1200 reliability

I have raised this exact point a number of times in the past. You are paying for a "Bayerische Motoren Werke" yet we get a Berlin product. Yes the quality of workmanship in Berlin is much worse.. the entire work ethic of Berlin is very poor compared to Bavaria. Its a different world. GDP / capita in Berlin is HALF what it is in Bavaria (despite enormous subsidies for the past 60 years), and theres a damn good reason for that.

BMW moved their production to West Berlin in the late 1960s (from Bavaria) due to a big attempt (read subsidies) from the German government to try desperately to stop West Berlin sliding into an abyss of economic uselessness. It was still a net recipient of over 4 billion DM a year in aid even by the late 1980s. Incredible when you consider it had barely 2 million people.

By the way, its not that the 12 is made in Berlin ...ALL BMW motorbikes are made in Berlin. I am looking forward to the new Chinese engines they will use in some of the bikes going forward, cause I have little doubt they will be more reliable than the Berlin ones.

Its not just that the labour that goes into the bikes relies heavily on economic underperformers and gastarbeiters, the engineers that go the motorcycle division are hardly the "premier cru" of the annual BMW graduate engineer intake either. Everytime the motorcycle division needs to solve a performance problem, they refer to the smarter, better equipped guys in the car division. If they need to squeeze a few more horsepower out of an engine, they will later happily boast that the automotive engineers redesigned the heads.

I spose its understandable, as the bike division generates barely 2% of the annual sales of the car division. If you are BMW, where are you going to put your top new engineers? Designing / Refining the cars? or the bikes?

Its also been pointed out before, but economically there is no real value to BMW to keep making motorcycles. Whats the point spending so much time, resources and money to maintain a division that adds 2% to the sales of the car division, a division that itself is growing 10% a year? The whole bike division production is worth a about 2 months of the new growth in the car division. They only do it as a link to the past. BMW has made motorcycles and motorcycle engines since WWI, and they want to maintain that link with their heritage. Again that implies they will throw minimal resources at it. Bikes are not a key strategic part of BMWs growth. Its just a symbolic token.

One thing surprised me a lot a couple of years ago when I did the BMW off road training in Hechlingen in Bavaria, (the main off road BMW school globally and where all of BMW's off road instructors globally are trained). I asked the instructors there if they had any input into the design or refinement of the bikes. I asked if the designers ever consulted them about what would be useful, what would work, what do they think about riding positions, gearing ratios etc ... nothing. The very good riders at BMW's main off road training centre have no contact at all with the designers just down the road in Munich. I found that startling, and a waste of excellent resources within BMW. This further confirmed my view that they are just designing bikes to meet marketing specifications, not to "build a better bike".

Thats just the way it is I guess. We still end up buying the bikes right?

This will sound a little racist, not meant at all and I have more German friend than brits having worked for German companies for 17 years.

As I understand it the 12 is made in a new factory in Berlin. I think its fair to assume that this factory is in the former East Germany and is probably there due to subsidies from the German government. BMW formerly made there bikes (I assume) in Bavaria, southern Germany in particular Bavaria and Schwabia are the home of Germanies engineering heart and craft skills (BMW, Benz and Porche are all there)

Could we be seeing lower quality in new bikes because of less well trained staff and work ethics of former eastern workers...?

Now I know this will piss off our German members, but its a valid thought I think... Maybe Nemisis has some background on this view?
 
I have raised this exact point a number of times in the past. You are paying for a "Bayerische Motoren Werke" yet we get a Berlin product. Yes the quality of workmanship in Berlin is much worse.. the entire work ethic of Berlin is very poor compared to Bavaria. Its a different world. GDP / capita in Berlin is HALF what it is in Bavaria, and theres a damn good reason for that.

BMW moved their production to West Berlin in the late 1960s (from Bavaria) due to a big attempt (read subsidies) from the German government to try desperately to stop West Berlin sliding into an abyss of economic uselessness. It was still a net recipient of over 4 billion DM a year in aid even by the late 1980s. Incredible when you consider it had barely 2 million people.

By the way, its not that the 12 is made in Berlin ...ALL BMW motorbikes are made in Berlin. I am looking forward to the new Chinese engines they will use in some of the bikes going forward, cause I have little doubt they will be more reliable than the Berlin ones.


Sounds like British made cars all a heap of rubbish and now owned by China and India my be the quality will get better:beerjug:
 
Silicon grease slathered over mine.

Recently cut the bottom of my failed one. There was absolutely no sign of water damage or ever having been wet. I'm beginning to wonder whether the units themselves are failing or whether a proportion of failures is simply corrossion in the little connector? Replacing the unit might solve the problem, but it could just be the connector that was dodgy.

One thing against this argument is that mine was changed by a dealer in Austria and I have a little more confidence in them than in the the UK deler network.

