I will give you the £2450 for it and promise not to hipsterize it !Here’s one I had in earlier ..
View attachment 395404View attachment 395405
And my later R100GS with 5k miles which I still have tucked away in the garage, it’s an old picture but may have been the last time I used it before putting it into storage
I put it up for sale a few years ago on the forum for £2450.. had someone come along, said he’d buy it, and then proceeded to tell me how he was going to build a hipster special out of it.
I refused to sell it to him and decided to keep it
View attachment 395406
You wearing those shoes for a bet?

I think that’s a given. JJHI’m sure I still have them somewhere![]()
Not so sure. Looks are the best but so much lacking, a bit like a C15/Starfire scrambler! The ST was/is a much better road bike and not only this but can be changed to a G/S, nobody changes a G/S to an ST do they? This is mostly nostalgia, romance if you like, there's nowt wrong with that, a bit like when mountain bikes became the thing and everyone with a road bike that had done the trails thought they needed one just to be cool. Mostly dreams and bollocks, imo.Maybe,possibly.
I guess it depends on an individual’s opinion.
At the time of its release,it was a “ monster trail bike” and a Dakar inspired bike.
Its evolution into the paralever saw it get a bit bigger,more complex.
After that,hmm the 1100, a lot more bulk,huge weight gain.
The 1150 ,more evolution,I think riders saw them as good touring bikes whilst,if you had ability,still very capable off road.
The mk 1 1200 seemed to be a very positive step ,less weight,more power,an amazing touring bike with true off road prowess.
1200 LC,no comment.
Back to the R 80g/s
In today’s mind set,it’s tiny,it’s light,it’s nimble.
On the road,it’s as quick as you need.
Ok so the suspension is basic,the brakes,,,,,adequate.
For a bike that’s getting on for 45 years old,I’d take one over any new bike![]()
Wow, is that an STCan’t beat a bit of nostalgiaView attachment 395477

Wow, is that an ST![]()
Yes, agreed! I've owned my old bus since 1983 simply because I've never seen another bike to do 'everything' as well as the g/s does. 40 years out of date and still lighter than most modern adventure bikes!Maybe,possibly.
I guess it depends on an individual’s opinion.
At the time of its release,it was a “ monster trail bike” and a Dakar inspired bike.
Its evolution into the paralever saw it get a bit bigger,more complex.
After that,hmm the 1100, a lot more bulk,huge weight gain.
The 1150 ,more evolution,I think riders saw them as good touring bikes whilst,if you had ability,still very capable off road.
The mk 1 1200 seemed to be a very positive step ,less weight,more power,an amazing touring bike with true off road prowess.
1200 LC,no comment.
Back to the R 80g/s
In today’s mind set,it’s tiny,it’s light,it’s nimble.
On the road,it’s as quick as you need.
Ok so the suspension is basic,the brakes,,,,,adequate.
For a bike that’s getting on for 45 years old,I’d take one over any new bike![]()
ah .. yes .. been there .. ended up buying a big spool of seizing wire
.
1200 LC,no comment.
Very few of us here will be around to find outAll fair comment.
But we will see how many LC bikes are still on the road in 45 years![]()
