Lc or not LC? Now that is the question.
It is interesting. I've had a good few gsa's and 1 gs, the Rallye, which I've just come back from a trip to Prague in all THAT rain. I can honestly say that the GSA gives loads, and I mean loads more wind/rain protection. I thought I'd go for the lighter GS, and the GSA is a heavy brute full of gas, but I really missed the 400 mile tank range and the extra wind and rain protection. So off I went, thinking of a LC...it was good, but rattly and full of lots of plastic. Better than a gs or gsa? Well, not really, just different, and not for me. If I want more speed, the K1300s comes out...though not very often these days. I just want a comfy, reliable, tried and tested bike that'll do the job. So, a 90yr anniversary GSA got the vote- and with 2K worth of freebies, and the dealer giving me £11500 p/x for my rallye against a fully loaded 90yr GSA, with free metal panniers, satnav, pannier bags, tinted screen, tank bag- and just 3K to change, it was a total no-brainer. I'll watch as the LC's go through all the teething issues, and may fall for its charms, but I'm not convinced as yet.