God gave us two feet. Plant them with pride and enough of all this poncy shit.


For 45 minutes you can do the footie stuff and stick to "the rules". I'm sure you've come across some, where that is all they want to achieveIs that it ??!! Is that the pinnacle of bike riding? An IAM pass??!!
Or is there more to being a good rider than a 45 minute test??!!
![]()
God gave us two feet. Plant them with pride and enough of all this poncy shit.![]()


SILENCE!
When working with my own associates, I don't worry about it except for asking them to think ahead when approaching a give way, stop or whatever. Plus of course, having your right foot covering the brake gives you far better low speed control and stability and having your feet dangling about is unsafe and looks crap!God gave us two feet. Plant them with pride and enough of all this poncy shit.![]()
Some of us are petiteGod gave us two feet. Plant them with pride and enough of all this poncy shit.![]()

Let’s throw another point in for discussion.
So yesterday I did my pre test with a different observer, and within 10 miles I could see things weren’t going to be good...
So when we stopped about 30 miles in, I took the bull by the horns and said ... I know what feedback your going to give... he looked shocked and taken aback.
See from my first ride with IAM, I was pulled for slowing for a change in speed limits .. ie 60 to a 30, I would roll off and be at the 30 without using brakes..... no no no I was told ... you need to make progress and brake safely for the 30. So over the last 5 rides I’ve changed my approach.
So back to yesterday... first time I did this, I could see my pre test observer was well back from me on every speed limit change ... because he was rolling off.
When I told him that’s what I’ve been told to adopt.. he was shocked and even surprised when he saw the note in my book!
So I’ve asked them both to discuss and give me a definitive answer before my test.
Can’t be right to have this fundamental difference on a system of riding.
Let’s throw another point in for discussion.
So yesterday I did my pre test with a different observer, and within 10 miles I could see things weren’t going to be good...
So when we stopped about 30 miles in, I took the bull by the horns and said ... I know what feedback your going to give... he looked shocked and taken aback.
See from my first ride with IAM, I was pulled for slowing for a change in speed limits .. ie 60 to a 30, I would roll off and be at the 30 without using brakes..... no no no I was told ... you need to make progress and brake safely for the 30. So over the last 5 rides I’ve changed my approach.
So back to yesterday... first time I did this, I could see my pre test observer was well back from me on every speed limit change ... because he was rolling off.
When I told him that’s what I’ve been told to adopt.. he was shocked and even surprised when he saw the note in my book!
So I’ve asked them both to discuss and give me a definitive answer before my test.
Can’t be right to have this fundamental difference on a system of riding.
Let’s throw another point in for discussion.
So yesterday I did my pre test with a different observer, and within 10 miles I could see things weren’t going to be good...
So when we stopped about 30 miles in, I took the bull by the horns and said ... I know what feedback your going to give... he looked shocked and taken aback.
See from my first ride with IAM, I was pulled for slowing for a change in speed limits .. ie 60 to a 30, I would roll off and be at the 30 without using brakes..... no no no I was told ... you need to make progress and brake safely for the 30. So over the last 5 rides I’ve changed my approach.
So back to yesterday... first time I did this, I could see my pre test observer was well back from me on every speed limit change ... because he was rolling off.
When I told him that’s what I’ve been told to adopt.. he was shocked and even surprised when he saw the note in my book!
So I’ve asked them both to discuss and give me a definitive answer before my test.
Can’t be right to have this fundamental difference on a system of riding.
God gave us two feet. Plant them with pride and enough of all this poncy shit.![]()


But can you shake it all about ???This advanced stuff must be pretty easy, so I can’t be arsed with it - don’t see what all the fuss is about.
A friend of mine (late 30s) took up motorcycling about two years ago having never ridden a motorcycle in his life before, he passed his IAM test about a year ago with a 1st Class pass and a couple of months ago got a Rospa Gold pass, both at the first attempt. He nearly always puts his left foot down, I think he’s wrong as I nearly always put my right foot down![]()

This advanced stuff must be pretty easy, so I can’t be arsed with it - don’t see what all the fuss is about.
Is that a quote from Merseyside Police driving school? We were poetry in motion when we did our escort duties, ask 'kenny'![]()



.. as I’m being told by my instructor that under no circumstances must you exceed the speed limit, dropping back would be my only option.
So you're on a duel carriageway overtaking a Merc Sprinter which increases it speed to 70mph and you're alongside it.
What's the safest course of action?
This will be taken into account by any examiner, but like I've already said, how did you find yourself in this situation?
1. Slow down in the overtaking lane, before dropping back into the LH lane where you'll need to account for who's behind you now and who is to your left?
2. 'Keep' accelerating past the Merc before dropping back into the LH and gradually reducing your speed to the legal limit?
I've been an instructor for 12 years and would always advise to take the safest course of action even if that does mean travelling over the speed limit for a short distance![]()
I would accelerate past, but if the Sprinter you are passing continues to accelerate, then when you pull in, he will be pushing you along. I would never put myself in danger because of speed, bit like if your on a motorway doing 70, outside lane and passing traffic, behind you and approaching fast is a car going well over the speed limit. I would accelerate so as not to hold the vehicle up, but drop back to 70 once past.
So you're on a duel carriageway overtaking a Merc Sprinter which increases it speed to 70mph and you're alongside it.
What's the safest course of action?
This will be taken into account by any examiner, but like I've already said, how did you find yourself in this situation?
1. Slow down in the overtaking lane, before dropping back into the LH lane where you'll need to account for who's behind you now and who is to your left?
2. 'Keep' accelerating past the Merc before dropping back into the LH and gradually reducing your speed to the legal limit?
I've been an instructor for 12 years and would always advise to take the safest course of action even if that does mean travelling over the speed limit for a short distance![]()
