Yes or no. Scottish residents only please

yes, no or undecided


  • Total voters
    133
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nothing fucked up as far as I'm concerned Den.

However.....the demographics of Scotland being what they are, are you seriously telling me that there can ever be anything but left wing governance in Scotland? Ever? Be it labour or SNP? I just don't believe you. Because the tories got voted for in the 1930's can't mean anything in the future. By the time the electorate realize their error it'll be too late.

The whole country was stupid enough to vote for the left wing in the Blair/Brown/Balls years, and look where that left us. My post, which Den refers to as a generalization, is no such thing. It is a response to a specific motive averred to by Toddy, who appears to be the main spokesman for the indies, and clearly is in it for one thing...socialism. It is a warning to those undecided voters that a 'by product' of independence will be a return to left wing politics on a grand scale. 'Free' this, 'free' that are the promises from eck. This guarantee of a socialist regime is why Tommy Sheridan for example is so keen on it.

Certainly I am, I suppose, right wing generally. Can't help that. I suppose mostly because I can see how socialism fails everybody everywhere. I also fear very much for rural Scotland in independence, because the agenda will be driven by a body who have no idea how the country bits work. They are anti estate, anti shooting, anti private land ownership, anti deer(because they are seen as an icon of estate sporting shooting)(Rob Gibson SNP convenor of Rural Affairs Committee recently tried to get all Scottish Deer Management under Scottish Government Control). They have often tried to get the right to buy legislation regardless of the owners wishes pushed through.

Quite who they think is going to plough the millions of pounds into the rural economy to replace this enormous flow of cash from estate owners is not clear. The tenant on a large chunk of Invercauld Estate has recently increased his game-keeping staff from 3 to 8. That potentially is 8 households and families living and working in the countryside. The same man has spent 2 million quid on doing up the house. He is spending millions more on the estate infrastructure. Will the Scottish Government spend anything like that? Will they fuck! Yet they feel able to gleefully reject this sort of investment The Scottish Government is destroying native migratory fish ....salmon and seatrout....for the benefit of the fish farming industry....most of which is owned by foreign companies, Norwegians, who are not allowed to do in their own country what they do here because of the damage they do to their environment in Norway. The Faeroese and Greenland fisherman have a voluntary agreement not to net salmon at sea...most of the Scottish and Irish salmon overwinter in their waters. However because the Scottish Government have now allowed coastal netting to resume, despite all the best scientific advice, these foreign fishermen are about to tear up their agreement, probably sounding the final death knell for the scottish salmon.

So maybe I'm selfish. I said I was earlier in one or the other of these threads. But it is vital that people realize that our leaders are not fit to govern; they are already doing significant harm to Scotland; independence will allow them to really fuck the place up. So maybe you are right; I am implying they are too stupid to govern the country; they prove it to us at virtually every opportunity. They are unable even to tell me how my pension will be paid?? 4 months before I'm supposed to decide whether they know what they are doing?? Crazy!!

Now I realize that most of what I have been banging on about is of absolutely no interest or import to a 17 year old from Alloa, or Kilsyth, or most on here who will shrug their shoulders and say 'oh well its only for the toffs'. But it isn't. And once everyone else realises, it'll be too late, and thats why I keep banging my drum, trying to show people what a mistake they might make, and why. I suppose I could just shut up and see, but I love this country too much for it to be taken into a backwater by a bunch of useless chancers,and should stay an integral and valuable part of the sixth largest economy of the world, rather than sleepwalking into......small, independent, self governed...... insignificance.

I'm waiting for a note from your mother to explain your absence from the last Blackloonies??
 
The Scottish Government is destroying native migratory fish ....salmon and seatrout....for the benefit of the fish farming industry.., Norwegians, who are not allowed to do in their own country what they do here because of the damage they do to their environment in Norway.

Norway has a very healthy fish farming industry Gerry. . So do we.

Edit: Sorry Gerry, misread your statement. Thought you said Norway didnt have any fish farms. I could have deleted my reply, but thought I'd keep it all fair.
 
