WEE BOAB
Registered user
How do you get one of these useless things then, will I get one with my AT, the dealer didn't mention it ???


Knowing which side of the equator you are could be very handy .....![]()

What USP does the AT have? I am struggling to see one

You mentioned this before . Why does a motorbike have to have a USP to be any good ?
What USP does a 1200GS have?![]()
Nothing has to have a USP for it to be good, but having a USP differentiates it from the rest and gets it noticed rather than it just being one of the crowd.
How many other manufacturers make boxer twin, shaft driven, telelevered suspended adventure bike?
How many make a twin cylindered, chain driven, conventionally suspended adventure bike?
The GS stands out from the crowd and it works incredibly well.

Nothing has to have a USP for it to be good, but having a USP differentiates it from the rest and gets it noticed rather than it just being one of the crowd.
How many other manufacturers make boxer twin, shaft driven, telelevered suspended adventure bike?
How many make a twin cylindered, chain driven, conventionally suspended adventure bike?
The GS stands out from the crowd and it works incredibly well.


True but you claimed the DCT is not a USP because other Honda models have it. You seem to have forgotten how many other bikes BMW have made that are boxer powered, shaft driven and telelever suspended.
One could equally argue that the Honda is the only 1000cc parallel twin + 270degree crank powered bike making it quite unique in the burgeoning adventure market especially with its 21/18 wheel combo
![]()
Again true up to a point but it's also hard to stand out from all the rest when almost everybody else is riding exactly the same bike.I agree up to a point but put the GS weirdness all together and it clearly stands out from rest - the Honda as nice as it may well be, just does not - its marketing plus is that it is reviving a past icon - which is the fashion at the moment.
Again true up to a point but it's also hard to stand out from all the rest when almost everybody else is riding exactly the same bike.
BMW Have also regularly used the GS history as a marketing ploy when in truth the current LC is about as close to the original as an R1 is to a 350YPVS.
![]()
Again true up to a point but it's also hard to stand out from all the rest when almost everybody else is riding exactly the same bike.
BMW Have also regularly used the GS history as a marketing ploy when in truth the current LC is about as close to the original as an R1 is to a 350YPVS.
![]()
I think you can stand out nowadays without taking a large risk and there lies the rub.
Even if dynamically you might actually have a slightly inferior bike as a result if it makes you smile for whatever you use it for then all is good surely?
Standing out from the other manufacturers machines are concerned often makes a bike successful, success tends to breed success because the revenue is there to develop and refine the design.
When I was in Europe last Summer every other bike on the road seemed to be a GS of one generation or the other.



FFS....
are you lot still bickering in the playground
![]()

Jeez, coming from you of all people![]()
It passes the time of day when you're stuck in the nine to life............................
Andres
