Another WC test ride - Underwhelmed

Deleted account 211025001

Registered user
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
8
Reaction score
10
Having cancelled a couple of times I finally got around to a two hour test ride today out of Pidcocks.

I'm gonna bung up a proviso here to put stuff into context;

My current bike is an '05 1200 which I've had from new. It's at 50k miles now and has full fat Wilbers, full exhaust, fuel controller and is generally pretty well sorted 'for me', like a pair of comfy old shoes.

I bought her because I felt it was such a move on (in a direction that worked for me) from the previous oil heads and at last there was a GS that was more or less built for me :)

I am not into knocking new stuff, actually far from it, as I try to make clear above and have had times where I've been equally non plussed and bored of the constant slagging of 1200's by some peeps as I guess some of you guys may feel of some of the comments about the WC and............because of that...........I nearly didn't write any of what's to come as my overall impression of the bike was one of being completely underwhelmed by it and I don't want to be seen as just another knocker of the bike.

So, please take this as intended; I am being as objective as possible, I have no axe to grind and, probably most importantly, most of my comments are made in the context of what works for me not as an absolute.



The bike was a 3,000 mile TE and ridden through busy Saturday shopping traffic, on fast flowing roads, M-way, fast back roads and knarley gravely back roads. Oh, and some un-metaled tracks (but hardly off roading).



I love the look of the bike, much prefer it to mine. The wheels are I think gorgeous and the exhaust is actually pretty good for a standard set up and sounds lovely. I'd not bother swapping out the exhaust unless it was to sort the whole system without the CAT. On the subject of the exhaust, every time I started the bike there was an initial rasp of the exhaust as if I were giving it a quick blip on start up (except I wasn't). This sounded great to me, anybody else notice that? I did wonder if it was programmed to do that or maybe I just imagined it...............

Build quality - well, I'm not sure what I expected but going by what JB and a few others have said I was expecting something pretty special and a return to the 'glory days of WMB' quality. Well, sorry, I just don't get it. The quality was fine but didn't seem any better than my 1200 (which I have no issues with). Some stuff was better thought out (screen adjustment for example) but better quality :nenau
In fact, I did have some quality issues with the WC; some of the welding was I thought pretty poor, especially on the sub frame (eg foot rest hangers and the diagonal spar above them). The indicator switch was horrible, kept feeling like it was gonna break off and hard to get to (too long a reach). The mode button also kept sticking and I had to wack it to get it to do anything. There was also quite a bit of corrosion already evident. More than on my 50,000 mile bike - a few, but not exhaustive examples:

Front caliper hose





Front caliper mount bolts



Exhaust nuts/studs already rusted, why not use stainless/domed?



Quite a few bolts/nuts on the bike were looking like this



Front discs



Riding it - Wow, what an engine :bounce1
On start up I was very surprised by the mechanical racket. Noisier than my 1200 and any of my Guzzis for that matter, I wasn't expecting that. The engine revs very freely and feels much more like a parallel twin than a boxer. The clutch feels like any other wet multiplate clutch does, I actually wouldn't describe it as lighter than the traditional dry clutch as such though, just more progressive and definitely nicer. The engine is far more tractable and you can trickle along in quite high gears. Pretty much gone is the constant feathering of the clutch in slow moving city traffic - nice :)

Once out on the open road I switched from Rain to Dynamic and that's where it stayed. The rush of power was, initially very addictive. The way it revs and builds speed, the way it will pull in any gear and the mid range torque is a real step change on from my bike taking it into fast road bike territory. FWIW though I found I got very used to it very quickly and soon felt very comfortable with it. I did find myself wondering if it may become a bit tiresome when out bimbling two up? I guess you'd just switch it to Normal or Rain if that was the case? Anyway, for hooning it was spot on.

The gearbox is clunkier than mine which really surprised me, especially in the lower gears. Maybe it will smooth out with miles as mine did?

Handling - Mmmmmmm, this was the biggest disappointment for me. The bike certainly fitted me well (6ft and seat on high setting) with the bars feeling about right. It defo feels lighter and slightly quicker changing direction at low/normal speeds. When getting a proper move on though on fast flowing roads it needed more effort to get it to change direction than mine. Once you got it to start moving it reverted back to being nice and light and took little effort to keeping it moving a bit more or a bit less.
I put the ESA on Hard (which is where it stayed) which helped but still felt more sluggish to turn than my bike. I like quick steering bikes and was disappointed. I also couldn't get my head around the apparent quick yet slow at different speeds steering :confused: Anybody out there understand what I'm on about or experienced it :nenau

I thought the shocks were a big improvement on the usual OEM but not as good as my Wilbers (hardly surprising really), well controlled but lacking some of the subtlety.

Brakes were much of a muchness, a bit less initial bite but a bit stronger when really pulling up sharpish.

