JAY said:
But why better? Sure, I run my Audi diesel with fully synthetic just so I can run a couple of years without oil changes but changing the BMs oil every 6000 miles it just seems a waste of money. The engine was designed to run with normal mineral oil so what is the point?
I agree with absolutley Jay.
Paraphased below are my views on the matter (from an earlier thread):
You are perfectly right when you talk about molecular strength / stability being better with synth oils but that is not the only issue.
My experiance has been with racing and tuning Rotax lumps that run similar engine technology to Boxers, ie a lot of roller bearings and very few plain / needle bearings.
Also, like a Boxer the rev ceilings and internal tolerances are nowhere near as high as on a 4 cylinder race rep where you may need a higher shear strength etc.
Despite a number of manufacturers that use the Roatx lumps claiming that fully synth oils should be used (deals with oil companies anybody?) Rotax advocate mineral oils only.
I have seen first hand the damage a synth oil will cause to an engine like this. The oil is just too good/slippery and can allow ball races to slip rather than rotate causing premature and catastrophic engine failure.
Now I'm not saying by any stretch of the imagination that a synth oil will cause that to happen to your Boxer just that there are more issues involved than the usual 'mantra' receited re. the superiour performance of synth oils.
FWIW I intend always using a good quality mineral oil and just make sure it's reguarly changed. I see nothing to be gained by using a synth oil, not mechanically and certainly not financially.
BTW I'm well aware of what a contentious issue types of oil can be so am not trying to pick an argument, just putting forward a point of view bassed on my own personal experiance
Andres