I've covered a 100 miles or so on my Roadtec 01's now, and whilst I haven't pushed them yet there are several observations in comparison to the previous Anakees.
First of all, more comfortable.
Second less noise, to the extent that I'm hearing some nice whirring noises from the boxer that I hadn't noticed before.
Three, the biggie, the 01s keep the line in corners far better than the Anakees. Even when new, it seemed as if the Anakees front tyre wanted to 'toe-in' to the corner, if that makes sense.
I know there's all manner of tyre voodoo that makes one better than another, for certain situations. But the difference between the Roadtec's and the Anakees is so marked, I just wondered: what's the principal difference between tyres that means that one holds a line round a corner than another? I'm not necessarily talking about lean angle here, simply holding a line. Or did I simply have a bad front tyre?
First of all, more comfortable.
Second less noise, to the extent that I'm hearing some nice whirring noises from the boxer that I hadn't noticed before.
Three, the biggie, the 01s keep the line in corners far better than the Anakees. Even when new, it seemed as if the Anakees front tyre wanted to 'toe-in' to the corner, if that makes sense.
I know there's all manner of tyre voodoo that makes one better than another, for certain situations. But the difference between the Roadtec's and the Anakees is so marked, I just wondered: what's the principal difference between tyres that means that one holds a line round a corner than another? I'm not necessarily talking about lean angle here, simply holding a line. Or did I simply have a bad front tyre?