Touratech lower engine bars

TaffyScouser

Well-known member
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
Jan 3, 2002
Messages
888
Reaction score
28
Location
W Wales
Installation Manuals for latest Touratech bars from Nippys don’t seem to want to download! Part number now Starts with an 05 not an 01 so no joy getting instructions with new bars from Nippys.
Anyone got a download? Need torque settings.
 
Last edited:
Installation Manuals for latest Touratech bars from Nippys don’t seem to want to download! Part number now Starts with an 05 not an 01 so no joy getting instructions with new bars from Nippys.
Anyone got a download? Need torque settings.
My bad- was searching for number on fixing kit. 😱😂
 
these "better 4 prong bars" might be great, or might do what many crash bungs do - many aftermarket crash bungs write off bikes in minor crashes - tearing the frame at the mounting point

the frame on a GS1300 is a cast thing (of not very high quality material) with a wall thickness I would hope was all calculated by experts in CAD - thus BMW should have a thickness on the frame rail / wall that gives just the frame rigidity required for their nimble handling and nicely supports the engine power with very little wriggle room - otherwise they would be wasting money on each bike and adding weight they didn't want...

so the frame rail where touratech land the forth prong was never in BMW land ever expected to take a side loading in any form - the very fact BMW do three prong engine bars and do not have a forth waiting to punch a hole in the frame - might be an oversight - or might be very intentional - indeed there are multiple you-tuber video's where hoddies are throwing bog standard BMW enduro spec bikes on the floor deliberately - and I never saw one say the bars bent or were useless (noting, of course we can have different levels of arguing with physics)

now touratech might have done vast research and landed on a spot of great strength and spread the load very carefully - landing a much better solution - but I think more likely, they are big headed, over priced jokers, who never thought about the consequences
 
Last edited:
snip

the frame on a GS1300 is a cast thing (of not very high quality material) with a wall thickness I would hope was all calculated by experts in CAD - thus BMW should have a thickness on the frame rail / wall that gives just the frame rigidity required for their nimble handling and nicely supports the engine power with very little wriggle room - otherwise they would be wasting money on each bike and adding weight they didn't want...

snip
Lolz what tf are you talking about? The GS frame is not a "cast thing" and lower engine bars (from most all companys) mount to the engine. Your information is completely incorrect
 
these "better 4 prong bars" might be great, or might do what many crash bungs do - many aftermarket crash bungs write off bikes in minor crashes - tearing the frame at the mounting point

the frame on a GS1300 is a cast thing (of not very high quality material) with a wall thickness I would hope was all calculated by experts in CAD - thus BMW should have a thickness on the frame rail / wall that gives just the frame rigidity required for their nimble handling and nicely supports the engine power with very little wriggle room - otherwise they would be wasting money on each bike and adding weight they didn't want...

so the frame rail where touratech land the forth prong was never in BMW land ever expected to take a side loading in any form - the very fact BMW do three prong engine bars and do not have a forth waiting to punch a hole in the frame - might be an oversight - or might be very intentional - indeed there are multiple you-tuber video's where hoddies are throwing bog standard BMW enduro spec bikes on the floor deliberately - and I never saw one say the bars bent or were useless (noting, of course we can have different levels of arguing with physics)

now touratech might have done vast research and landed on a spot of great strength and spread the load very carefully - landing a much better solution - but I think more likely, they are big headed, over priced jokers, who never thought about the consequences
Why do you keep doing this? You pop up on random threads, plant a bunch of disinformation and off you go.

When your information is challenged you do not even attempt to defend it. Classic troll, I guess.
 
these "better 4 prong bars" might be great, or might do what many crash bungs do - many aftermarket crash bungs write off bikes in minor crashes - tearing the frame at the mounting point

the frame on a GS1300 is a cast thing (of not very high quality material) with a wall thickness I would hope was all calculated by experts in CAD - thus BMW should have a thickness on the frame rail / wall that gives just the frame rigidity required for their nimble handling and nicely supports the engine power with very little wriggle room - otherwise they would be wasting money on each bike and adding weight they didn't want...

so the frame rail where touratech land the forth prong was never in BMW land ever expected to take a side loading in any form - the very fact BMW do three prong engine bars and do not have a forth waiting to punch a hole in the frame - might be an oversight - or might be very intentional - indeed there are multiple you-tuber video's where hoddies are throwing bog standard BMW enduro spec bikes on the floor deliberately - and I never saw one say the bars bent or were useless (noting, of course we can have different levels of arguing with physics)

now touratech might have done vast research and landed on a spot of great strength and spread the load very carefully - landing a much better solution - but I think more likely, they are big headed, over priced jokers, who never thought about the consequences
Everyone uses the same three threaded points and TT just butts up against one of the strongest areas on frame. You must have a big axe to grind with someone.
 
Botus trolling again….
His “ place /location “ says it all…. “Berk”
 


Back
Top Bottom