This thread is a classic :-)

I really don't know which way I will vote (I believe I still get one if I want up to 12 months out of country). Half of me says no as I would like to see Scotland stay in the UK and half says Yes as I can understand why the Scottish people want independence. What I have seen though is that (imho) nearly all of the people who want to vote Yes will do so for the wrong reason and it is just a slanging match of nonsense statements regarding why Scotland will be better off or why it wont be. I think it will work either way but just how well it work is the main question. If it does get independence it will be good that people don't vote SNP because it has the word Scotland in it and hopefully they vote with a bit more thought about going to the left or to the right depending on their individual circumstances. I think a lot of Scottish folk have voted in the past in such a way that their main thought process is anti London (and I do understand that a little bit or can sympathise with them anyway). I just shudder to think of anyone getting into power north or south of the border that just loads the country up with debt the way in which Blair and Brown did. I do think if it is a Yes result then Scottish economy will suffer in the shorter term until it is set up to go it alone but after then there is no reason it cant be prosperous like Norway and Sweden etc The first thing that should happen either way is to get rid of Salmond and his wind farm ideas...

Only time will tell and not long now.

Just my tuppence

AndyT
 
Norway has a very healthy fish farming industry Gerry. . So do we.

Edit: Sorry Gerry, misread your statement. Thought you said Norway didnt have any fish farms. I could have deleted my reply, but thought I'd keep it all fair.

Den..

Off topic but needs to be corrected..the profits from fish farming may be very healthy as far as the (Norwegian) companies are concerned. However the legacy for the scottish environment is far from healthy. Because the cages are allowed to be in the sea lochs..mostly on the west coast..the effect of huge numbers of fish is that sealice are present in horrific numbers. These concentrations of sealice are ideally placed to intercept migrating two year old smolts passing out through the sealochs from the rivers. The smolts are killed by the massive sealice burden. I have netted the estuary of the R Polla in Loch Eriboll and seen these smolts so affected, carrying dozens of lice. They die. The fish farmers treat their cages with a variety of chemicals, SLICE etc to try and kill off the sealice, but the sealice develope immunity and need to be treated with ever more toxic chemicals.

Additionally, the cages are often torn by weather, seals etc, thousands of farmed fish escape and interfere with the native genetics, that which allows a wild fish to migrate from the burn of its birth, to Greenland and return to the same burn to breed in 2,3 or more years.

You'll find the cages in Norway are in inland contained conditions.

This shocking state has come about due a lack of regulation by the Scottish Government, and more importantly a lack of will to regulate. They have been given the results of study after study, and have ignored them all. Andrew Thin, soon to be ex head of SNH, is conducting a review, at the behest of the Scottish Government into fishery management. Great. Except the effect of fish farming is excluded from his remit. Crazy.

Couldn't run a raffle, let alone a country.
 
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/...-with-the-fish-farming-industry-scot.22833036

Some quotes..

"THE Scottish Government has been accused of being "in cahoots" with the fish-farming industry after public agencies disclosed more than 750 fish farms have been approved in recent years - and only six have been refused."

"The floodgates are being opened across Scotland to salmon-farming pollution, toxic chemicals, infectious disease and sea-lice *infestation. Salmon-farm applications are shamelessly being rubber-stamped as Scottish ministers drive forward their expansion plan."

"Environment ministers should be protecting our marine environment from the pollution caused by these filthy floating factory fish farms." He also criticised fish farmers for shooting seals.

Peter Urpeth, spokesman for Outer Hebrides Against Fish Farms, said the fish-farming *industry was quietly becoming "an arm of government with a privileged and unchallenged right of access." He warned this was "extremely dangerous for Scotland's marine environments".

Just so you know its not just me twining.
 
anyone who knows about fish farming will tell you that after a while the sea bed where the cages have been gets destroyed and becomes void of any life & the natural ph balance of the water is so far out of sync due to the density of fish shit being generated in one place.no one seems to give a flying fuck & before anyone denies this i’ve been there,seen it & would never touch a farmed salmon with a barge pole.They even have colour charts to decide on which colour they want the salmon flesh.
 
Den..

.

Additionally, the cages are often torn by weather, seals etc, thousands of farmed fish escape and interfere with the native genetics, that which allows a wild fish to migrate from the burn of its birth, to Greenland and return to the same burn to breed in 2,3 or more years.

.

