MRA is a piece of piss to use for route planning and navigation, the former it is excellent - and there is a free version which works quite well
With the full version I will do the "compare route with" option to overlay Tom Tom and OSM routing - but these are not 100% true to Tom Tom as each device generation may behave a little different, then the maps may be different, or even software updates that have altered the routing calculations, before we get into avoidances, curvy road options, live traffic and a billion other things.
But by doing the compare I may spot a few places where other devices are likly to deviate from mine and dob a couple of extra waypoints in to get them on the same page.
Tracks are my best friend, I use the route for navigation, and show the track as that is what I saw on the computer screen, so when they deviate I can make a decision as to which looks the nest option, when riding with the Mrs we had an agreement if we could not see one another and the track / route deviated always follow the track.
I may also load the route onto the XT, then show the track, then look at the route on the XT - easy to spot where it deviates from the track (which is what I intended when planning on PC) I can then ammend the waypoints and check it again - for a trip with several bikes getting into this level of detail can pay off on the trip - but you will never catch everything if you have 5 bikes with 5 different Nav devices / apps and not all can run tracks - and some have waypoint number limitations so you cannot just expand to 100 waypoints.
I do not navigate the track as I like to use Waypoints for where there is fuel / food / something interesting, and all that gets lost with a track.
Solo without any particular stops none of this matters much as you can just follow the route, or the track,
=======
I have cut this post out of an another thread, as it probably stands better on its own. Hopefully, it will create some debate.
Richard
With the full version I will do the "compare route with" option to overlay Tom Tom and OSM routing - but these are not 100% true to Tom Tom as each device generation may behave a little different, then the maps may be different, or even software updates that have altered the routing calculations, before we get into avoidances, curvy road options, live traffic and a billion other things.
But by doing the compare I may spot a few places where other devices are likly to deviate from mine and dob a couple of extra waypoints in to get them on the same page.
Tracks are my best friend, I use the route for navigation, and show the track as that is what I saw on the computer screen, so when they deviate I can make a decision as to which looks the nest option, when riding with the Mrs we had an agreement if we could not see one another and the track / route deviated always follow the track.
I may also load the route onto the XT, then show the track, then look at the route on the XT - easy to spot where it deviates from the track (which is what I intended when planning on PC) I can then ammend the waypoints and check it again - for a trip with several bikes getting into this level of detail can pay off on the trip - but you will never catch everything if you have 5 bikes with 5 different Nav devices / apps and not all can run tracks - and some have waypoint number limitations so you cannot just expand to 100 waypoints.
I do not navigate the track as I like to use Waypoints for where there is fuel / food / something interesting, and all that gets lost with a track.
Solo without any particular stops none of this matters much as you can just follow the route, or the track,
=======
I have cut this post out of an another thread, as it probably stands better on its own. Hopefully, it will create some debate.
Richard
Last edited by a moderator:


