Uinneag
Guest
They make some nice muddy tracks for GS's mind


Onshore towers are a waste of time - what difference does a dozen towers make, or even fifty.....nothing. Especially as the onshore towers are babies compared to the big boys offshore. .

Once again............... "Caithness is self-sufficient in electrical power, all derived from wind turbines"
Al![]()
Oh, and wind turbines kill bats, it's the fall in air pressure near the blades makes their little lungs explode, was on the BBC and everything!
Population of Caithness is about 25,000 which is about half of one percent of the population of Scotland and in an area with one of the lowest population densities in Europe and with one of the highest average wind speeds in Europe.
On the greater scheme of things, we can't all follow your example, i'm afraid.
Very true, but your statement about onshore wind turbines as being a waste of time - begged clarification/correction.
I would estimate that all areas north of Inverness could become self-sufficient in electrical power - which reduces the transmission losses associated with receiving power from Peterhead, Cockenzie, Hunterston etc.
Scotland is ideally placed to harness a vast amount of tidal/wave, wind and hydro power - the only limiting factor is.............
The government insists on "licensing" so that if any money is to be made from it - it goes to them
Al![]()
Would really apprciate a link to the actual article. I've been involved with wind turbines for a while and these are all myths, i'm afraid, put about by objectors that have run out of actual scientific arguements.
See earlier post about eagles. Bats catch flies by Sonar. If they can't see a wind turbine blade then they aint much good as bats.
Several big studies have been carried out looking for dead birds around wind turbines - they just aint there. Think we would have spotted all the exploded bats.
Here y'go :
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7581990.stm
What the OP needs is to find some Great Crested Newts on the site - we've got loads here, protected species, they've fecked our bypass, but might save us from the freight depot...
I'll post you one if you like...
Towers are steel and the blades are fibre glass or similar composite.
Payback for energy consumed during manufacture is a couple of years.
Pretty green compared to the alternatives.
You may have missed my point, I did put another post on what I was getting at on page 3, I think it was.
Theoretically, it could be argued that a wind farm destroys 2 landscapes - the one it is put up in the one where the mine that they got the iron ore from.
You mention composite materials - some of the chemicals and resins that are used during their manufacture can be pretty harmful if not handled correctly.
EVERYTHING we do has a negative effect on something, depending on how you look at it. (for example, going out for a run on the bike uses petrol and puts more wear and tear on it, and bring it closer to a service, which all costs money...but the enjoyment of being out on the bike outweighs the cost, thats why we do it right?)
Do the bad points out weigh the good? Thats up to the local govenment, planning officers and the local community to thrash out.
Personally, I like wind turbines, and have been facinated with them since I saw my first one at Berrydale when we lived in Caithness.
The ironic thing is most of the wind turbines would have been shutdown today as it is too windy for them.
Not really got a grip of what I'm saying have you![]()
Windfarms on my doorstep
by Connie Francis