JohnGS1100 Tuning Chip

Maybe I do have a limp wrist,:eek:
But I do consider myself to ride quite smoothly,
Especially two up.
I have noticed and chatted to you about my bike pinking under low rev high load,
So maybe the s8 chip has more midrange advance or just as likely my timing is a bit advanced,as I did fit some new hall sensors and have never bothered to actually strobe and check the base timing :blast
Might be a good idea to actually check it:augie
Edit,I was a bit concerned about the pinking when touring in the alps etc,low speed hairpins etc,but never got round to checking timing,it's on the to do list

Check your injectors. Had a pinging problem (albeit on WOT) on mine eventually replaced the tb's with a matched pair solved instantly.
 
Thanks for report !!

If your R1100R has lambda the correct CCP is 30,87,87a.
But if your have too co-pot you can try the CCP 30,87a and just adjust the co-pot.
I think it is better no surge and richer afr at all revs of rpms.

H John,
My US bike does have lamba but the cat is removed and the O2 sensor still in place; no co-pot. 30, 87. 87a is the stock setting with the pink ccp plug in place. Pops pretty bad with the ccp in without a cat and either the stock chip or your stage 7. Either chip settles down if I just jump 30,87a. Bike runs fine this way....think I'll leave it that way unless some other combination is known to work better.
 
Chip

Hi John,

Received my updated chip today, quick service, not tested it on the bike yet, its minus temperatures here at the moment. But I've been very pleased with all your other chips I've had.
Will report further when I've fitted and ridden.

Thanks.
 
thanks Dwaine - to show my age: (see post above)
``bike does have lamba but the cat is removed and the O2 sensor still in place; no co-pot. 30, 87. 87a is the stock setting with the pink ccp plug in place.
Pops pretty bad with the ccp in without a cat and either the stock chip or your stage 7.
Is that even English?:/
if this ccp thing makes your dad poorly, I`m not getting one........................
 
No needed to change the CCP, the cat does no matter. If the lambda is connected the correct CCP is 30,87,87a
 
OK John. I couldn't wait until spring so went for a short 20 mile ride after putting the CCP back in. Nearly froze and no one else out, besides some elk hunters, and I couldn't get the bike to backfire anymore (or pop; I'm bilingual---English English and US English and I'm old) even with some aggressive downshifting and engine braking. Maybe the bike learned or maybe an air leak in the newly installed exhaust closed up but the bike ran beautifully. I will simply say the bike runs much smoother throughout all rev ranges. I had a friend at our monthly BMW lunch meeting try the bike through some twisties on the way home and he said the bike pulls pretty much like his 1200GS. Whatever, all pretty subjective stuff but I love what your chip has done for the bike. Thanks.
 
nobody got my joke?
pops-usa=father-England -
bad = poorly - yorkshire
pops pretty bad = father poorly
never mind............
 
It may have been covered before, but, I am planning a trip with a few friends to Africa next year. I have a stage 10 chip fitted so do i need to change this if i am going to be travelling where the fuel quality wont be as good?

Thanks
 
You can fit a wire or cable to connect the pin 86 to CCP. So you can burn low octane petrols by the stage 10 chip.

10590562_373070676186568_5230230818115340553_n.jpg
 
John,
I guess we have to ignore: that the two dyno runs were done on different dynos, that there is no rpm axis on the upper chart, and that the torque units are different between the two runs. It also appears that the second dyno run software used curve-smoothing.

Your "improved" version has a peak torque at 6000 rpm of slightly less the 8 m-kg. The BMW spec for a stock F800GS is 8.2 m-kg.

Peak HP stock per BMW is 85 HP at 7500 rpm. Your "improved" bike shows 80 HP. It looks like you HP increase is mainly due to increasing the RPM limit.
 
Yes Roger it is different dyno. Also the dyno is from rear whell.

The first is from stock F800 and the second is after reprogramming. The bike now it is very stronger and the torque is up to 6 Kgr from 2.000 rpms. Also the power and the final speed is much more up (about +10 Hp) at the top end.
 
Quick question please I'm just fitting this new chip.

Can anyone tell me which way the arrow on the new chip should face ?

Inward or outward ?

Ta
 
Ok quick update to my above post and pleased to say all fitted and working.

Its a stage 9 chip fitted to my 2005 1150 GSA with decat and Remus.

Just done approx. 50 miles on mixed roads and very pleased :thumb2

Shes a lot smoother throughout the gears and pulls a little harder throughout the revs, so I just need to monitor mpg over next few weeks.

Otherwise all good thanks John :beerjug:
 


Back
Top Bottom