Tyre Mileage on 1200GSA

GS Bloke

Registered user
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
742
Reaction score
0
Location
Bedfordshire Village, England
Hi
I have just worn out my rear Metzler Tourance after 4000 miles, does this sound right as I think it is a bit low?
I tend to stay off the m/ways and don't accelerate hard (not often anyway!).

Any thoughts?
 
Rob, if it`s one of the newer Tourances, that mileage would seem about right as they aren`t as hard wearing as the older model.

I use Continental Trail Attacks and get about 5500 on the rear with all types of riding. I`m happy with that mileage:thumb
 
Yup, seems right, i am getting about the same, was getting 7000 plus on my 1150gsa but the 12 seems to be that bit harder on them
 
I get 6000-8000 on whatever tyre I use (and I'm not easy on them) which I put down to anti puncture goo. The makers claim 20%-40% longer tyre life as well as fewer flats.

I've used Ultraseal (now known as Puncturesafe) for years and years and am so impressed I became a local distributor (not a blatant plug but .......)
 
Thanks for that - very interesting.
The spec for the tyres from BMW is R rated, I am guessing this is the speed rating - can I use a V or another rating?
 
The spec for the tyres from BMW is R rated, I am guessing this is the speed rating - can I use a V or another rating?

Are you sure that's not R for Radial? Though R is a speed rating:
http://www.conti-tyres.co.uk/contibike/tyreinfo.php

You can use any speed rating thats higher than the one they recommend. Though this is the edge of my understanding, so I normally go for the ones recommended by the manufacturer.

TobyS
 
i thought bmw specced H for the 11**s and V for the 12s. might be wrong, i've not checked. Tourance is only available in V now anyway.

i get more than 6K out of an old school tourance rear, and a bit more from the front.
 
i thought bmw specced H for the 11**s and V for the 12s. might be wrong, i've not checked. Tourance is only available in V now anyway.

.

That's my understanding too :thumb2

With regard to speed ratings you are best off not running one higher than that reccomended for your bike as one aspect of speed rating is the tyres running temperature. Therefore there is the potential for a tyre with too high a rating never getting up to it's correct operating temp.

A good example is that the reverse is often used with supermotos where you want ultimate grip and hang the tyre life, H rated tyres are more popular than V rated - even though super sticky sports tyres are all V rated and the H rated ones are all old school in comparison.

Andres
 
Well looking on the BMW website they give the sizes with a R rating.
Taken from motorad site for 1200GSA:

Tyres, front 110/80 R 19
Tyres, rear 150/70 R 17
 
Well looking on the BMW website they give the sizes with a R rating.
Taken from motorad site for 1200GSA:

Tyres, front 110/80 R 19
Tyres, rear 150/70 R 17

means "Radial" in that position.

link
 
Doing my head in ........lol

Hi all,

This tyre thing is doing my head in! :spitfire new tyres due in the next 2 weeks (trip to Spain Sept etc) I have/ride a 1200 Adv.

Rode on the old Tourance’s for the past 7 years, (various GS’s )so many threads, so many opinions but really tempted by the Continental road attacks despite what “Bike Mag” say this month. :nenau

TD
 
There`s a lot to be said about going with what you know.

Of the three different tyres I`ve had on my 12, D607`s, Pilot Roads & Distanzias I`ve had between 5-6.5 k miles from them
 
Jez I'm a wuss - I do ~12k a year commuting every day on the M25/M4 and weekend trips. That sees me get ~10000 out of a rear and 18-20000 out of a front. Standard Tourances. - currently up to 15k and still on the original front. The rear got a puncture at 8k and the new one's ~half worn.

4k on a rear??? That's bike must see more doughnuts than Homer Simpson...
 
Jez I'm a wuss - I do ~12k a year commuting every day on the M25/M4 and weekend trips. That sees me get ~10000 out of a rear and 18-20000 out of a front. Standard Tourances. - currently up to 15k and still on the original front. The rear got a puncture at 8k and the new one's ~half worn.

4k on a rear??? That's bike must see more doughnuts than Homer Simpson...

ASC stops any doughnuts, 10K - are you sure......:eek:
 
Chatting to a fellow GSer at the weekend and he is still going strong at 11K on his tourances.
I reckoned he still had another 1-2K to go. :thumb

My rear tourance is half worn at 5K.:thumb2

Both of us don't really hang about and our mileage is mainly on country roads.

So to answer you Q, 4K is pish poor:eek:
 
got 11,500miles+ on my last rear tourance (1150gs):nenau

Chatting to a fellow GSer at the weekend and he is still going strong at 11K on his tourances.
I reckoned he still had another 1-2K to go. :thumb

My rear tourance is half worn at 5K.:thumb2

Both of us don't really hang about and our mileage is mainly on country roads.

So to answer you Q, 4K is pish poor:eek:

Jez I'm a wuss - I do ~12k a year commuting every day on the M25/M4 and weekend trips. That sees me get ~10000 out of a rear and 18-20000 out of a front. Standard Tourances. - currently up to 15k and still on the original front. The rear got a puncture at 8k and the new one's ~half worn.

4k on a rear??? That's bike must see more doughnuts than Homer Simpson...


I'm glad to see I'm not alone. I too get better than average mileage, the last set gave me 11'000 from the rear and 14'000 from the front.

There is one exception though. I use TKC80s. I'm not a speed deamon these days but I'll usually cruise at around 75-80. However most of my mileage is done following trainees around town.

It's not the type of road you travel on that does for your tyres, but the way you use them. Acceleration is the big killer of tyres, all those short swift getaways at the lights and quick overtakes will cost you as much as 50% of your possible mileage.

Planning your progress 'junctions, overtakes, pulling away from the side of the road or the driveway' will give you loads of extra miles. You'll find it's not only your tyres that benefit too. Your fuel cost will go down as your MPG goes up. Your bike will suffer less ware and tare and you yourself will be less fatigued at journeys end.
You may even find that your journey takes five minutes less too.

There is a train of thought within the various training bodies that implies:
A rider who consistently gets poor mileage from fuel and tyres, is himself a poor rider.
Either that or he's a mad fekker :D
Though you'll find that actually even the mad fekker gets surprisingly good averages (and if he doesn't, he don't live long).

Going back to what rdover was saying about 'Puncture safe' It is also proven that having a mobile material inside the tyre will create a much better overall balancing affect on the tyre as it wears down. Fixed weights are only accurate at the time of balancing. As a tyre starts to ware this point of balance becomes less effective. But having something in the tyre like slime, puncture safe or balancing beads can 'as rdover mentions' increase the life of the tyre by as much as 40%.

Why not try some of these things. You never know you could be saving your self quite a few quid each year.


Val.

Oh I forgot to mention;
Hard acceleration is much more fun when done in the bends ;) Why do you think they put the tread that far round the sides :clap :D
 
Lets face it - a GS1200 is not a fast accelerating bike.
I do break hard, had the ABS kick in a few times on the rear - so maybe thats it.
I don't tear about, but I also like to get a move on. Cruise about 80/85.
I was down in Devon last weekend and did notice on the rough back roads that each small imperfection in the road surface came right up through the bike, thought I had a flat it was so rough, so gonna try some Conti Trial attacks as they look nice :o
 
Lets face it - a GS1200 is not a fast accelerating bike.

Err - Yes it is. It's ~400bhp/tonne! How fast is 'fast' ???


And if you're feeling every bump I'd have a look at your suspension settings before makeing tyre choices...
 


Back
Top Bottom