GSW GEAR SHIFTING

ATG

Registered user
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
My first statement and disclaimer is that I don’t claim that the GSW gear changes and/or finding neutral to be perfect!
In fact, after getting my 2012/13 GSW after having owned 3 different GS 1200 (2005/2006 and 2011, all premium models ) ridden for some 160.000 Km ( some 100,000 miles) I can say I was pretty disappointed to, otherwise, the best GS of the bunch.
I wrote nasty letters to BMW in Brazil, bitched a lot at the dealership, read everything there was to read on GSPOT and UKGser and tried everything I’ve learned on these forums (lowering clutch fluid level, lowering engine oil level, changing the gear shift lever for a Wunderlich model, adjusting very carefully the gear shift position, burning a little the clutch, riding the bike and learning what is the best way to change gears on the GSW. In a manner of speaking I was for quite some time trying to learn how the bike wanted me to change gears…
Overall, after having done all of the above and after riding my GSW for close to 9,000 Km ( some 5500 miles ) I can say that we get along just great: finding neutral is very easy and I don’t even have to look at the dash to check if it is in neutral; gear changes, either up or down, are smooth and just as good if not better than on any of the earlier GSs I owned. Perhaps it is important to mention that my mileage was mostly done in heavy city traffic, some 70% of the total, and this type of riding is, perhaps, similar to twice as much road riding.
Lowering both oil levels and clutch burning helped a bit. Careful adjustment of the gear shift lever to my own preferences and body shape, also. So did changing the gear shift lever for a Wunderlich lever that allowed me to have a shorter gear lever but with the same throw as the original . All these together helped a lot in making neutral very easy to find.
In the beginning, say for the first 1500 Km (1,000 miles or so ) it was always going from 1st into 2nd then again into 1st ; it felt like neutral was too slippery and very hard to find. At times I had to play between 1st and 2nd 3 to 5 times to find neutral and the hotter the engine the worst it became. Presently its smooth with the bike either hot or cold; it just makes little or no difference and is, perhaps, better when hot!
Gear changes were never as awful as some claim but always smoother from 3rd gear up.
I really put a lot of thought trying to figure out what could be the problem; was it the clutch ? the gearbox? Both ?
One day, quite many miles ago I thought came to my mind: How would it upshift without using the clutch ? I found that if set at the proper wheel/engine speed for each gear it was smooth and noiseless with absolutely no grinding noises.
I suppose if those of you that have noisy gear changes try to upshift clutchless, after a little bit of training, will also find that it is entirely possible to achieve smooth, noiseless gear changes.
If you get to change gears smoothly in this fashion you will, perhaps, exclude the gear box as a problem and the culprit will be the clutch. It is notorious that wet clutches, while longer lasting and prone to withstand quite more abuse, are not as smooth as dry clutches.
It is my opinion that the GSW’s clutch is quite inefficient in its job of disengaging the engine from the gearbox and that is the major reason of the gear grinding that some experience as well as the difficulty in finding neutral and needless not to mention the 1st gear “clunck” when stopped.
The objective of this post this post is to suggest that, perhaps, there is a way to change gears in a similar way as one does when gear shifting clutch less but still using the clutch and, as result, obtaining smoother gear changes.
I came to the conclusion that I had to learn how to change gears in a slightly different fashion in order to overcome the GSW’s clutch limitations. I have noticed that:
1 The higher the RPM I was when gear shifting the more noiseless it became. Perhaps this is not only a result of higher RPM but also due to the fact that when raising RPMs I tended to shift gears in a faster way and therefore did not let the engine’s RPM fall so much.
2 Also, with higher RPM it takes a longer time for the engine to fall down to lower revs.
After these experiments I tried to, when gear shifting , to decrease the rpm in a slower fashion by moving the throttle back slowly in order to do not decrease the engine’s RPM as much during the shifting. All these made my gear changes more similar to when I change gears clutch less and much smoother.
Again, I don’t claim to have fixed the GSW’s innefficient clutch just wanted to present the way I found to make it work in a way that, for me, is completely satisfactory.
Even If these ideas work for only one of you I will have accomplished my objective !
Give it a try, it may work for you too.

