kevtherev
Registered user
Coool:
Ohh dear, come on bmw even honda are kicking yourass
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDXUmCmggpA&feature=related

I had a jota back in the late 70s and that was top heavy but probably lighter than the GS...
I find the whole "more power Scotty" quite confusing when it comes to bikes like the 1200GS/A. I have a sports bike with loads of power and the ability to hit 180mph any time I ask it so its not like I have never had power to know what its like. So that said (and this is an honest question) why do some people feel they need another 20-30 BHP?
For one it would totally destroy any off road ability as you would never get grip unless your very experienced or lean on electronics heavily. On the road, I personally just don't feel the need for it. I don't want to do 180 on a bike like the GS/A, it can already just about hit double the legal UK limit. Isn't that enough for a bike that to be blunt is a bit of a barge? Right now the front wheel has an appetite for the sky when loaded and I can't see that getting any better with more. It isn't even as if its slow off the mark either. OK it doesn't rocket off into the distance like a sports bike but its not supposed to. People already complain about the fuel consumption on them and that's not going to improve with more power.

Cos most GSers dont have another reference point in their garage (ive an S1000RR) and will fall for their annual 2-3bhp marketing bull cos they think it will actually help. In reality its an fat traily which wont be anything other than that. How anyone thinks a few bhp more will make any noticeable difference to that reality is beyond me.![]()



Here it is Looks interesting
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qNJLsU1BMVI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


