Rukka Warranty

We as a retailer I think are going to go down the route of not actively selling Rukka jackets & trousers. We'll serve people if they want Rukka gear, and whilst the product itself is quite excellent in most circumstances (hence how they got to where they are today) - if there's a problem, and trust me we get a huge proportion of problems with Rukka compared to other brands - it's a nightmare to deal with.

Rukka Warranties are sent off to Rukka in most circumstances, meaning you'll be without it for 6 weeks plus, and whilst you might get a loan garment in the meantime, there's so many rules around this it kind of gets ridiculous.

I was at a dealer meeting on Tuesday this week, speaking to the guys at Dane. Their products seem as good or if not potentially better than Rukka (although they don't have the extensive range) however their warranties are dealt with in such a better way. The pricing is slightly cheaper than Rukka and in all honesty, it seems like it's going to be a much better experience for the customer long term.

In fairness, they only offer a 2 year warranty, but if anything is going to go wrong with the jacket - it'll be within the first 2 years with the kind of hard use this type of product is going to receive.

With this warranty on the cuffs, the problem is most likely exposed velcro on gloves which has scratched away at the material so in fairness, no fault of Rukka's and wouldn't be classed as warranty. Now for me this is quite normal and I'd expect them to reject the warranty in this particular circumstance however for me where they let themselves down is they'd then void the warranty on the whole jacket... because you've had the sleeve repaired... so if you had a zip fault later down the liner you've got yourself a problem, which is WILD. I do'nt know if that's Rukka's stance, or Tranams stance, but their returns team is particularly brutal and seems to lack some common sense at times.

We've been an avid Rukka supporter for years, and I think many people are moving away from the brand for these silly reasons, something which could be dealt with so so much better with good duty of care and understanding from the sipporting distributor.

There's plenty of alternatives out there on the market for premium motorcycle clothing. Dane, Klim, Held, Revit and many more.... Rukka/Tranam need to be careful going forwards as it'll just lead people to spend their money elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
I wish there was an Irish "Dane" stockist.
Looks like fantastic kit.

Xiaomi M14U
 
Pictures.
Do you tuck your glove cuffs into the sleeves? I’d be inclined to say, that it is velcro tabs on your gloves that have caused that.
I can’t see that being Rukka (TranAm) quality issue.
 
Do you tuck your glove cuffs into the sleeves? I’d be inclined to say, that it is velcro tabs on your gloves that have caused that.
I can’t see that being Rukka (TranAm) quality issue.
Yes I do. Now I realise! I know it does not come under warranty but do not want to void my warranty hence asking for a repair that they would accept. We shall see!
 
Tried emailing Rukka on their euro email addresses and getting back postmaster undeliverable messages! Pretty naff really.
 
We as a retailer I think are going to go down the route of not actively selling Rukka jackets & trousers. We'll serve people if they want Rukka gear, and whilst the product itself is quite excellent in most circumstances (hence how they got to where they are today) - if there's a problem, and trust me we get a huge proportion of problems with Rukka compared to other brands - it's a nightmare to deal with.

Rukka Warranties are sent off to Rukka in most circumstances, meaning you'll be without it for 6 weeks plus, and whilst you might get a loan garment in the meantime, there's so many rules around this it kind of gets ridiculous.

I was at a dealer meeting on Tuesday this week, speaking to the guys at Dane. Their products seem as good or if not potentially better than Rukka (although they don't have the extensive range) however their warranties are dealt with in such a better way. The pricing is slightly cheaper than Rukka and in all honesty, it seems like it's going to be a much better experience for the customer long term.

In fairness, they only offer a 2 year warranty, but if anything is going to go wrong with the jacket - it'll be within the first 2 years with the kind of hard use this type of product is going to receive.

With this warranty on the cuffs, the problem is most likely exposed velcro on gloves which has scratched away at the material so in fairness, no fault of Rukka's and wouldn't be classed as warranty. Now for me this is quite normal and I'd expect them to reject the warranty in this particular circumstance however for me where they let themselves down is they'd then void the warranty on the whole jacket... because you've had the sleeve repaired... so if you had a zip fault later down the liner you've got yourself a problem, which is WILD. I do'nt know if that's Rukka's stance, or Tranams stance, but their returns team is particularly brutal and seems to lack some common sense at times.

We've been an avid Rukka supporter for years, and I think many people are moving away from the brand for these silly reasons, something which could be dealt with so so much better with good duty of care and understanding from the sipporting distributor.

