i,m sure iv,e seen photos of para outfits on here , anybody got a link or some photos .
.

You`ll struggle with getting a decent lower rear sidecar chassis mounting on a bike with a single sided swinging arm...ie Monolever or Paralever.... because of the absent bit of frame loop where the pillion pegs would have gone.
Look where your PD pillion pegs are for illustration and compare with the sidecar mountings.
It`s feasible of course,but will likely need a very strong 'subframe' section.
, cause the rear fitting's fit on the main frameNot sure what is meant here, cause the rear fitting's fit on the main frame
and should'nt go anywhere near the sub-frame or pillion peg bracket.

What I was saying is clear if you read my post properly.
I was saying that the rearmost main frame point on the PD is perhaps a tad forwards of the ideal postion for the rear lower fixing,as opposed to the mounting on a twin shock chassis...as per on my Urals.
I was not saying to use the PD pillion peg bracket or the PD subframe as they`re clearly not up to the job.
P.S. Your link`s no good.......not accessible to non P & S members.![]()
It's from a twinshock, so its different
Nick
Nick
I know that...
I also know that Mono/Para combos have been done.
I was originally enlightening 'Toadjam' as to the differences between the twinshock chassis he`s on about and the bike he owns.
I do still reckon that the lower rear mounting is a bit forwards of the ideal on the Mono/Para ones which have been done,however.
Nick
I was originally enlightening 'Toadjam' as to the differences between the twinshock chassis he`s on about and the bike he owns.
I do still reckon that the lower rear mounting is a bit forwards of the ideal on the Mono/Para ones which have been done,however.
I'm still in the dark as what you mean.
The 'mono' main frame look's to me the same as my twin shock main frame (I have both). The only difference I can see is the sub-frame and swing arm.
What is it I'm missing?
wats a non p+s person ????![]()