Gerrard,

To pick up on one statement which I have never understood, when quoted:

Farmed salmon do not have the same "fan" tail as wild salmon, and I suspect - not the strength and stamina.

It seems that only the most fit and healthy of wild salmon - can make it up the rivers to spawn and fertilise, which keeps the breed strong. I can't see how the farmed salmon can make it up there to interfere with this process?

Thoughts?

Al
 
Al

The farmed fish can and do make it up the rivers...which is why I have to identify on my annual returns the quantity of farmed fish in the catch...luckily rare up here. You are right that the tail fin often distinguishes farmed from wild salmon. However not all salmon go right to the head waters; in the Tay for example a lot of fish breed and spawn in the main river.

Just back in from a brisk Glenshee, Deeside, Cairn o Mount, Kirrie run....first on my new....to me....12hunner. Spot on!! Thats what its all about really!

And now going to find some rose to have with my barbequed steak outside by the conservatory on this sparkling spring evening....who would want to be anywhere else?

G
 
Thanks Gerrard, I was wondering as I was typing - about that scenario. Thanks for confirming.

So - you know about Salmon................ But Rose with BBQ Steak??? :blast

Yeah - the 1200 is (speed, weight and handling at least) better than the predecessor.

Cheers!

Al :beerjug:
 
Thanks Gerrard, I was wondering as I was typing - about that scenario. Thanks for confirming.

So - you know about Salmon................ But Rose with BBQ Steak??? :blast

Yeah - the 1200 is (speed, weight and handling at least) better than the predecessor.


Cheers!

Al :beerjug:

I hear what you say...I would have preferred a decent cru beaujolais or a cornas....or any Rhone really(any of which are available).... but sitting watching the sun....and a wifie who likes rose when dining al fresco.....sorry... Now to finish the evening with a Kilchoman (look it up)...
 
your right,the first is atleast useful as a food source the other is fecking useless.

But which is which? Both are equally slimey.

I'm still voting YES though. Remember all you folks at home, a YES vote is not a vote for the SNP, it's a vote for independence.

We will then have an election for our new government. ( not the government that England votes for like it is now)
 
But which is which? Both are equally slimey.

I'm still voting YES though. Remember all you folks at home, a YES vote is not a vote for the SNP, it's a vote for independence.

We will then have an election for our new government. ( not the government that England votes for like it is now)

It's also a vote for a socialist future. Not the nice cosy Blair Brown sort of socialism but the really scary type that wants to dip your pocket to pay for nationalisation, bigger government and increased benefits for those who choose not to work or those who can't work because they are so out of their heads on methadone and buckie.
 
Sorry ... my turn for a bit cut and paste.

You 'no' guys are so knowledgeable and certain of the future.

I found a wee graph. I'm presuming that its accurate. BT (before thatcher) the percentage of conservative voters was quite healthy enough to provide a decent balance.

If it has permanently changed, one has got to ask why. If it changed because of perceived unfairness dealt to us by an English dominated government, then, with our own parliament there is no reason for it not to go back to what it was.
 

Attachments

  • tory graph.jpg
    tory graph.jpg
    71.8 KB · Views: 95
And now my turn for some cutnshite

http://www.scotsman.com/news/politi...ve-stan-blackley-slams-yes-scotland-1-3382434

From the horses mouth....

"THE formal campaign group for independence is little more than an SNP front, according to one of its former executives."

"Yes Scotland no longer fully reflects the wider groups of people and parties seeking independence, Green party member Stan Blackley said.
“In my opinion, this is just as well, as that organisation has become little more than an SNP front in recent months, which is ironic given the amount of effort that was put into fighting that perception in the early days.”

So much for a yes vote not being a vote for the SNP
 
And now my turn for some cutnshite

http://www.scotsman.com/news/politi...ve-stan-blackley-slams-yes-scotland-1-3382434

From the horses mouth....

"THE formal campaign group for independence is little more than an SNP front, according to one of its former executives."

"Yes Scotland no longer fully reflects the wider groups of people and parties seeking independence, Green party member Stan Blackley said.
“In my opinion, this is just as well, as that organisation has become little more than an SNP front in recent months, which is ironic given the amount of effort that was put into fighting that perception in the early days.”

So much for a yes vote not being a vote for the SNP

Earth-shattering news..... :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom