oil help?

tailscookie

Well-known member
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
923
Reaction score
1
Location
birmingham
can i use 5w-50w fully snyth in my 2002 gs1150,i have a full can brought some time ago for my other bike? if no why?:augie
 
Don't see why not. Some people will winge about API specs but the boxer engine isn't exactly state of the art so will do fine.
 
What does the handbook say :nenau

What the handbook says is based on BMW's knowledge when it was written.

What they say now is here.

"Castrol Power 1 Racing 4T 10W-50
JASO MA-2 API SL
BMW recommendation for Boxers,
HP2 Sport and K1200LT series
"​

Greg
 
What the handbook says is based on BMW's knowledge when it was written.

What they say now is here.

"Castrol Power 1 Racing 4T 10W-50
JASO MA-2 API SL
BMW recommendation for Boxers,
HP2 Sport and K1200LT series
"​

Greg

Or are the current recommendations based on BMW being in bed with Castrol these days and under obligation to recommend products from their range?

Anyway, it looks like they recommend either 10w50 for 'ultimate performance' (there's a laugh) or 20w50 for 'trusted protection'. Either way, it would seem that 5w50 is not recommended - too 'thin' for boxers? :nenau (if nothing else, I'd guess it'll make the engine clatter like a bag of spanners).

For me with an 'x' thousand pound bike, I'd give the 5w50 to a mate with sports bike and shell out for some 20w50 (£15 aint the end of the world really)
 
"or 20w50 for 'trusted protection'":D

Well thats me onto 20:50 now. Anything for "trusted protection". I think the BMW "Lifestyle" condoms are only for the M spurt boys:D
 
Or are the current recommendations based on BMW being in bed with Castrol these days and under obligation to recommend products from their range?

Anyway, it looks like they recommend either 10w50 for 'ultimate performance' (there's a laugh) or 20w50 for 'trusted protection'. Either way, it would seem that 5w50 is not recommended - too 'thin' for boxers? :nenau (if nothing else, I'd guess it'll make the engine clatter like a bag of spanners).

For me with an 'x' thousand pound bike, I'd give the 5w50 to a mate with sports bike and shell out for some 20w50 (£15 aint the end of the world really)

5W/50 is only thin when cold. The hot viscosity (as denoted by the /50 bit) is identical to 20W/50. The fact that it is thinner when cold means it lubricates quicker from a start-up, ergo 5W/50 is better than 20W/50.
 
5W/50 is only thin when cold. The hot viscosity (as denoted by the /50 bit) is identical to 20W/50. The fact that it is thinner when cold means it lubricates quicker from a start-up, ergo 5W/50 is better than 20W/50.

'ergo' BMW don't recommend 5w50 for some reason - you'd think they would if it was 'better' :nenau

viscocity modifiers for wet clutches?...
 
'ergo' BMW don't recommend 5w50 for some reason - you'd think they would if it was 'better' :nenau

viscocity modifiers for wet clutches?...

S'funny - my manual says "5W/50 - high end fully synthetic oil for use in all temperature ranges"
 
SO WOULD YOU USE THE 5-50 FULLY SYNTH OR WHAT?:confused:

Yes, without question. A 5W/50 fully synthetic is better than a 20W/50 semi-synthetic.

Whether the bike needs the extra protection of the fully synth is a different ball-game. The only difference I could potentially see is at extreme mileages there may be less wear on stuff like cam lobes. The fact that these don't fail regularly even at high mileages suggests that the extra expense of top-end oils is probably not justified.
 


Back
Top Bottom