There's plenty of alternatives out there on the market for premium motorcycle clothing. Dane, Klim, Held, Revit and many more.... Rukka/Tranam need to be careful going forwards as it'll just lead people to spend their money elsewhere.
Good summary. I will never buy Rukka again for sure. If they cant deal with the small things, then they will lose cistomer support. I expect i will get it sorted myself and be careful with the gloves I use from now on. 😀
 
If someone could spare the time to take them to task on the warranty, and what they should be doing to make the item fit for its purpose, I think they would win. The design could easily be adapted to stop it happening, making it fit for purpose. seems they don't care. TBH I had some Rukka trousers that were supposed to be waterproof, they weren't. I replaced them with another premium brand, whose trousers were waterproof, then I bought more stuff from the same brand. Simples, that's the way it works, no more Rukka.

TBH the Dane stuff does look good, and whoever I speak to about them says the same thing.
 
If someone could spare the time to take them to task on the warranty, and what they should be doing to make the item fit for its purpose, I think they would win. The design could easily be adapted to stop it happening, making it fit for purpose. seems they don't care. TBH I had some Rukka trousers that were supposed to be waterproof, they weren't. I replaced them with another premium brand, whose trousers were waterproof, then I bought more stuff from the same brand. Simples, that's the way it works, no more Rukka.

TBH the Dane stuff does look good, and whoever I speak to about them says the same thing.
My "mid range" Rev'it jacket(s) have a more sturdy material inside the sleeves for maybe 100mm for this very reason.

It's not rocket science.
 
Just had a email from lunta.com for a customer satisfaction survey but no reply to the original email! Weird.
 
My "mid range" Rev'it jacket(s) have a more sturdy material inside the sleeves for maybe 100mm for this very reason.

It's not rocket science.

Exactly! They don't need to employ a genius to work that one out. Should develop based upon feedback from warranty claims. Honour the claim and inform the customer that they will take action, no brainer, you would buy again if it was dealt with this way. Let's face it, all OP wants is a repair, the cost of this would easily be recovered by retaining business.
 
Thanks for all your advice. No response from Rukka. Gave up trying to contact them. One thing for sure, i will look at other companies when I come to replace it!
 
I bought a Rukka jacket and trousers about 10 years ago, they had an offer of 6 years warranty at the time. The trousers leaked in the crotch area the first weekend that they were worn. The dealer where I purchased them agreed to return them for inspection, but Rukka told them to send the trousers to Goretex as they offer a lifetime warranty. They came back after several weeks and Goretex reported that they were tested and there were no issues. I refused to take tham back, so the dealer sent them to Rukka. They also reported that there were no issues. I contacted the UK importer and they weren't interested. I then slated Rukka, Goretex and the dealer on social media. The importer asked the dealer to contact me and make me an offer, which was to let me buy the latest pair of trousers at the dealer cost price. I also refused the offer as I wanted either a full refund or my trousers made watertight. I got nowhere with this and I would never buy another Rukka suit again, they are overpriced and the warranty doesn't exist.
 
Thanks for all your advice. No response from Rukka. Gave up trying to contact them. One thing for sure, i will look at other companies when I come to replace it!

Now that you have given up on Rukka and (presumably) have therefore given up on any future warranty, have the cuffs of your jacket attended to. Contact a reputable repair / alteration company, who’ll no doubt be able to do the job. This assumes the piling bothers you enough, to have it dealt with.

My own choice would be Hideout Leather, who provide a tip-top service.
 
Thanks for all your advice. No response from Rukka. Gave up trying to contact them. One thing for sure, i will look at other companies when I come to replace it!
The new Halvarssons kit is very good BUT unfortunately the same UK importer as Rukka , there are numerous manufacturers out there making kit that is just as good if not better than the recent Rukka range .... Stadler, Dane ,Halvarssons, the higher spec Richa, Held ,Modeka to mention just a few .
My 15 yr old Arma S jacket is much better quality than my 5 year old Orivesi 2 but to be honest I have almost exclusively used my Lindstrands Sunne jacket and trousers in the past 3 years ( 2 layer laminate, very well vented, and so far 100% waterproof and well made )
 
Now that you have given up on Rukka and (presumably) have therefore given up on any future warranty, have the cuffs of your jacket attended to. Contact a reputable repair / alteration company, who’ll no doubt be able to do the job. This assumes the piling bothers you enough, to have it dealt with.

