Gearbox Mods . . :

Voyager

Well-known member
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
Nov 11, 2006
Messages
2,157
Reaction score
2
Location
Kirkliston, Scotland
We seem to have lost the Technical Sub-section, so I'll just start another Techie thread here.

I recently rebuilt 'Bumpmuncher's' R100GS Gearbox as it was knackered and thought that some pics and thoughts might be of general interest.

From the symptoms described, it sounded as though the front output shaft bearing was worn. One cause of this is the fact that under certain conditions, the propshaft can draw the output shaft back, pulling the shaft through the front bearing.

The bearings are pressed onto the shafts and the bearings are shrunk into the end cases, so hauling the shaft back against the rear case leaves a lot of axial preload on the bearings.

Ball bearings are designed to take radial load so this side force causes them to fail. The tell tale signs being steel swarf in the oil and on the magnetic drain plug.

When stripping the box, the speedo drive and output drive flange are removed and then the 5mm socket-headed set screws around the rear cover are removed. If there is excessive pre-load on the bearings the end cover will pop open at this point.

Bumpmuncher's cover didn't do this.

After heating the end cover, removing the gear selector mechanism and heating the front of the box, I was able to remove all the shafts.

The front bearing had moved and there was about 1mm of clearance between the rear of the front bearing and the shoulder that it bears against. The reason that there was no pre-load was apparent - the bearing was like a baby's rattle :D. The box had a lot of swarf in it as well. Given that we shim these boxes to 0.05mm clearance, having 1mm of float is bad news.

The front bearing on the Intermediate shaft was worn as well, but wasn't as bad as that on the Output Shaft.


The 'cure' for this is to fit a circlip into the Output Shaft, outboard of the front bearing. This prevents the shaft being drawn back.

My local Engineering works ground a circlip groove in the shaft for me. They must look forward to my visits as this was the 4th they have done - at £50 a time :blast (When I get my lathe up and running I intend to do this myself).

This is the finished product, The groove can be seen and there is still some Engineers Blue on the shaft:


DSCN3386.jpg



When the Output Shaft is assembled, the modified front looks like this:


DSCN3396.jpg



One problem with the front bearing shifting is that it allows fifth gear to float on the shaft. Fifth gear is fixed and third gear is moved into and out of engagement with it by one of the three selector forks. Having excess clearance means that the engagement dogs are not fully 'home' and are therefore under increased pressure.

Bumpmuncher was lucky, his gear pinions were OK. however to show what can happen, here is a pair of pinions from my spare box. The bearings had worn to the extent that fifth gear was machining the inside of the case and the rider was having to hold the bike in gear on the lever. The 3rd gear / 5th gear dogs are shot and the selector fork was blackened with heat. Not nice.



DSCN3418.jpg



You can see how the edges of the webs in the 3rd gear pinion (on the left) have worn to a 45 drgree angle and the edges of the 5th gear dogs are similarly worn.



A tip I picked up from one of the 'Gearbox rebuild' sites is to replace the nylon Indexing Roller on the selector mechanism with a pukka bearing. This is a Type 6882Z bearing of 8mm (ID), 16mm (OD), 5mm (Depth). Its supposed to give crisper changes and is a mod I've done on both my gearboxes.

I'll be interested to hear Bumpmuncher's opinion (I did clear it with him first :D).

I also replaced three of the selector springs while I was in there.

The completed selector mechanism. The Indexing ball bearing can be seen located in the First Gear detent on the right.


DSCN3394.jpg



Now a question for the experts :bow :bow :bow

The roller cage on the Input Shaft front bearing on Bumpmuncher's box appear to show signs of overheating - see below.


DSCN3406.jpg



It looks as though the rollers have overheated and their pins that engage in the bearing cage have heated the cage.

Any ideas about the cause ? ? ?


I have replaced four of these roller bearings and the other three don't exhibit these marks:


DSCN3408.jpg



Possibly 'burning the clutch' would cause this as there were no signs of lack of oil in the box. In fact, the internals were in very good condition.

This bearing sits just behind the input shaft clutch splines, with an oil seal in between, so I think that is the most likely cause.

The oil seal looked OK (I replaced all seals as a matter of course).


I await the collective response with interest.


Bob
 
Great write up Bob. I think you deserve a :bow:bow:bow

Kenny must have deleted the Tech section when my back was turned...He does things like that and then denies any knowledge of it - "I dint do nuttin" :D

This is one I swapped. Somebody had rebuilt the box on the cheap, made a gasket out of newspaper and used the original shims preloading the bearings. This badly overheated bearing was the result - even the ends of the roller bearings have worn. The bearing on the other end of the input shaft collapsed completely.

thinking back. I'd say that most of the gearbox failures I've seen have been down to stunts like this, selector springs breaking or wear thats probably caused by not changing the oil or using the wrong grade. I've seen a couple of broken gears on 77/78 bikes.
 

Attachments

  • bearing.jpg
    bearing.jpg
    86.3 KB · Views: 742
Brilliant and easily understandable steps [so far]
Looking forward to the next episode.:thumb
By the Way, remember Kenny is a Scouser,:blast he's probably "sold" the Tech section :augie
 
Brilliant and easily understandable steps [so far]
Looking forward to the next episode.:thumb

Thank you for the plaudits.

I had been intending to do a full step by step strip & rebuild article - but someone beat me to it. I guess it has now gone down with the Technical Section (was it torpedoed or scuttled ? :D).