Andre
 
An informative report, thanks for posting.:thumb I was speaking to two blokes from BMW uk yesterday, and they also confirmed that the issues are completely clutch related, and not gearbox.

So, clutchless shifting has resolved the issue for you, and BMW are offering a quick shifter on the new RT, so I guess that it will be offered on the GS as well.:nenau

BUT......the bikes should be able to change gear without clutchless shifting, quick shifters, or special techniques to change gear.:rob

We shall see.
 
Nutty,

Just out of interest, what was the basis of your conversation and how did it come about?

Hopefully not being too nosey!
 
Look, I know that there are a few dodgy bikes out there, and I completely understand the frustration of the bods with the dodgy bikes who are at loggerheads with the likes of Engineer in the clacks & crunches thread. :P

I also completely agree, that the box (clutch), aint perfect and that BM could do better.

I (professionally) ride a whole bunch of different bikes, from off road stuff, to FJR's, Blades, GSXR's and of course my staple diet of RT's. And they're all slightly different!!

The FJ - Feck me does that make a racket going into first! It really makes me wince on a cold morning when I put in into gear (I actually do physically wince first thing in the morning!). It's got a real hard (blunt, short, sliding cold steel church door bolt) action about it. I choose my down shifts very clinically on it.

The Blade is a bit tired, it jumps out of gear once in a while - I went into a quick 90mph corner the other month, changed down on the approach and it jumped into neutral :eek: Bloody hell! freewheeling round a bend with no drive what so ever ....

The GSXR is lovely - no complaints at all. It loves a constant rev down change. Keep on the gas (don't shut it at all) Take 5 ..4 ... 3 .... all with the gas still on, and then feed that clutch out - 6th to 3rd and if you were a pillion you'd barely notice we'd just changed by three gears. Beautiful bike.

The RT is woolly. It bangs away and can't do sustained changes like the Gixxer. The twin just isn't smooth enough to deliver that same style. You can feel the movement in the dry clutch - there's no damping in the mechanical movement that oil would give you. It's pretty reliable, but again, has it's own little idiosyncrasies.

The WR's are a nightmare for stalling if you rush into a stop and tap tap tap down the box. I keep the revs up as I bring it down to first.


So (Ha!) it frustrates me that I don't hear or see people doing exactly what Andre is banging on about - working out 'how' their bike needs to be ridden.
I 'get' the old skool mentality of 1150 'journey'. I genuinely do. (I must be getting old :rolleyes:). I get the idea that, say, an 1150 is a better bike than a WC1200 for some. And it's because the WC1200 is a new breed. It doesn't want to bimble. It needs a bit of hooning to get it to work. Andre is absolutely right, that the gear change works better in higher revs, it works better when you get on with it, and it all becomes a bit more slick when you start to ride the bike a bit like a sports bike.

Does that make it a better bike?? No! Not at all. There will be plenty of folk who have had GS's for donkeys years and see this bike as (for them) a real backward step. But BM wnat to rub shoulders with the new 1190, the Multistrada ... and they do! They have achieved that - it's a bloody good bike ....... if you ride it how it wants to be ridden. But if you want bimble round the Dales, enjoy the scenery, have a lazy lunch and enjoy the journey, the bigger picture .... Well, the WC will do it of course, but to be honest, it probably won't do it as well as say an 1150, maybe a Guzzi, maybe an RT.

It's different now! Like it or not, it's a different breed, and IMHO, it wants (needs) to be spanked just a little bit.

You should be dipping the clutch by the tinyest amounts with a preloaded left foot, just as you should be matching your revs on down changes with a blip of gas.

So if you're struggling with the bike and it's gears in particular, don't just slag it off! Step back, and see if there's stuff in your riding that you can do to meet the bike half way. And that's not necessarily a weakness in this bike, all bikes have their little ways, and a half decent rider will soon feel what different bikes want from their rider in return.

(And as a foot note to all that ..... every Honda I've ever owned as been a bloody good reliable bike, but .... ultimately boring. My 1300 Pan was superb - like a fridge freezer! Reliable and predictable to the point of being utterly dull! I want a bike to talk to me, to have some charecter, some soul ....!)

