Stay luckyI'm in a JLR vehicle that I've had for 7 years, the fact that I'm looking at another tells it's own story.
Stay luckyI'm in a JLR vehicle that I've had for 7 years, the fact that I'm looking at another tells it's own story.
You kept quite about thatDid I mention it is heavy?
![]()
And there we have it in a nutshell - almost.PCP is allowing people to own things they really cant afford.
This.I think there's a lot of bravado about paying cash for bikes and cars and people if arguing the case need to factor in the lose of interest on your £30 k gs (£5k ish) and the pcp works out cheaper as well as more flexible. I couldn't care less what anyone does but what on earth is wrong with having something you don't have the full amount of money for especially if you only want it for a short period and its cheaper than buying over 3 years.
Absolute nonsense. If you ever try to return a PCP vehicle that hasn’t been properly looked after, you’ll find out why…100% true. I look after all my bikes. They still look new after many years. And that is because of exactly what you say. PCP are loan bikes. and we all know how Loan & rental vehicles are used.
Is this a serious question?What about mileage constraints on PCPs. I know people who have bought with very low mileage allowance who then have to manage how often and how far they ride them. For one guy I met this was pretty much one Euro trip and a half dozen or so Sunday rides.
As an alternative view, I spent a number of years on the board of a (large) airline. We owned 1/3 of our fleet (ie paid cash). Had 1/3 on finance leases (ie personal loans) and 1/3 on operating leases (ie PCP).I work in asset finance
I would never buy a car/bike on PCP
I had my last one for five absolutely faultless years. Now into my second. No luck needed - yetStay luckysir
Is this a serious question?
The choice of mileage you opt for on a PCP is entirely down to you. I’ve seen more than one PCP where the mileage penalties were so low, by far the best idea was to under state the mileage and swallow the penalty.
It’s not complicated, just pick what works for you…
You think so.If I can't afford it i don't have it.I don't need to keep up with the Jones's.Some of us are quite happy moving through life not owing anything to anyone.If I want something newer,I'll put some extra shifts in,save a bit more-I certainly won't be getting credit for anything,no matter what the terms and conditions are.All the “cash-only, every time” bods are talking nonsense.
Great post.As an alternative view, I spent a number of years on the board of a (large) airline. We owned 1/3 of our fleet (ie paid cash). Had 1/3 on finance leases (ie personal loans) and 1/3 on operating leases (ie PCP).
No one way was “right” or “better”. The key was in the balance and the decision on each new airframe and/or engine was made at the point of acquisition, depending on things like how much cash we had sitting around, what else we could do with that cash and the various deals we could get at the time - including the trade-in values.
Yes, I know the parallels aren’t perfect but the principle is universal. It’s about much more than which is the overall cheapest form of ownership. It’s about that irritating little fact of life and business - cashflow - and how you put the cash to work to get the best outcome for you personally.
You do seem to get a bit of a holler than thou attitude from certain people, with regard's to paying cash though.You think so.If I can't afford it i don't have it.I don't need to keep up with the Jones's.Some of us are quite happy moving through life not owing anything to anyone.If I want something newer,I'll put some extra shifts in,save a bit more-I certainly won't be getting credit for anything,no matter what the terms and conditions are.
I sleep easy,have savings and don't really need anything more than I have.But thanks for telling me its nonsense.