Any particular reason you are hanging around here if you think BMW's are so terrible
Actually, I was contemplating buying a GS, either a twin cam or a new LC. Like anything I buy, I want to do some research before I part with my money.
I, probably like many others, tempted by marketing and clever advertising.
At the moment, reading all the threads on here and you have to admit, there are a great percentage of posts relating to poor quality, break downs, serious mechanical failures etc etc.
I do detect that even Mr Steptoe, who I assume is an expert on these machines, comes across with a knowingly cynical attitude to these bikes.
As I have said somewhere else, I have a Yamaha Fazer FZ1S, 2008 , done 23000 miles and nothing has gone wrong, despite being thrashed on track, holidays to France, Italy, Germany and Scotland.
No corrosion whatsoever.
I have had a brief ride on a GS and have to say I took to it straight away, but that does not stop me casting an objective eye over the whole matter and have come to the conclusion that the GS is a superb bike in principle but is overpriced, suffers reliabilty problems and the general finish is crap.
When people tell you that they carry substantial spare parts with them when they go touring, and others that would not dare to have a GS without an aftermarket warranty, well, that certainly makes a prospective new buyer think.
I think GS ownership only works without worry when buying new and trading in for another new one before the warranty expires. Of course you are then locked into the whole BMW Buy, trade, service regime which costs a lot.
Oh Yes, please define "Dull" in motorcycling terms.