I don't have a box to strip at the moment and I'm not sure that I have enough photos of previous builds to make a full article. Do people really want another 'how to' from someone on the lower rungs of the ladder ? ? ?

Logically, for this re-build, the next episode is Bumpmuncher riding his bike :thumb2

Bob.
 
I have rebuilt a few boxes and do the machining myself for the circlip

boxMedium2.jpg


I have also done the bearing conversion on the selector
But i am not so sure about this mod it's no doubt stronger and more reliable but i recon it makes the gearchange not so sweet so i have stoped doing it now and just out a new nylon bush in
 
I have also done the bearing conversion on the selector
But i am not so sure about this mod it's no doubt stronger and more reliable but i recon it makes the gearchange not so sweet so i have stoped doing it now and just out a new nylon bush in

I found the same Garry :thumb2
 
Hi,
Looking at the circlip / bearing part, I wonder if there needs to be a spacer under the circlip to make sure the bearing inner-race id relief does now dish it when loaded axially ?
 
I have rebuilt a few boxes and do the machining myself for the circlip

I have also done the bearing conversion on the selector
But i am not so sure about this mod it's no doubt stronger and more reliable but i recon it makes the gearchange not so sweet so i have stoped doing it now and just out a new nylon bush in

Garry,

1. Do you use a normal cutter in the lathe ? I had always imagined that the shaft would be hardened and not easily turned.

I believe my local Engineering Works grind the circlip groove.

I have a Denford Viceroy lathe that I am currently refurbishing. I am hoping it will be able to cut the circlip grooves (but not as a training exercise).


2. I know what you mean about the change and think its probably due to the cam plates being stamped out. The detents are a bit crude and the bearing doesn't sit in them cleanly. The nylon roller is more adaptable.

I find mine OK once the bike has warmed up but first to second can be a bit of a pig when cold.

I won't give up on it just yet and am interested to hear other people's experiences.

I have a couple of old nylon rollers that are rather mis-shapen, so they do seem to wear and need replacing periodically.


Bob.
 
Hi,
Looking at the circlip / bearing part, I wonder if there needs to be a spacer under the circlip to make sure the bearing inner-race id relief does now dish it when loaded axially ?


I had wondered about that too, but BMW just fitted a plain circlip so I guess it works.

BMW stopped fitting the circlip sometime in the mid-'80s and then re-introduced it in the early '90s. Paralever bikes built between these dates can have problems - hence the retro-fit of the circlip.

I have never really understood the cause of the problem as, if the bike is used hard off-road and the suspension drops sharply, any excess movement in the drive shaft should be taken up by the splines at the bevel end.

I guess its just the weight of the drive shaft, plus the inertia, that causes the gearbox output shaft to be dragged backwards.

And why doesn't the drive shaft shunt the gearbox output shaft back into line when the bike lands and the suspension bottoms out ?

Questions . . questions.

The circlip mod adresses the effect rather than the cause :blast


Bob.
 
If you look carefully at this pic from the first post in the thread you can see that the bearing you have used has a large radius on it behind the circlip...
I think this is unsatisfactory because the bearing is not seating on the circlip properly...Just on the tangs
If you load it hard the circlip will distort because the bearing is not butting up againt the circlip by the shaft...
BMW used a special bearing that has a very small rad on it...But you try getting one

I get round this by maching a top hat that has a rad on it that matches the rad on the bearing and place it between the bearing and the circlip ( I will try and find a pic of one )
It is a wright pig to turn as it's very thin and you have to part it off the correct legnth because once parted you can't hold it anymore :blast

DSCN3396.jpg


Tool i use to cut the grove is very high quality solid carbide
and yes the shaft is hard

The bearing moves from the axial loads caused by the helical gears on the shafts
Not the drive shaft in my opinion
 
BMW used a special bearing that has a very small rad on it...But you try getting one

Tool i use to cut the grove is very high quality solid carbide
and yes the shaft is hard


As always, there is more to this than meets the eye.

By 'special bearing' do you mean the FAG bearings that are fitted as standard - or is there another type that is used when circlips are factory fitted ?

I'll have a close look at the old FAG bearings in the morning.


I thought the shafts were hardened. I was expecting to need some form of milling head, with a thin carbide rotary cutter, attached to the cross slide.

Interesting to know that a carbide parting cutter will work.

I have a lot of learning to do before I attempt something like that.

Thanks for your input.

Bob.
 
The bearing moves from the axial loads caused by the helical gears on the shafts Not the drive shaft in my opinion

Garry (or anyone else),

I've been thinking about this (well, raking up industrial quantities of leaves is rather boring :D).

I'm sure I've read somewhere that the problem only affects Paralevers.

In which case there is probably another layer of complexity here.

Post '81 airheads have the same gearbox, those made '83 to 94 (?) won't have the circlip factory fitted.

Paralevers were introduced with the 100GS.

So, is it the 1,000cc motor that is causing the problem when used in the GS frame ?

Or does the problem affect 80GS' as well ?

Or did (eg) the older 100RT Monolever bikes suffer the same problem ?

I can imagine that a GS gearbox gets a harder life than an RT or RS one as its more likely to be used off-road. But is that the full story?

Or is there something about the Paralever set-up that is causing the output shaft to move inside the gearbox ?

Thoughts anyone ?

Bob.
 
Last edited:


Back
Top Bottom