Servo Failures: DRIVERS' PERCEPTION OF SECONDARY BRAKING SYSTEMS

Engineer said:
Thanks Dave that is helpful - my feeling is that extra braking force is not required on a motorcyle as modern motorcycle disc brakes can lock the wheels easily anyway, so I don't believe that we need a system that creates an even greater braking force.
Will

I tend to agree with you here, which is why my belief is that it's more likely to be a regulation issue than design for design's sake.
 
bigkuri said:
All these world-wide dicussions on servo's - why cannot unhappy owners simply buy some new brakes lines and bypass the whole lot? I know that this would also get rid of ABS, but if some are so concerned about it, then why not?

I'm very happy with my servo brakes, thank you very much. Stopping a fully laden 270kg (unladen) bike when pulling off autobahn slip roads from speeds that would get you jailed in the UK has never been so easy.

Having got used to them (and especially after the last brake fluid change), I think there's plenty of feel.



bigkuri said:
As far as I can tell all the master cylinder pistons are the same, likewise the other "manual" braking components.

The result should be pure simply manual brakes? :confused:

My guess is that the master cylinder must be different. If it had the same operation and power as the non-servo version, the ABS would come-in as soon as you breathed near the lever. I guess if you bypassed the servo, you'd have little more than the "residual" braking force left. Those people with servo brakes will know what that is like (with the ignition switched off). For non-servo brake owners - try stopping the car without the engine running for a demo, but please don't try this on a public road or anywhere you might actually have to stop.....
 
Dave Barrett said:
I'm very happy with my servo brakes, thank you very much. Stopping a fully laden 270kg (unladen) bike when pulling off autobahn slip roads from speeds that would get you jailed in the UK has never been so easy.


My point, Dave, is that I can say exactly the same for my non-servo brakes - where's the gain?

Mike:confused:
 
Mike, I've owned both versions of the 1150GS - with and without servo ABS. I can honestly say that the braking performance, especially from high speed, is far superior on the servo version - no question about that.

Having said that, I also agree with you that I never questioned the performance of the pre-servo version, which was still damned good.

I don't now how old you are Mike, but did you ever drive any old cars without servo brakes? At the time, no-one questioned brake performance or brake effort.

To sum up: I think it's called progress or something...
 
Dave Barrett said:
My guess is that the master cylinder must be different. If it had the same operation and power as the non-servo version, the ABS would come-in as soon as you breathed near the lever. I guess if you bypassed the servo, you'd have little more than the "residual" braking force left. Those people with servo brakes will know what that is like (with the ignition switched off). For non-servo brake owners - try stopping the car without the engine running for a demo, but please don't try this on a public road or anywhere you might actually have to stop..... [/B]

Don't think so? Residual braking is only the way it is as you are manually pumping through the "redundant" servo and abs unit. What I'm meaning is bypassing the servo which mean a direct link from handgrip to brake - no in-betweens. The servo and abs would not be a factor.
 
Progress...

Progress is, when BMW will invent brakes without servos.

We know from the Article in DIE WELT (12/18/04) they do.

This is called progress! The other is called BMW BS!

OH
 
Re: Horrific new failure reported?

John Armstrong said:
I was horrified to read this on Advrider:

http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65182

BMW just don't care! (oops I'll have set him off again):D

Could this be why I saw an Adv with spotlights from the old Wembley stadium on his bike in Aylesbury on Sunday? God knows what they were doing to the fuel economy of his bike. They must have been at least 10" in diameter!
 
Just as an aside, a friend of mine had a headlamp problem on his Honda many years ago - something shorted out and the lamp went out, resulting in him crashing into a car (it was night).

Honda paid him a few grand compensation for that. For years he had the remains of the frame mounted on a trophy plaque on his living room wall :)
 
Re: Re: Horrific new failure reported?

The headlamp on my Ducati has never failed - so perhaps BMW should fit Ducati headlamps instead of the unreliable ones they are currently using ;-)
 
significant engineering developments

DRIVERS' PERCEPTION OF SECONDARY BRAKING SYSTEMS

http://www.mira.co.uk/site/ResearchReports/0235036-01_Main.pdf

...

