swebb
Guest
I see this from a couple of perspectives...
ON the one hand, we have the "stick BMW for everything we can" attitude being shown.. (not saying that's what you are doing, but some see it that way)... This has the potential of making an expensive bike, even more expensive... I promise BMW will not accept a loss on the sales of.... well anything really....
On the other hand I see the "BMW sell themselves as being a cut above the rest, and they have the nerve to produce motorcycles that rust..." attitude...
I myself do believe in making companies produce a bit of substance to back up all the hot air that the carpetbaggers (apologies to any in sales who take offense =) spend all that effort to create... Not sure if rust is my way... every old BMW I've ever seen is well corroded (like any bike).. not like they've suddenly started making them worse in that regard...
Personally I'll be fixing my own rust (off warantee... only one year in The Netherlands)... But then I don't expect something made of steel and aluminum not to corrode if ridden in the wet...
Al...
All fair comments, my only addition would be that I don't expect there to be zero corrosion and certainly don't expect the bike to grow old in showroom condition, it was bought to ride after all. 7,000 miles in though isn't a lot for there to be quite large areas (50 pence piece size) in the centre of the rear wheel "hole" though. (excuse me for my ignorance in not knowing the correct part name, mechanically i know nothing about bikes)
Oddly, the frontal areas that I had expected to show corrosion, have been replaced with no question, the one area that I thought should not have corroded and therefore thought would be more likely to be replaced is the area that BMW Warranty dept are rejecting... a certain irony me thinks.



Having read all the posts and Swebbs obvious dis-content, he has of course like a lot of people missed the whole point in the warranty saga.
