Not looking too good for Croft

Mort

Registered user
Joined
Apr 22, 2005
Messages
11,297
Reaction score
1
Location
County Durham
Organisers at Croft circuit, near Darlington, fear that if a recent court decision is not overturned, the famous circuit could soon face closure.

A family living next to the track reportedly won a case forcing Croft's owners to pay £150,000 compensation, as well as an estimated £700,000 in legal costs. The damages were apparently for loss of quality of life that the family's barristers claimed had been caused by the noise of cars on the circuit.

Interestingly, the complaint was not about organised race events, which only take place on approximately 50 days each year, but instead regarded vehicle testing days and open track days.

Organisers at Croft fear that if this decision is upheld, many similar cases will follow, and the financial blow could prove fatal. An appeal against the decision was heard last week at the Court of Appeal in London, but as yet no decision has been reached.

Meanwhile, the family concerned also attempted to gain an injunction restricting activity at Croft to just 40 days-per-year. The judge is said to have refused this request, but the claimants are cross-appealing this decision.

Croft circuit grew out of a disused RAF base first raced on in the 1920s, before being used by the airforce again in World War 2. Since then it has grown into an world-famous racing circuit, hosting various club events, as well as British Touring Car Championship and British Superbike Championship rounds.

The circuit generates an estimated £3m a year for the local economy, with its visitors bringing activity to local businesses.

Dennis Carter, director of organising body Croft-Promo-Sport, told The Northern Echo: 'Our future really depends on what the court decides. I do not want to sound too alarmist because I would like to think we can still find a way through this. The people at Croft do a fantastic job for us and I would really like it to continue.'
 
now you see I would kill to live near a motor circuit ........and you get these selfish barstewards who complain.....move away ya' dumb idiots.....:rob
 
now you see I would kill to live near a motor circuit ........and you get these selfish barstewards who complain.....move away ya' dumb idiots.....:rob

It seems the people they're up against are the inlaws of the circuit owner....and he gave them the house before he divorced his wife:blast
 
Croft looks set to face closure after losing its appeal against an decision to award local residents damages for noise pollution – and to add insult to injury, the track has been told it can only hold 40 "noisy" days per year.

Residents Derek and Julia Watson, and their daughter Jill, live within 300 yards of the Darlington track and reckon their lives have been disrupted by "loud, intrusive and repetitive noise".

A statement from Croft circuit this afternoon said:"Croft Promosport Ltd is extremely disappointed with the Court of Appeal's decision today in relation to the recent High Court Judgment, which has serious implications for the circuit and the motor racing industry generally. We are reviewing the position carefully and would not wish to make any further comment at this stage."

In April this year, they were awarded a total of £149,600 in damages. Today in the Appeal Court, Judge Sir Andrew Morritt said he could find no legal flaw in the earlier decision and that it was illogical to deny the trio an injunction to limit the track to 40 days of noisy activity. However, the granting of the injuction will reduce the damages payable.

Track owners Croft Promo-Sport were also denied permission to appeal to the House of Lords and were instructed to pay £120,000 in legal costs immediately. This is a fraction of the Watsons' reported £700,000 legal bill.

The objection by the Watsons and Ms Wilson was not to car and motorbike racing events, which take place on the track on about 45-50 days-a-year, but to "vehicle testing days" and "track days", when members of the public drive cars around the track all day long at high speed.

The ruling sets a dangerous legal precedent which leaves the track open to law suits from residents who are within earshot of the circuit.

More dangerously, however, it leaves any motorsport facility open to legal action of the same nature. Not good.
 
Racing circuit bosses are believed to be holding crisis talks at the end of this week to discuss the implications of the Appeal Court's decision to award damages against Croft Promosport for making a noise.

The Association of Motor Racing Circuit Owners, which includes Donington Park, Brands Hatch and Silverstone, will meet to decide how to proceed, given the legal precedent that has now been set.

The ruling against Croft on Monday morning has opened a massive can of worms and gives anyone who is within earshot of a race track the chance to sue for damages.

