Test rode a Stelvio NTX last summer.
Expected lots of pleasant surprises, but although quite fast/lungey on the throttle, it was vibey, ergonomics were weird, everything rattled and the finish looked cheap (poor quality plastic, nothing quite fitted, even the screws looked cheap).
Worst of all are the MG dealers I've met.... look slightly shady (even when you can find one) and curse the factory for its unreliable response to spare shortages at the same time as trying to convince you to buy one. Moto Guzzi do have some good dealerships but they need to develop better relationships with them (in my view) and avoid the dodgy ones.
I had MGs through the 1970s and 1980s and I am sure they were better bikes then. Call me a Luddite, but the new MGs look great but require real dedication as an owner. And don't rely on the dealers to stay dealers for too long.
Frankly, a lot of the road tests by the journalist types are really a load of tosh. One well known journalist's write up on the MG NTX was probably influenced by all the fine wine they'd filled him up with the previous evening. They write what suits them, not you.
Even in Italy, buying a MG is a play of the cards (or so I'm told). And whoever designed the MG Stelvio front end needs shooting, to be frank.
i'm ok with the stelvio front end. TBH it's all the crappy meccano on the back end that bothers me. otherwise, a spot on summary of Moto Guzzi these days.
i recommend a new beemer, and a 70's guzzi (or 2 maybe ).
Pot / Kettle 