• All drivers could stop from 64 kph within the 58m distance to the traffic lights with fully working brakes
• 31 out of 48 could not stop with a circuit failure
• 34 out of 48 could not stop with a servo failure
• Average speed on crossing the stop line was 20kph with circuit failure, 24kph with servo failure

... most were unable to use the secondary braking system to full advantage.


I do have a question about the long term recommendations of the MIRA Report, requiring significant engineering developments.

"Technologies such as electro-hydraulic braking will become available on more vehicles although it may be many years before their widespread adoption."

What the hell does that mean? Do they suggest to use electro-hydraulic brakes?

OH
 
Re: significant engineering developments

[email][email protected][/email] said:
I do have a question about the long term recommendations of the MIRA Report, requiring significant engineering developments.

"Technologies such as electro-hydraulic braking will become available on more vehicles although it may be many years before their widespread adoption."

What the hell does that mean? Do they suggest to use electro-hydraulic brakes?

OH

I do not think that they mean anything - it is just an observation.
As a professional Engineer their findings do not surprise me.
 
Look guys, this is not conjecture. MY GS1150 INTEGRAL ABS has had two servos replaced. The first one would run when the front brakes were applied gently then released.and not go off. But although the servo was running brakes were not being applied.
5 weeks later the servo failed just after leaving my house, braking power greatly diminshed. Just to rub salt into the wound, the ABS lights came on after I had stopped.
Both were done under warrantee,FORTUNATELY.
 
Would a GS with the servo disabled pass an MOT?
 
I think so, if the tester knew to pull the lever hard enough. Two people on this board have independently confirmed that servo failure doesn't affect braking distance.
 
deceleration is different

sorry - this is really not possible.

The maximum deceleration of the servo-brake ist different of the maximum deceleraton of the brake when the servos are switched off.

Because of the different maximum deceleration the servo failure indeed does affect braking distance!

Tests under realistic condition with both maximum deceleration of (1) servos and (2) no servos withe the integral brake showed the extension of braking distances.

But this is not the problem, and this is legal at all! The problem is, that in case of the failure you are surprised and may think that you might have no brakes at all.

And – of course you suddenly have no ABS, but you were used to ABS. Keep that in mind.

Sorry, but the statement "servo failure doesn't affect braking distance" is wrong! If - theoretically - this were true, what the are servos about?

OH
 
Mouse said:
I think so, if the tester knew to pull the lever hard enough. Two people on this board have independently confirmed that servo failure doesn't affect braking distance.


DOH!
If the servo failure does not affect braking distance then why bother fitting one? 'Normal' good quality non-servo brakes can stop a bike very effectively with only moderate pressure on the lever.
 
Re: deceleration is different

[email][email protected][/email] said:
sorry - this is really not possible.

The maximum deceleration of the servo-brake ist different of the maximum deceleraton of the brake when the servos are switched off.

Because of the different maximum deceleration the servo failure indeed does affect braking distance!

Tests under realistic condition with both maximum deceleration of (1) servos and (2) no servos withe the integral brake showed the extension of braking distances.

But this is not the problem, and this is legal at all! The problem is, that in case of the failure you are surprised and may think that you might have no brakes at all.

And – of course you suddenly have no ABS, but you were used to ABS. Keep that in mind.

Sorry, but the statement "servo failure doesn't affect braking distance" is wrong! If - theoretically - this were true, what the are servos about?

OH

Have to agree with oprah on this one - it is the sudden, unexpected change in braking performance that is potentially dangerous.

It is essential to have complete confidence in the brakes on a motorcyle - the rider should not have to be 'worrying' if the brakes are going to work as expected when they are required - particularly in an emgergency.

I have no idea if there is a real problem or not with BMW Servo/ABS brakes. I have only read the comments in these forums - I have no hard evidence whatsoever; but if there is the slightest doubt then BMW MUST investigate as a matter of urgency and be totally open with the results. Have they done this?
 


Back
Top Bottom