:thumb
 
Hi Nutty GSER;

I am affraid I may not have been very clear in my post when I stated:

The objective of this post this post is to suggest that, perhaps, there is a way to change gears in a similar way as one does when gear shifting clutch less but still using the clutch and, as result, obtaining smoother gear changes.

What I meant to say is:

I do not suggest changing gears clutch less all the time. In fact, my suggestion is for one to practice and learn how to shift clutch less in order to develop a feeling as to when and particularly at what revs to change gears. I believe that once this is mastered gears shoud be shifted using the clutch. My thoughts are that when gears are changed at right timing (speed of shifting x engine revs ) and while using the clutch as a "helper" everything will work in a much smoother way.

Hope this explanation makes it a bit more clear. Sorry.

Andre
 
My first statement and disclaimer is that I don’t claim that the GSW gear changes and/or finding neutral to be perfect!
In fact, after getting my 2012/13 GSW after having owned 3 different GS 1200 (2005/2006 and 2011, all premium models ) ridden for some 160.000 Km ( some 100,000 miles) I can say I was pretty disappointed to, otherwise, the best GS of the bunch.
I wrote nasty letters to BMW in Brazil, bitched a lot at the dealership, read everything there was to read on GSPOT and UKGser and tried everything I’ve learned on these forums (lowering clutch fluid level, lowering engine oil level, changing the gear shift lever for a Wunderlich model, adjusting very carefully the gear shift position, burning a little the clutch, riding the bike and learning what is the best way to change gears on the GSW. In a manner of speaking I was for quite some time trying to learn how the bike wanted me to change gears…
Overall, after having done all of the above and after riding my GSW for close to 9,000 Km ( some 5500 miles ) I can say that we get along just great: finding neutral is very easy and I don’t even have to look at the dash to check if it is in neutral; gear changes, either up or down, are smooth and just as good if not better than on any of the earlier GSs I owned. Perhaps it is important to mention that my mileage was mostly done in heavy city traffic, some 70% of the total, and this type of riding is, perhaps, similar to twice as much road riding.
Lowering both oil levels and clutch burning helped a bit. Careful adjustment of the gear shift lever to my own preferences and body shape, also. So did changing the gear shift lever for a Wunderlich lever that allowed me to have a shorter gear lever but with the same throw as the original . All these together helped a lot in making neutral very easy to find.
In the beginning, say for the first 1500 Km (1,000 miles or so ) it was always going from 1st into 2nd then again into 1st ; it felt like neutral was too slippery and very hard to find. At times I had to play between 1st and 2nd 3 to 5 times to find neutral and the hotter the engine the worst it became. Presently its smooth with the bike either hot or cold; it just makes little or no difference and is, perhaps, better when hot!
Gear changes were never as awful as some claim but always smoother from 3rd gear up.
I really put a lot of thought trying to figure out what could be the problem; was it the clutch ? the gearbox? Both ?
One day, quite many miles ago I thought came to my mind: How would it upshift without using the clutch ? I found that if set at the proper wheel/engine speed for each gear it was smooth and noiseless with absolutely no grinding noises.
I suppose if those of you that have noisy gear changes try to upshift clutchless, after a little bit of training, will also find that it is entirely possible to achieve smooth, noiseless gear changes.
If you get to change gears smoothly in this fashion you will, perhaps, exclude the gear box as a problem and the culprit will be the clutch. It is notorious that wet clutches, while longer lasting and prone to withstand quite more abuse, are not as smooth as dry clutches.
It is my opinion that the GSW’s clutch is quite inefficient in its job of disengaging the engine from the gearbox and that is the major reason of the gear grinding that some experience as well as the difficulty in finding neutral and needless not to mention the 1st gear “clunck” when stopped.
The objective of this post this post is to suggest that, perhaps, there is a way to change gears in a similar way as one does when gear shifting clutch less but still using the clutch and, as result, obtaining smoother gear changes.
I came to the conclusion that I had to learn how to change gears in a slightly different fashion in order to overcome the GSW’s clutch limitations. I have noticed that:
1 The higher the RPM I was when gear shifting the more noiseless it became. Perhaps this is not only a result of higher RPM but also due to the fact that when raising RPMs I tended to shift gears in a faster way and therefore did not let the engine’s RPM fall so much.
2 Also, with higher RPM it takes a longer time for the engine to fall down to lower revs.
After these experiments I tried to, when gear shifting , to decrease the rpm in a slower fashion by moving the throttle back slowly in order to do not decrease the engine’s RPM as much during the shifting. All these made my gear changes more similar to when I change gears clutch less and much smoother.
Again, I don’t claim to have fixed the GSW’s innefficient clutch just wanted to present the way I found to make it work in a way that, for me, is completely satisfactory.
Even If these ideas work for only one of you I will have accomplished my objective !
Give it a try, it may work for you too.

