Paul Rochdale
Registered user
FAU? Why? They present a set of case papers to the CPU and they decide if there is sufficient evidence to proceed. Clearly they thought it was one person's word against another. Perhaps had they got a crystal ball, there would have been more evidence?
I'm puzzled by the first post as there seems so little damage, he could sort it out himself at almost no cost. Why bring insurance companies into the equation unless he wants his next premium to go up? I would never, ever contact an insurance company unless we're talking about thousands of £ worth of damage.
It reminds me of the time when on a small ferry crossing a river along the Dutch coast, my R100/7 rolled forward off it's centre stand, even though the river was as still as a mill pond. I didn't know this at the time and when a Dutchman who spoke no English tried to explain that he'd righted the bike, I ignored him. Minutes later when riding off the ferry, I noticed the mirror had swivelled round. No damage anywhere else.

I'm puzzled by the first post as there seems so little damage, he could sort it out himself at almost no cost. Why bring insurance companies into the equation unless he wants his next premium to go up? I would never, ever contact an insurance company unless we're talking about thousands of £ worth of damage.
It reminds me of the time when on a small ferry crossing a river along the Dutch coast, my R100/7 rolled forward off it's centre stand, even though the river was as still as a mill pond. I didn't know this at the time and when a Dutchman who spoke no English tried to explain that he'd righted the bike, I ignored him. Minutes later when riding off the ferry, I noticed the mirror had swivelled round. No damage anywhere else.