This could, of course, prove fatal to not only racing on four wheels and two in the UK, but also to trackday companies and corporate motorsport firms.
 
Bloody typical NIMBY muppets sounding the death knell for trackdays. Still there's always the opportunity to go back to the roads. Nice and safe for everyone then.
 
In my opniion it's very simple.

Was the facility being used as a race circuit before the complainants moved in?

If it was then there is no case. They choose to live beside a race track they must take personal responsibility for their decision.

This is a perfect example of how ridiculous the legal system in this country has become.

No wonder intelligent folk are bailing out by the thousand.
 
In my opniion it's very simple.

Was the facility being used as a race circuit before the complainants moved in?

If it was then there is no case. They choose to live beside a race track they must take personal responsibility for their decision.

This is a perfect example of how ridiculous the legal system in this country has become.

No wonder intelligent folk are bailing out by the thousand.

My thoughts entirely, it's the same when someone moves next to the church and complains about the bells or the cows mooing in the country!:duno
 
In my opniion it's very simple.

Was the facility being used as a race circuit before the complainants moved in?

If it was then there is no case. They choose to live beside a race track they must take personal responsibility for their decision.

This is a perfect example of how ridiculous the legal system in this country has become.

No wonder intelligent folk are bailing out by the thousand.

Unfortunately Croft has a somewhat chequered history:

  • 1949-62 intermittent car racing
  • 1963-79 car racing 20 days per year
  • 1980-94 just 10 days rallycross per year
  • 1995-97 sporadic race meetings
  • 1998-date up to 147 days track activity per year

Essentially the complainants didn't argue that they 'came to a nuisance', simply that there was a nuisance from track days. The Appeal judge agreed and granted an injunction limiting circuit activities to 40 track days a year.

The rationale for the decision is fairly specific to Croft and is premised on it being located in a rural setting.

Greg
 
croft

here we go again another motorsport in trouble,of course anybody who enjoys the sport,brings money to the local economy,has a good time then the do gooders spoil this,exactly the same as trail riding which has been outcast, all because some little shit house doesnt like the noise (ear plugs?) or move away easy solution.makes my blood boil:green gri would like to take a few do gooders for a trail ride or on the croft ring TIED UP BEHIND MY CAR OR BIKE AND DRAGGED AROUND FOR A COUPLE OF LAPS then they could complain,just my tuppence worth.
 
its a real shame,

I've had many a happy hour on the circuit:rob
 
croft

its bad news. i have done a few track days there with the rs owners club when i had my rs 500 cosworth. i wonder what would happen in monaco if someone trys to sue for noise polution over the gran prix?. It has a knock on effect if you think about scarbourgh olivers mount, castle donnington in fact all motor sports events that are held close to villages trial riding, grass tracking HAS THE WORLD GONE MAD
 
HAS THE WORLD GONE MAD

I'm a little unclear about the case TBH......but if these events were going on BEFORE these people moved into their house, then yes it's mad.

Not only that, but I can't see it standing up legally in the end- there have been several cases talked about here where for example someone moves into a house next to a 16th c church and then tries to take them to court for ringing the bells :blast

Patently ridiculous....and so it should be with this Croft case.


UNLESS......the noise is new or significantly increased, in which case, good luck to the people taking the court case :thumb2
 
its bad news. i have done a few track days there with the rs owners club when i had my rs 500 cosworth. i wonder what would happen in monaco if someone trys to sue for noise polution over the gran prix?. It has a knock on effect if you think about scarbourgh olivers mount, castle donnington in fact all motor sports events that are held close to villages trial riding, grass tracking HAS THE WORLD GONE MAD

Neither the compaint nor the injunction sought to or will have any direct effect on motor-racing at Croft. But it does limit track days and med-week testing.

Greg
 
Neither the compaint nor the injunction sought to or will have any direct effect on motor-racing at Croft. But it does limit track days and med-week testing.

Greg

Which will reduce their income and could lead to the closure of the circuit:(
 


Back
Top Bottom