Andre

Absolutely correct - your analysis is excellent, however I never had a big problem finding neutral and I can shift up smoothly from 2,3,4,5,6 using the clutch and almost always 'blip' the throttle on down shifts - I have done over 10,500 miles now and come to the conclusion that the only issue is a bit too much clutch drag, which hopefully can be solved by BMW and then the bike will be 6* bike instead of just 5* :D
 
Look, I know that there are a few dodgy bikes out there, and I completely understand the frustration of the bods with the dodgy bikes who are at loggerheads with the likes of Engineer in the clacks & crunches thread. :P

I also completely agree, that the box (clutch), aint perfect and that BM could do better.

I (professionally) ride a whole bunch of different bikes, from off road stuff, to FJR's, Blades, GSXR's and of course my staple diet of RT's. And they're all slightly different!!

The FJ - Feck me does that make a racket going into first! It really makes me wince on a cold morning when I put in into gear (I actually do physically wince first thing in the morning!). It's got a real hard (blunt, short, sliding cold steel church door bolt) action about it. I choose my down shifts very clinically on it.

The Blade is a bit tired, it jumps out of gear once in a while - I went into a quick 90mph corner the other month, changed down on the approach and it jumped into neutral :eek: Bloody hell! freewheeling round a bend with no drive what so ever ....

The GSXR is lovely - no complaints at all. It loves a constant rev down change. Keep on the gas (don't shut it at all) Take 5 ..4 ... 3 .... all with the gas still on, and then feed that clutch out - 6th to 3rd and if you were a pillion you'd barely notice we'd just changed by three gears. Beautiful bike.

The RT is woolly. It bangs away and can't do sustained changes like the Gixxer. The twin just isn't smooth enough to deliver that same style. You can feel the movement in the dry clutch - there's no damping in the mechanical movement that oil would give you. It's pretty reliable, but again, has it's own little idiosyncrasies.

The WR's are a nightmare for stalling if you rush into a stop and tap tap tap down the box. I keep the revs up as I bring it down to first.


So (Ha!) it frustrates me that I don't hear or see people doing exactly what Andre is banging on about - working out 'how' their bike needs to be ridden.
I 'get' the old skool mentality of 1150 'journey'. I genuinely do. (I must be getting old :rolleyes:). I get the idea that, say, an 1150 is a better bike than a WC1200 for some. And it's because the WC1200 is a new breed. It doesn't want to bimble. It needs a bit of hooning to get it to work. Andre is absolutely right, that the gear change works better in higher revs, it works better when you get on with it, and it all becomes a bit more slick when you start to ride the bike a bit like a sports bike.

Does that make it a better bike?? No! Not at all. There will be plenty of folk who have had GS's for donkeys years and see this bike as (for them) a real backward step. But BM wnat to rub shoulders with the new 1190, the Multistrada ... and they do! They have achieved that - it's a bloody good bike ....... if you ride it how it wants to be ridden. But if you want bimble round the Dales, enjoy the scenery, have a lazy lunch and enjoy the journey, the bigger picture .... Well, the WC will do it of course, but to be honest, it probably won't do it as well as say an 1150, maybe a Guzzi, maybe an RT.

It's different now! Like it or not, it's a different breed, and IMHO, it wants (needs) to be spanked just a little bit.

You should be dipping the clutch by the tinyest amounts with a preloaded left foot, just as you should be matching your revs on down changes with a blip of gas.

So if you're struggling with the bike and it's gears in particular, don't just slag it off! Step back, and see if there's stuff in your riding that you can do to meet the bike half way. And that's not necessarily a weakness in this bike, all bikes have their little ways, and a half decent rider will soon feel what different bikes want from their rider in return.