Bits'n'bobs - I found, when getting a move on and with the balls of my feet on the pegs that me heel kept getting tangled up with the centre stand.

I got the right peg down a couple of times :eek: , are the pegs a bit lower or does the new bike just handle so much better? ;)

No storage space under the seat (and if you look closely in the picture the ECU? was starting to corrode



Also, there is now no 'level surface with the panniers' when you remove the rear seat. Something I use a lot when on my own on the bike (strapping down soft luggage across back and panniers). Also, looks like you cant mount the top box where the seat is :nenau:nenau

Erm, what else..............all the different buttons and modes and......and......and......just don't do it for me, sorry.

So, that's my ramble just about over.

For me to trade up I'd need to sell my GS and find £10k and there is not even a small bit of me that thinks it's worth it when, for me, my current bike is so good.

I've also had a good think about that lovely engine and, at the risk of sounding like some of the dinosaurs on here I'm not sure it's in the kind of GS territory I want it to be in. It's lost that creamy build of power of the oil heads and is more frantic. It's almost moved into fast road bike territory and yet if I wanted a fast road bike I'd buy something with a bit more power and do it properly. On that level I'd rather be done with it and do it properly with a lot more power, such as with the 1190 KTM (test ride in a week and a bit :bounce1).

I think I was expecting the step change to be similar to the 1150 to the 1200 but what I actually rode was a bike that was faster but was no 'better' for that and in some respects was actually not as good as my 1200 :nenau

Andres
 
I guess being a demo bike it gets washed down and that's about it no acf50 etc. With only 3000 on the clock and not long from launch why can't they use some decent stainless bolts and fixings.
If they can't afford to fit them at manufacture :rob offer them as an extra as there are various extras though nice are far from needed,thinking of my bike TPS,white led indicators etc:blast

Perhaps BMW could call it there british climate pack :D
 
I guess being a demo bike it gets washed down and that's about it no acf50 etc.................

Perhaps BMW could call it there british climate pack :D

British Climate Pack - I like your thinking :D

TBH mine is ridden all year round (and is currently white with dried salt) and doesn't get ACF'd and some of the corrosion on the WC was worse than mine.

Andres
 
Good write up Andres. :thumb2

The discs look like the ones on my Harley. Rust traps :D

It doesn't look like it's even been washed down between rides... nasty :(

Wouldn't stop me probably buying one in a few years mind. :)
 
British Climate Pack - I like your thinking :D

TBH mine is ridden all year round (and is currently white with dried salt) and doesn't get ACF'd and some of the corrosion on the WC was worse than mine.

Andres

Mines 2yrs old and also and used all year.I have yet to de acf50 it this year so I have yet to see what lurks beneath :eek:
 
Everything is faster on the LC top speed acceleration braking corrosion the lot.

No seriously it looks like the bike has not had the salt washed off and left to rot hardly a fault with the bike, to quote a saying "They all do that sir"
 
Everything is faster on the LC top speed acceleration braking corrosion the lot.

No seriously it looks like the bike has not had the salt washed off and left to rot hardly a fault with the bike, to quote a saying "They all do that sir"

The bike was very clean so had defo been washed down on a regular basis. Did you read my comment about the state of my bike which has less corrosion on the the same parts as the WC :nenau

Andres
 
Excellent write-up . I have not ridden one yet but somehow from all the other write-ups and opinions I think I might just agree with you. The GS lost a lot of the agricultural feel ,call it character ,when it changed from the 1150 to 1200 and although I have had a couple of 1200s since an 1150 I dont think I really want to get further away from the feel of the TC I have currently. If I wanted a faster ,smoother ,better handling bike there are loads out there that would do the sporty thing better but I dont wish to go back there again. Obviously most of you on here ,and all those that have laid out their hard earned will disagree ,but its a free world
 
The bike was very clean so had defo been washed down on a regular basis. Did you read my comment about the state of my bike which has less corrosion on the the same parts as the WC :nenau

Andres

It does not take long for fittings to corrode and once they have cleaning the bike wont bring them back ride the bike in the wet on a Friday this time of year and washing it on a Monday morning will be too late.

Clean when you rode it does not mean it has been cleaned every ride.
 
Great write up Andres and I have the same thoughts as you it would seem.
I've only had my 1200 about a year so still getting used to it. Only passed my test in 09 so still wet behind the ears. I'm no racer and if anything ride too conservatively but I'm happy with that.
I'm a short arse and the low seat wasnt quite low enough for me so there was a confidence thing to start with. I felt the riding position was, how can i say this, I felt like i was on top of the bike rather than part of it, if that makes sense. :nenau I wouldnt have been pushing it as hard as most riders due to confidence and the fact there was ice on the road when i took it out, mine was being serviced so used the WC. Basically my findings were that yes the bike went really well but there's no way i could justify paying that sort of money. What did bug me was the fact the GPS mount covered one of the clocks which was annoying, the display was very cluttered and the controls didnt seem user friendly, I realise you get used to all these anomalies though.
 