My own choice would be Hideout Leather, who provide a tip-top service.
Agreed. Hideout replaced the zip in my Rukka jacket. Fantastic workmanship - service - experience. Highly recommend.
 
I bought a Rukka jacket and trousers about 10 years ago, they had an offer of 6 years warranty at the time. The trousers leaked in the crotch area the first weekend that they were worn. The dealer where I purchased them agreed to return them for inspection, but Rukka told them to send the trousers to Goretex as they offer a lifetime warranty. They came back after several weeks and Goretex reported that they were tested and there were no issues. I refused to take tham back, so the dealer sent them to Rukka. They also reported that there were no issues. I contacted the UK importer and they weren't interested. I then slated Rukka, Goretex and the dealer on social media. The importer asked the dealer to contact me and make me an offer, which was to let me buy the latest pair of trousers at the dealer cost price. I also refused the offer as I wanted either a full refund or my trousers made watertight. I got nowhere with this and I would never buy another Rukka suit again, they are overpriced and the warranty doesn't exist.
Genuinely that is a sad story to read. I bought my first ever Rukka set of jacket and trousers (Armas) back in 2010 soon after I transferred up to The Met with a 64 mile bike commute each way. So it got properly abused and it was utterly brilliant. Nothing ever failed I kid you not and I have only just bought a new jacket (Kingsley) as that original just needed "retiring". I swear by it and as a result of my original purchase the bikers off my team were all Rukkerd up within the year.
 
I bought a Rukka jacket and trousers about 10 years ago, they had an offer of 6 years warranty at the time. The trousers leaked in the crotch area the first weekend that they were worn. The dealer where I purchased them agreed to return them for inspection, but Rukka told them to send the trousers to Goretex as they offer a lifetime warranty. They came back after several weeks and Goretex reported that they were tested and there were no issues. I refused to take tham back, so the dealer sent them to Rukka. They also reported that there were no issues. I contacted the UK importer and they weren't interested. I then slated Rukka, Goretex and the dealer on social media. The importer asked the dealer to contact me and make me an offer, which was to let me buy the latest pair of trousers at the dealer cost price. I also refused the offer as I wanted either a full refund or my trousers made watertight. I got nowhere with this and I would never buy another Rukka suit again, they are overpriced and the warranty doesn't exist.
I have had a Rukka Navigator suit for 10 years. When I bought it, some of the stitching on the leg was a bit adrift. They loaned me a pair of trousers and repaired my own ones. The suit has been 100% waterproof and still going strong.

Maybe the quality has gone down hill. For everyone who doesn't buy Rukka anymore, there are 1000s who still do.
 
I bought a Rukka jacket and trousers about 10 years ago, they had an offer of 6 years warranty at the time. The trousers leaked in the crotch area the first weekend that they were worn. The dealer where I purchased them agreed to return them for inspection, but Rukka told them to send the trousers to Goretex as they offer a lifetime warranty. They came back after several weeks and Goretex reported that they were tested and there were no issues. I refused to take tham back, so the dealer sent them to Rukka. They also reported that there were no issues. I contacted the UK importer and they weren't interested. I then slated Rukka, Goretex and the dealer on social media. The importer asked the dealer to contact me and make me an offer, which was to let me buy the latest pair of trousers at the dealer cost price. I also refused the offer as I wanted either a full refund or my trousers made watertight. I got nowhere with this and I would never buy another Rukka suit again, they are overpriced and the warranty doesn't exist.
Can’t speak for Rukka’s warranty as I’ve not needed to use it. I have used the Gore-Tex warranty on a pair of Hein Gerick trousers that leaked, they refunded the purchase price. Great service as the trousers were at least 9 years old & probably more than 10 and used for more than 50,000 miles. I didn’t even have the receipt.
 
10yr warranty on Stadler kit. Not tested it though.
I returned my Stadler trousers as they were leaking. M Legends did all the tests, sent it to Lancashire sports repair. Confirmed leaking. As not a manufacturing default, it was passed to goretex...Gore agreed, offered me a voucher for what I paid. I got the pants at a huge discount due to a M legends website mess up..bottom line, voucher was 50% of new stadler pants, so I now use Richa. Basically, manufacturers are so good now, they wont really suffer that failure, its going to be a goretex issue
 


Back
Top Bottom