ktm520 said:Compared to the standard (and better) 1200 it looks .... well.........Fat!

Meath said:There's short review in MCN about it, they seem impressed and reckon it's suprisingly good off road. They also say that the standard 1200 is a womans bike compared with it![]()

legger said:But Micky were are not aloud them till monday, Bm policy![]()
legger said:But Micky were are not aloud them till monday, Bm policy![]()
GS_Mad said:I think that is because they need time to clean your bike. I seriously saw a new 1200 gsa out in the rain on Friday afternoon in York. Looked great.
Nick Marshall said:saw the 1200 gsa today for the first time... o dear... looks like a std 1200gs has been to halfords..... whats your view? nick
Nick Marshall said:saw the 1200 gsa today for the first time... o dear... looks like a std 1200gs has been to halfords..... whats your view? nick

schwarz baron said:Oh dear, we are all entitled to our opinions![]()
Nick Marshall said:saw the 1200 gsa today for the first time... o dear... looks like a std 1200gs has been to halfords..... whats your view? nick

Gonzo said:I just don't get the excitement about the Adv. Styling changes, a bigger tank and a higher price. Previous 12GS critics are now smitten. Didn't take much, did it?![]()
But then I don't get 4x4 cars for the urban poseur either. I would choose another 5-series instead of an X5, as the latter is a styling exercise based on the former's chassis, with poorer economy, a higher price, less interior space, dodgier handling(although not bad for a big machine, I will concede), minimal off-road ability and a dubious image. So why would you choose one?
It's about style, image and ego rather than true ability.........as it is with the 12Adv.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
