FatBob
Well i took one of the above mentioned out for a bit of a test ride the other day. Left me a bit confuse i think.
First of all let me say, the bike in question had some sort of conversion on it with V and H pipes and was bored out to 107 cu inches... a right big bugger!
First impression, once i got used to finding the foot pegs somewhere at the front was that let the clutch out and you feel this almighty pull. Stomping torque. The gearbox, i thought, was suprisingly good. Bit aof a clunk, but engages easily enough.
My first concern tho was the brakes. Best described as wooden, and at worst, non existant.
But once you get used to braking alot earlier than you would on a normal bike......!
The handling was a revelation. I was suprised at how it tipped into corners, held its line and felt stable. With all of its available stomp and the handling, i was soon acting the hooligan!!
On normal A and B roads, i found that snicking it into 4th and just pottering along, was how it really liked to be ridden. I took it up on to the A3 to see what it could do, and although capable of ton+ speeds, you need a neck like Arnie and the grip of a gorilla to hang on!! Again, i would suggest about 80 - 85 was the max for any sort of distance work on big roads.
Overall, i liked the experience. I think it looks a million dollars. Big, hard, cool, low, and a real muscle bike. The seating position you get used to very quickly, and the sound when you open it up is enough to blow the skirts off the local female population!!.One disapointing thing i thought, was the headlamps. Its a twin lamp unit, but with one being high and the other dipped. Would be sooooo much cooler if they both came on together.
Would i have one? Well i aint got the thick end of 11k for a bike that i would ride for 40 - 60 days a year. If money no object and gargae was big enough....Feck yeah i'd have one!!!