I bought a new one yesterday to carry round as a spare. Shouldn't have to, I know, but it makes me feel slightly happier to know there's a spare in the top box...


from what i can tell, most failures are water ingress damaging the lower connector.

i think some fail in other ways though.
 
from what i can tell, most failures are water ingress damaging the lower connector.

i think some fail in other ways though.

hmmmm .. has anyone ever had 2 fail? As in the replacement has failed as well?

(I am trying to work out if I need to carry a spare one?)
 
Rusape Wrote:



IMHO that's complete bollox!!!

You've got a Harley - you talk about brand image :o

Indeed I have,... but I am under no illusion about its shortcommings and I don't defend Harley's just becuse its a Harley.. if its crap its crap and there are lots of things wrong with Harley! I've had them for the last 10 years, but reliability has never been one of their problems..

BMW are supposed to be better than everything else..... BMW tell us so....
But they are not... accept this fact, but don't continue to defend them as the pinnacle of bikes with no reliability issues!
 
Indeed I have,... but I am under no illusion about its shortcommings and I don't defend Harley's just becuse its a Harley.. if its crap its crap and there are lots of things wrong with Harley! I've had them for the last 10 years, but reliability has never been one of their problems..

BMW are supposed to be better than everything else..... BMW tell us so....
But they are not... accept this fact, but don't continue to defend them as the pinnacle of bikes with no reliability issues!

I have never seen one post here which has said BMW bikes are perfect most just get on and know that nothing is made perfect. All manufactures say they have the best product.
 
BMW are supposed to be better than everything else..... BMW tell us so....
But they are not... accept this fact, but don't continue to defend them as the pinnacle of bikes with no reliability issues!

Yet more utter bollox!!

You know nothing of my attitude. I've had four of these bikes with no problems; that allows me to have an opinion based on personal circumstances.

Upon what is your drivel above based?
 
Bollox and Drivel

Yet more utter bollox!!

You know nothing of my attitude. I've had four of these bikes with no problems; that allows me to have an opinion based on personal circumstances.

Upon what is your drivel above based?


Bollox and Drivel.... Why because you don't agree?

Now that's arrogance.

So you have had 4 bikes with no problems, and that is great, but that is not the sentiment or indeed experience of many on this forum who own BMW. My comments were not aimed or directed at you in the first instance, nor did I claim to know anything of your attitude.

BMW have acknowledged that there are problems and many owners on here have posted the same. My observation was that Individuals defend their purchases (warts and all), because they have bought into a brand image, and in so doing overlook and defend the marque regardless.

I am entitled to express my opinion as you are yours, but I'd stop short of describing what you write as bollox and drivel.
 
hmmmm .. has anyone ever had 2 fail? As in the replacement has failed as well?

(I am trying to work out if I need to carry a spare one?)

Yes!! I'm on my third. The first one failed after 18 months, the replacement which I was assured was fitted with the new gasket to seal the lower connectors then failed in less than 1 year ( out of warranty ) Now on my third, and my fourth is in my topbox ready and waiting.
 
My only concern is that THIS bike is the only one I have had that has caused me to show concern as the problems are safety related.
Its my third beemer amongst 17 other bikes of different makes, and I've been riding for 37yrs.

I think this bike is to smart for what it is.
 
Yes!! I'm on my third. The first one failed after 18 months, the replacement which I was assured was fitted with the new gasket to seal the lower connectors then failed in less than 1 year ( out of warranty ) Now on my third, and my fourth is in my topbox ready and waiting.

Bugger ... best I get me a spare then. :mad:
 
Fuel pump relay - when fitting ensure the seal is sitting correctly around the perimeter seat. Seems some of the early units overheated but some suffered corrosion due to water ingress, the later model won't overheat but still needs to be fitted correctly:augie
 
Bollox and Drivel.... Why because you don't agree?

Now that's arrogance.

So you have had 4 bikes with no problems, and that is great, but that is not the sentiment or indeed experience of many on this forum who own BMW. My comments were not aimed or directed at you in the first instance, nor did I claim to know anything of your attitude.

BMW have acknowledged that there are problems and many owners on here have posted the same. My observation was that Individuals defend their purchases (warts and all), because they have bought into a brand image, and in so doing overlook and defend the marque regardless.

I am entitled to express my opinion as you are yours, but I'd stop short of describing what you write as bollox and drivel.

My attitude, and yes criticisms, are based on personal experience. Just because I've had no failures doesn't make me blind to the experiences of others - I have seen a fuel pump contoller fail and an antenna ring. :(

What I object to is someone regurgitating the same non-value adding comments - I've owned a BMW since 1980 and haven't "bought into brand image" ..... that's insulting coming from someone who hasn't got a BMW.

Yes you are entitled to have an opinion. :aidan
 


Back
Top Bottom