mateyboy
Guest
Well, it is here, 36 miles after an hour tootling round Rotherham & Sheffield rush hour I've not gone much above 4000 rpm and gone up and down gears, up and down hills and it feels as smooth as u like. Another very happy bunny!
To be frank, boxers need some time to loosen up. I'm on my second 1200, and they both started revving freely around 30000km/20000miles.
)....
What I can't get my head around is that people go against the recomendations. I don't know much about the mechanical aspect of cars and bikes, I just love to ride/drive them. But surely the people who build them know what's best for them? They spend a small fortune on R&D to find out what works, and what doesn't.
...




I tend to agree with the views on that site. I rode mine normally (like I stole it) right from the start as I had heard that the boxer engines like a hard run in for the rings. It has never missed a beat and uses stuff all oil, unlike some.
Engine overstressing originates from mainly 2 actions: Overrevving (banging on and beyond the red line for extended periods of time) and underrevving (asking the engine to drive in too high a gear where every unit of work produced is shared by fewer cycles).
In normal life, either of the above actions have no significant effect on the life expectancy
Interestingly, a couple of years back when I picked up my car with a pretty highly stressed (100bhp/litre) complex (modern V8) high revving (8k redline) engine, the official advice was to not rev it when cold. That was it. In my first drive home, once the display told me that it was warm enough, which happened 100 metres out of the dealership, (as it had been warming up during my walkaround with the dealer), that was it, I could rev it and load it as hard as I wanted.
I'm not sure what it is about the GS that suggests that it really needs babying so much for the first (suspiciously round number of) 1000km.
http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm
Of course I understand that. I often use the same argument to people who muck about with their brilliantly engineered, say, Fireblade, and tell them exactly that - 'Honda have spent billions of pounds researching and making this so why stick that crappy exhaust on it and muck up its air flow, fueling etc etc'.
I guess the answer to your question is the massive can of worms that you would open, telling people to drive / ride their new machine hard for the first thirty miles. Any breakdown, accident, incident in an unfamiliar vehicle en route home from the dealer would instantly be bounced back to the manufacturer as their fault. Can you imagine the litigation that would follow - 'but the book said do this ....'. So much easier to write take it easy for the first so many thousand miles.
The motoman stuff makes perfect sense to me. I can exactly see how bimbling about for weeks on end is going to glaze yer bores and pistons, make a poor seal etc etc.
Feck it!!! I'm going to buy oil and filter from the dealer, and sensibly, logically and with a degree of purpose and forethought, work the engine hard in a smooth controlled no mega high revs way.
I'll let yer know if it breaks!!!!!![]()


Have just read the owners manual for the 2010 GSA, Bmw now encourages you to ride it hard from 200km and redline it from 600km, but the dealer told me to forget that and run it in just like my 2008 GSA, so who is right and who is wrong.
So you treat it with kid gloves for a 1000 miles then when you have done a 1001 miles the engine goes through " a strange transformation period" and then its ok to scream the nuts off it............yep for sure it all changes in that last 1 mile![]()