(And as a foot note to all that ..... every Honda I've ever owned as been a bloody good reliable bike, but .... ultimately boring. My 1300 Pan was superb - like a fridge freezer! Reliable and predictable to the point of being utterly dull! I want a bike to talk to me, to have some charecter, some soul ....!)

:thumb

Wise words :D
 
Look, I know that there are a few dodgy bikes out there, and I completely understand the frustration of the bods with the dodgy bikes who are at loggerheads with the likes of Engineer in the clacks & crunches thread. :P

I also completely agree, that the box (clutch), aint perfect and that BM could do better.

I (professionally) ride a whole bunch of different bikes, from off road stuff, to FJR's, Blades, GSXR's and of course my staple diet of RT's. And they're all slightly different!!

The FJ - Feck me does that make a racket going into first! It really makes me wince on a cold morning when I put in into gear (I actually do physically wince first thing in the morning!). It's got a real hard (blunt, short, sliding cold steel church door bolt) action about it. I choose my down shifts very clinically on it.

The Blade is a bit tired, it jumps out of gear once in a while - I went into a quick 90mph corner the other month, changed down on the approach and it jumped into neutral :eek: Bloody hell! freewheeling round a bend with no drive what so ever ....

The GSXR is lovely - no complaints at all. It loves a constant rev down change. Keep on the gas (don't shut it at all) Take 5 ..4 ... 3 .... all with the gas still on, and then feed that clutch out - 6th to 3rd and if you were a pillion you'd barely notice we'd just changed by three gears. Beautiful bike.

The RT is woolly. It bangs away and can't do sustained changes like the Gixxer. The twin just isn't smooth enough to deliver that same style. You can feel the movement in the dry clutch - there's no damping in the mechanical movement that oil would give you. It's pretty reliable, but again, has it's own little idiosyncrasies.

The WR's are a nightmare for stalling if you rush into a stop and tap tap tap down the box. I keep the revs up as I bring it down to first.


So (Ha!) it frustrates me that I don't hear or see people doing exactly what Andre is banging on about - working out 'how' their bike needs to be ridden.
I 'get' the old skool mentality of 1150 'journey'. I genuinely do. (I must be getting old :rolleyes:). I get the idea that, say, an 1150 is a better bike than a WC1200 for some. And it's because the WC1200 is a new breed. It doesn't want to bimble. It needs a bit of hooning to get it to work. Andre is absolutely right, that the gear change works better in higher revs, it works better when you get on with it, and it all becomes a bit more slick when you start to ride the bike a bit like a sports bike.

Does that make it a better bike?? No! Not at all. There will be plenty of folk who have had GS's for donkeys years and see this bike as (for them) a real backward step. But BM wnat to rub shoulders with the new 1190, the Multistrada ... and they do! They have achieved that - it's a bloody good bike ....... if you ride it how it wants to be ridden. But if you want bimble round the Dales, enjoy the scenery, have a lazy lunch and enjoy the journey, the bigger picture .... Well, the WC will do it of course, but to be honest, it probably won't do it as well as say an 1150, maybe a Guzzi, maybe an RT.

It's different now! Like it or not, it's a different breed, and IMHO, it wants (needs) to be spanked just a little bit.

You should be dipping the clutch by the tinyest amounts with a preloaded left foot, just as you should be matching your revs on down changes with a blip of gas.

So if you're struggling with the bike and it's gears in particular, don't just slag it off! Step back, and see if there's stuff in your riding that you can do to meet the bike half way. And that's not necessarily a weakness in this bike, all bikes have their little ways, and a half decent rider will soon feel what different bikes want from their rider in return.

(And as a foot note to all that ..... every Honda I've ever owned as been a bloody good reliable bike, but .... ultimately boring. My 1300 Pan was superb - like a fridge freezer! Reliable and predictable to the point of being utterly dull! I want a bike to talk to me, to have some charecter, some soul ....!)

:thumb

Excellent:thumb2:thumb2
 
Giles,

No offence mate but your beautifully worded, well thought out, passionate, reasoned and logical post has no place on this forum or any other for that matter.

In future, please keep your common sense to yourself.........
 
Grahamcoxon;

Ah, the british ... Excelent post !

