Does anyone have a complete explanation of how this system actually works?
I do, its MAGIC. that's all you need to know. Ride the bike, enjoy,
I do, its MAGIC. that's all you need to know. Ride the bike, enjoy,



I'm no Techno wizard and usually stay well clear of anything I don't understand.
However,after having ESA on my TC and likeing it I opted to go for the "Dynamic ESA" on my WC.
There is a particular road that I ride regularly, it's a single track and at times very undulateing lots of gnarley bits etc
Honestly the way the WC covers this road compared to my TC is a revelation.
Sorry I can't explain it technically but I do know what the seat of my pants tells me.
It's brilliant.
Steve
) and was saying that he just couldn't get on the gas on some corners because the tyres were still skipping and chattering. And that's the sort of difference that good suspension will make, the GS seems to float over that gnarly stuff and allow you to get on the drive where others are waiting for it all to settle down before they can pick the gas up.I too know bugger all about fancy electronics, but I think I have a pretty good feel for how a bike is riding.
Whatever they've done on the LC, it's bloody good. I had a play with a work mate the other day on a selection of country lanes. He was on his VFR1200. Ok, so the bikes are pretty different, the GS is famed for its lovely front end flickability and the VFR is a big fast smooth A road muncher, but even so - my work colleague is a bloody good rider and afterwards he was pretty amazed at just how well the GS was coping with the bumpy roads and how in particular, it was able to put down it's power and still drive. He was really struggling to hold on to the GS's coat tails (well ... he wasn't ...) and was saying that he just couldn't get on the gas on some corners because the tyres were still skipping and chattering. And that's the sort of difference that good suspension will make, the GS seems to float over that gnarly stuff and allow you to get on the drive where others are waiting for it all to settle down before they can pick the gas up.
I think it's very very good ....![]()
ESA has been out for a number of years now, but this dynamic incarnation seems to have sneaked in with little announcement and little technical detail. If it's the same as fitted to the HP4 and I believe that it is the same Sachs system , then it is very clever indeed.
Did the WC launch with dynamic ESA ? Does it have lean angle input like the HP4 ? Why are both systems given different names ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Appreciate this May be a silly question, how do you know if the ESA is dynamic? Are they all dynamic if ESA is fitted?