So, OK, who's up for this?
Get Arsey and some of his mates to do say, 50,000 miles in three years on some of these Chinese bikes and that'll be evidence of how good they are.
I say this because during the 70s and 80s I'd usually average around 30,000 miles per annum, business and pleasure. Tried Jap bikes of the time and let's say that these were the main reason why I switched to BMW. Throw away the rose-coloured spectacles and remember what Japanese bikes were really like. Metal which resembled putty, chrome brake discs (!!) on Hondas and chrome which fell off wheels and mudguards within around 6 months. Drop the bike and the engine cases would crack or worse. Been there, done that. Mechanically, not bad but snapped engine studs and rounded-off screws etc made them very challenging to fix. Then someone said try a new VFR 750, they're amazing. Well it was until the engine ate its own cams after around 6 months. Guy I work with part time said how reliable his (fairly modern) Honda 500 is. Turns out he'd ridden 440 miles between the last two MOTs!
So anyway, I went over to BMWs. I still have four, plus several other bikes. Sold a R100RT a few years back with 204,000 miles on the clock. Sam Manicom's R80's probably done double that. Mechanically, the RT was still good but after a dozen or so winters, the frame was suffering from salt-related corrosion.
None of the Japanese bikes got even close.
So, stop being blinded with all the fancy gimmicks (new BMWs are no different) and come back with tales of how the bikes really perform over many miles on real roads. Maybe if you do 440 miles a year then Chinese bikes will be fine. When I was doing big miles, the Jap showrooms were full of s/h bikes which had done less than 5,000 miles and they too had probably been fine. But let's see what this Chinese stuff will do over some real miles over a few years.
So, OK, who's up for this?