Nice write up and good to see from a seasoned 1200 rider. Where's the battery gone? If the ECU is under the seat...

Just been out to the garage and my bolts/discs have similar corrosion but mines also done over 40k (2006 GSA) and gets ridden all weathers. No acf50 treatment and gets washed maybe twice a year ( I hate cleaning cars/bikes)
 
Good write up

I haven't even bothered going to have a look at the new one let alone ride it.

I don't want to go faster, my current GSA goes as fast as I want it to for what sort of bike it is. The new headlight looks cool but I rarely ride at night so how it performs is immaterial.

I quite liked the twin cam GSA when I rode that but it wasn't worth the extra £4k to change, I feel the same about this bike
 
Fixings/bike has the look of being cleaned with an aggressive cleaner like muc-off or similar, lot of dealers use that type of cleaner.
 
I saw my first WC at Barrie Robsons in York last week - didn't ride it.

It looks really nice, I liked some of the details and it is no doubt an improvement over my 2005 R1200GS.
However, I know without asking that I will not be able to afford to swap and I don't believe that I would travel significantly quicker on the more powerful model-I probably ride too fast on the one I have.

I love the look of it and I think the headlight(led) looks great.

I always had a low opinion of those who defended the 1100 against the newer 1200-but I now understand a little more.
Give me a WC and I'll ride the t*ts off it but I'll be just as content with my 2005.:aidan
 
I went for a test ride today (....the dealer has been pestering me for ages)...

I totally agree with your comments, they were very much along the way I was feeling.

Firstly, I have to state that I had a bad cycling accident two years ago, and this was only my second time on a bike in those two years....so I wasn't the sharpest, so I'm not a good judge of the handling ..I didn't push it.

But I've read the views and reviews, on here, and in the press, with great interest.

But I have to agree, I was overwhelmed too....

I was never going to swap my GSA for this bike, but I might consider it when the Adventure version comes out. But I'm not anti new models..times change.

Firstly, it is very quick..like a GS Sport....but is that what Gs riders want?...I don't.

I agree that the indicator switch seems small and fragile...I prefer the old system..or would have preferred a more robust switch.

I thought the speedo numbers were too small too, and agree that the finish just looked ok.

The bike does looks good, but it's not my cup of tea.

I was actually more impressed with the R1200 RT in the shroom :augie

Totally agree with your post, and a great review :thumb2
 
I am also waiting to demo the new GS. But so far, it hasn't got under my skin enough yet. I too wasn't impressed with the quality of the dealers demo bike and it was starting to look rather cruddy. Still, I know how bad BMW's reputation suffered with the 1200 and I also know I look after my bikes to a very high standard, so something that doesn't look so good won't sway my opinion too much. I still think the quality of the KTM, from what I've seen on both dealers demos, is a tad better. But most of all, I've just been looking at the new Triumph Tiger Sport and I really really like the looks of it. So all three will have to be ridden, but I know I'm alrerady thinking that the Tiger will suit my riding style more.
 
ARE YOU SURE GOT ON THE RIGHT BIKE and just didnt climb back on yours:thumb

...I liked it,,, and I have an 07 1200...which I will keep....

BUT ....................................Thats along with an LC...LUCKY ME
 
Thanks for the review Andres :thumb2

I know exactly what you mean about trading up for power and doing it 'properly'.

The only thing I really miss on my GSA is a decent rush of power. It's been Hilltopped and has a quick action throttle but it still aint 'quick' :D Something like the 1190 would possibly sway me, but then would it be as good as the GSA on those dry dusty Spanish trails :nenau (probably better!!).

That aside though, I'm still pretty happy with my 2010. It's pretty smooth, I can sit on it all day, and it does pretty much everything apart from go seriously quick.

Give us your feedback on the 1190 next week ... !!

:beerjug:
 
I keep putting off asking for a demo despite being pestered but may do so just to see......:augie Nice honest write up Andres:thumb2

The build quality will never be the same as the 11**'s due to cost and difference in paint. It's the same for everyone I think. In the bikes defence, it's been used through the hardest winter for a while with more salt on the roads than ever before.
 
I keep putting off asking for a demo despite being pestered but may do so just to see......:augie Nice honest write up Andres:thumb2

The build quality will never be the same as the 11**'s due to cost and difference in paint. It's the same for everyone I think. In the bikes defence, it's been used through the hardest winter for a while with more salt on the roads than ever before.

If you think of your TAT tours ... How do ya reckon something like an 1190 would compare to a GSA ... ???
 


Back
Top Bottom