KTM 950 Adv S - one year in

Tobers

Well-known member
UKGSer Subscriber
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
2,055
Reaction score
106
Location
Guildford
Thought I'd report back a year after swapping my 2004 R1200GS for a 2004 KTM 950 Adventure S (in superior GO!!!! blue & orange livery).

Stats so far (approximate!)

Total miles on the bike: 22k
Miles done by me in a year: 10k
Services: 1 big one (valves etc) £300, 1 small one £140ish
Consumables: Tyres: 1 rear Scorpion, front still OK, £80 ish. New chain & sprockets approx £140 - sprockets were fine but went for a 16 tooth front for more go!!!!

What's gone wrong:

Clutch slave cylinder gave out. Replaced by me for £80. Fairly common issue by all accounts. Suggest some preventative maintenance if you are nearing 20k miles, or buy the Evoluzione one which is better. Had the same issue on my Aprilia RSV.

Rear brake. Master cylinder replaced under warranty (3 year warranty) at last service. There is a technical service bulletin on the rear brake so take your bike in and they'll put a new one on for you. Had the same issue on my Aprilia RSV as well!

Occasional engine stall when hot - traced to kinked vent hose and sorted at service.

Totally unbiased owner's opinion :D

The KTM is a more "dynamic" bike than the GS. By this I mean that it is more involving, responsive, feels faster. The small amount of off-roading I've done shows it to be superior to the GS from a suspension and handling perspective and it feels easier to ride, but to be honest I've got nowhere near testing it "properly" off road.

The KTM definitely attracts more attention, being rather massive and with GO!!!!! written down the side in big letters. Lots of grins and thumbs-up from people. It is a pretty monstrous bit of kit and lots of people comment on how purposeful it looks. Ugly as sin though. The GS is quite anonymous by comparison and there's a lot of them about.

With carbs, the fuelling is just superb. No jerkiness on/off throttle, putting the power on is sublime. Fuel injection is pants.

Tank range isn't as good - I get about 185 miles compared to 230 with the GS. The KTM has a 22l tank (same as the GS??).

The KTM brakes aren't as powerful as the GS's servo assisted ones. This is a drawback but you just need to squeeze the lever harder. It'd be interesting to see how much quicker the GS stops. However, I've got more confidence in the KTM brakes than the GS ones having had 2 servo failures on the GS.

It's an easier bike to work on in some respects. Anything drivetrain related is simple as anything. Suspension, electical etc is also easy. Oil changes are a bit fiddly if you do the whole thing with cleaning of both oil screens, but this only really needs to be done once a year in major services. Valve adjustment is much harder compared to the sticky-out bits the GS has.

Build quality seems really very good. The bike cleans up really well. Just got a few spokes that are going a little with all the salt, but they polish up well. All other kit is pristine.

Things I miss about the GS are the smoothness and saddle comfort. Sometimes the KTM is a bit too much (cold winter morning) and I think a GS might be better. I've got heated grips on it, so it's not that, but it's more to do with the amount of feedback (noise, vibes, suspension movement) coming from the KTM being much larger than that of the GS which can be a bit much if you just want a quiet life. On the other hand, this is a positive of the KTM the rest of the time when it is really involving. Also, the GS saddle is more comfy than the KTM - I dont have a gel seat so the one I've got is a bit hard. A tour to the Pyrenees in a couple of weeks will reveal all I've no doubt.

Other stuff - all the bits I had on my GS are now on the KTM. The Autocom is wired in, 2-way radio sorted, ipod & phone rigged, GPS on & powered, heated grips sorted, heated vest power available.

Hope this is helpful to someone.

Cheers

Tobers
 
Nice write-up! :thumb2
I've also had my 950 adv for a year now and your summary is spot-on. Like you, there are the occasional days when I miss the more solid and relaxed ride of my old 1150GS, but, like I said, only occasional... :green gri

A few other points from my experiences -
- Regarding seat comfort I use an Airhawk pad, 500 mile days no problem now.
- Other than the seat pad, the other fantastic (and free!) mod was changing to the 'Sport' suspension settings from the manual = more feel at the front end.
- The panniers are :eek: wide!
- I still have the standard pipes fitted, which are actually loud enough and burbly as is. I have heard that aftermarket cans help the bike run cooler, but it's only an issue for me on really hot days in traffic, so I haven't bothered changing.
- The standard Pirelli Scorpion tyres seem OK, but I'll probably use the airhead for off-road stuff (when it's finished :augie ) so when the Scorps wear out I'm changing to Avon AM26 Roadrunners.
 
I've got titanium Akra's on mine. The standard ones really weigh a lot. I'm not kidding here - they are seriously heavy. They are also major heat-sinks, staying really hot for hours after you switch off.

Replacing them with Akras makes the bike much easier to put on the centre stand (!!), I'm sure improves the handling as you're not swinging umpteen kilos from side to side, makes the bike run cooler in traffic, and stops your legs/thighs getting heated up. A very worthwhile change in my view.
 
cracking write up.:thumb
let us know how you fare on your trip:)
 
Just sold my 1150 adventure and will be getting my 950 S in just over a week :thumb2 (04 in GO colours )

Love my KTM 525exc the build quality is brilliant and it takes such a beating !!!!

the only thing I can add is the 950's are physically bigger than the 990's

The futures Orange the futures bright :cool: :cool:
 
Bloody hell, it's flipped a mod.

No regrets buying mine either. The 07 990 FI is OK but some owners don't agree.

The 990's seat is as comfortable as a GS. Pillion probably not, though. A high screen for less than £90 cures another deficiency between the Adv and GS.

Is it a better bike? I can see how anyone could go either way but I like it more so far. Both bikes have character but only the KTM has attitude.

Still, getting a puncture might put me off...
 
Hey Tobers,
I enjoyed your write up of your first year with your KTM.....I took a liking to one of these at the Edinburgh Bike Show in March......they seem to have so much individuality and character . AND they are much lighter so I could contemplate one realistically!
maybe I'll test-ride one at some point......enjoy!
Thanks
IQ
 
The KTM definitely attracts more attention, being rather massive and with GO!!!!! written down the side in big letters. Lots of grins and thumbs-up from people. It is a pretty monstrous bit of kit and lots of people comment on how purposeful it looks. Ugly as sin though. The GS is quite anonymous by comparison and there's a lot of them about.


Tobers

I pressme you mean a standard GS12 as opposed to an ADV...:confused:

There certainly 'aint many ADV's where I live and it's hardly 'anonymous'
 
Ive only had my 950 for a few months, and it is a flippin awesome bike, with one caveat: its no good for pillions (well at least not my girlfriend).

Kind of spoils it really, as we do like to go for little trips here and there. :(

One other thing, and Im sure its just me and where I ride, but Ive had three punctures on the rear tyre - THREE! The tyre is borderline legal, and I do ride along some very back roads (all three punctures were by nails/screws). Id like to stick to Scorpion's, but is a thicker inner tube a good idea - what about blow outs?

TBH, I am looking at a 12GSA as that has the same out of the box type performance plus good comfort for the pillion. I read what Tober's says about the reduced input too, and that does go both ways. Its likely to come down to money, a new or nearly new 12GSA costs an awful lot more than the 950 I have in the garage...

Mike
 


Back
Top Bottom