Still I am an optimist and truly believe there is space for serious posts that contribute to betterment of our hobby. We just have to keep on posting !

Andre
 
Giles, I think you have nailed it in one. When I rode the WC it was royally spanked and yep, it changed gear quite beautifully. It is an attempt to please the ex sportsbike fraternity who will ever take it off road. They still want to travel fast, but want a sit up stylee and a bit of comfort for their old bones. Personally I'm not a fan as that isn't what I want a bike for, but as you say, it hits the intended spot no question. It's not a sportsbike, it's moderately fast, and it handles well and that about sums it up. The electrikery is there for the techno loons who will have to press every setting in the system to get it "just right", much like the new breed of M5, hot hatch Renault etc. Me, I'm a rung what ya brung kind of guy and simplicity means I just ride it rather than worrying about whether it could feel more "dynamic"
Each to their own, I'm just glad my 1150 has 200k left in her:D

Stop riding like pussies and enjoy!
 
Giles.....I have read your post and understand your start, middle and end point. You have accredited your opinions by detailing your biking experience. So answer me this. Why are some GS WC's obstructive and others easy peasy when ridden by the same rider over similar roads?

OK, these issues can be accommodated by the rider but why should they be when BMW have demonstrated that they can produce a 'good' bike and the paying punter has stumped up a 'good' £14k or so???
 
Giles.....I have read your post and understand your start, middle and end point. You have accredited your opinions by detailing your biking experience. So answer me this. Why are some GS WC's obstructive and others easy peasy when ridden by the same rider over similar roads?

OK, these issues can be accommodated by the rider but why should they be when BMW have demonstrated that they can produce a 'good' bike and the paying punter has stumped up a 'good' £14k or so???


Ohhh Bloody hell .... I don't know! And I really don't. (I'm also no mechanic by any stretch of the imagination..). And you're right - a spring is a spring and shouldn't be any different from the thousands that are made in a factory, clutch plates should all be identical, push rods ... (whatever one of those is !) you'd like to think that if you took twenty engines apart they'd all be identical. (The only variant I can think of could be fluid levels?).

What I can tell you is this ..

Every Sunday morning we speedo check 12 RT's. Out of the depot, 200 yards down to the roundabout, back on yerself and ride back towards one of the blokes with a speed gun. Back into the garage, jump off bike (Like Marquez in in Phillip Island Australia) and do it again on another ... and then another ... and then another ..
Bloody hell! Every bike is different. Smooth changes, walnuts in cheddar changes, tip into the roundabout sweetly, won't turn and wants to go straight on, lovely fuelling, tank full of diesel ... Ooooo this one feels good .... Ahhhhhhhhh ... it's my bike .... like comfey old slippers ...... bloody hell, whose is this - it's awful .... and so on. It always amazes me how different every bike is ... (and of course how each rider gets used to his bike and it's little quirks .... ).

:thumb2
 
Ohhh Bloody hell .... I don't know! And I really don't. (I'm also no mechanic by any stretch of the imagination..). And you're right - a spring is a spring and shouldn't be any different from the thousands that are made in a factory, clutch plates should all be identical, push rods ... (whatever one of those is !) you'd like to think that if you took twenty engines apart they'd all be identical. (The only variant I can think of could be fluid levels?).

What I can tell you is this ..

Every Sunday morning we speedo check 12 RT's. Out of the depot, 200 yards down to the roundabout, back on yerself and ride back towards one of the blokes with a speed gun. Back into the garage, jump off bike (Like Marquez in in Phillip Island Australia) and do it again on another ... and then another ... and then another ..
Bloody hell! Every bike is different. Smooth changes, walnuts in cheddar changes, tip into the roundabout sweetly, won't turn and wants to go straight on, lovely fuelling, tank full of diesel ... Ooooo this one feels good .... Ahhhhhhhhh ... it's my bike .... like comfey old slippers ...... bloody hell, whose is this - it's awful .... and so on. It always amazes me how different every bike is ... (and of course how each rider gets used to his bike and it's little quirks .... ).

:thumb2

And don't forget HOW IT WAS BROKEN IN ...
 
Over dinner in the masonic lodge probably .... :augie
 


Back
Top Bottom