eisen77
Registered user
After magically making my PR4 GT rear look like a square pancake after so few thousands of KM's, i decided it was time to try a new pair of shoes.
The PR4 Trail (front) appeared to have tread and life, however after a VERY quick inspection once off the bike, it too was deformed with flat spots and ripples. In fact, i would wager that the front gave more instability issues than the rear.
So on go the RSIII´s...
So far, i can confirm that they are MUCH stiffer than the PR4´s. Even installing them was a totally different experience than the Michelins.
Of course new rubber always makes for a ´new´bike, but i can say that the Dunlops felt secure and natural from the moment we set off.
I did not feel the need to gently scrub them in or test them; just went straight to familiar roads and started to enjoy them.
They do give more feedback and the bike rolls into corners with enthusiasm. The profile is quite round (i.e not V) so there is no sudden fall into a corner, just a nice constant roll with plenty of confidence. They are definitely stiffer (as i said) and bump absorbtion is not as good as the PR4´s. They transmit a lot more of the road back though the chassis. However, i do not see that as a negative.
So, that is my mini-review after 60km on dry roads.
I am interested to see how they handle wet/slimy roads, filtering on uneven surfaces and of course....wear.
** If i had to offer one piece of advice for those GS/GSA owners only wanting PR4´s: personally, i would stick to a trail/trail (front and rear) matching set.
The GT was fine, but i preferred the bikes handling while on trail/trail.
With a trail/trail setup, the bike felt more compliant and did not try to resist rider input during sweeping corners or fast roundabout exits like with the GT.
From DAY 1 of putting the GT rear handling was OK & the bike never protested, but it never felt right either. Hard to explain - but I hope it makes sense !
Here are some pics of the Dunlops...
The PR4 Trail (front) appeared to have tread and life, however after a VERY quick inspection once off the bike, it too was deformed with flat spots and ripples. In fact, i would wager that the front gave more instability issues than the rear.
So on go the RSIII´s...
So far, i can confirm that they are MUCH stiffer than the PR4´s. Even installing them was a totally different experience than the Michelins.
Of course new rubber always makes for a ´new´bike, but i can say that the Dunlops felt secure and natural from the moment we set off.
I did not feel the need to gently scrub them in or test them; just went straight to familiar roads and started to enjoy them.
They do give more feedback and the bike rolls into corners with enthusiasm. The profile is quite round (i.e not V) so there is no sudden fall into a corner, just a nice constant roll with plenty of confidence. They are definitely stiffer (as i said) and bump absorbtion is not as good as the PR4´s. They transmit a lot more of the road back though the chassis. However, i do not see that as a negative.
So, that is my mini-review after 60km on dry roads.
I am interested to see how they handle wet/slimy roads, filtering on uneven surfaces and of course....wear.
** If i had to offer one piece of advice for those GS/GSA owners only wanting PR4´s: personally, i would stick to a trail/trail (front and rear) matching set.
The GT was fine, but i preferred the bikes handling while on trail/trail.
With a trail/trail setup, the bike felt more compliant and did not try to resist rider input during sweeping corners or fast roundabout exits like with the GT.
From DAY 1 of putting the GT rear handling was OK & the bike never protested, but it never felt right either. Hard to explain - but I hope it makes sense !

Here are some pics of the Dunlops...
