Panzer Patrol
Registered user
This things been bugging me, so I had to find out the story, and here it is from the BMW press release:
" A further special feature is the pressure-controlled valve integrated in the muffler which controls exhaust gas counter-pressure for an additional reduction of noise under the engine's primary running conditions at medium to low engine speeds. This keeps engine noise at a lower level, but at the same time allows the rider to hear that famous flat-twin rumble that everyone appreciates so much."
I dont know what they are on about when they say "keeps the engine noise at a lower level" What I do know is, on my 1150 the diameter of the pipes in a Y piece has a noticable effect on the engines torque. If they are too large in diameter, the motor will rev more freely but it loses a some of its bottom end grunt. Smaller diameter pipes retain the engines torque, maybe even increases it a bit, but it doesnt seem to want rev as freely. It might be wishfull thinking on my part, but using a valve in the silencer to maintain back-pressure for bottom end, but also allowing more flow at high rpm, would seem like a good idea.... just a thought
" A further special feature is the pressure-controlled valve integrated in the muffler which controls exhaust gas counter-pressure for an additional reduction of noise under the engine's primary running conditions at medium to low engine speeds. This keeps engine noise at a lower level, but at the same time allows the rider to hear that famous flat-twin rumble that everyone appreciates so much."
I dont know what they are on about when they say "keeps the engine noise at a lower level" What I do know is, on my 1150 the diameter of the pipes in a Y piece has a noticable effect on the engines torque. If they are too large in diameter, the motor will rev more freely but it loses a some of its bottom end grunt. Smaller diameter pipes retain the engines torque, maybe even increases it a bit, but it doesnt seem to want rev as freely. It might be wishfull thinking on my part, but using a valve in the silencer to maintain back-pressure for bottom end, but also allowing more flow at high rpm, would seem like a good idea.... just a thought
