite frankly i don't really care whether you do or not, its your money not mine."
The anecdotes from the dyno guy are hardly "speaking as you find"
Glad you are happy with the change in performance you have, though.
Al
I'm not sure, from what little I know of it, how a dyno operator "somewhere" can look at somebody else's figures & declare them a "sham". Isn't it all about, as much as possible, the before & after on the same dyno, same day, same operator ? I'd be more interested if "dyno guy" compared any other set up on stoichiometric ratio, & pointed out any difference. After all, the correct AFR is what I think most customers are after. If one dyno shows "90 BHP becoming 100BHP" whilst another shows it as "94BHP becoming 104BHP" that's not really advancing the matter. If however they both show a weak mixture becoming a correct mixture, or not, throughout the rev. range, that's the important bit, IMO.
The said bikes were run on his dyno, and that's how he knows. The claims about figures were outrageous compared to the figures obtained on his dyno when running the bikes on his one. Further more ive seen the AFR figures and the graphs obtained on his dyno and they were shocking compared to the claims made by the other "tuner".
Hilltop...........£350 gone for ever.
My point entirely. Different dyno/operator, different day, different weather even - & you know your man is the purveyor of "the truth", how exactly ?
I'm not saying who's right or wrong. I'm saying you haven't proved anything.
we all know the answer to this thread..someone who has been to hilltop needs to take his bike to a local dynojet center....watch this space![]()
surely all the WSBK and BSB teams would be doing it ?

The Tyco Suzuki's where on Geoffs Dyno last year![]()
If you read my post earlier you would see that in fact THREE bikes that had been to Hilltop had indeed been to the dynojet centre and the figures obtained were so wildly off kilter as to make them completely unbelievable
Exactly what does that prove ?

Two cylinder set up, each cylinder done separately. Cost £200 plus the cost of the PCV which I bought myself, was £224, so £424 total. More expensive but I have the PCV which I can remove if I want and get most of my money back. Hilltop...........£350 gone for ever.
Opinions are like arseholes..............everyone has one, and is entitled to them.