They should actually work but I don't think it would be recommended as they are fog light bulbs and I would say the light pattern would be all over the place if you are using them as your dipped beam.
Indeed - response from shop:
"they have no form of beam pattern or light projection so although they will look good you won't be able to see where you are going."
Ooookay... So £20 buys you an LED bulb with no beam pattern, but the (fundamentally) same bulb with beam pattern costs 3 or 4 time that? Why? Maybe I'm naive or poorly-informed or overly-cynical or all of these, but that seems bogus to me?
These are costly compared to may other LED bulbs BUT quality isn't cheap. The LED element in any fitment might last for 30,000 hours but few bulbs or even full lamps will ever get that far. Something always fails in the system somewhere. In the long run, some initially costly bulbs will be low cost compared to "cheap" alternatives.
Sometimes quality is cheap. And IMO/IME, expensive doesn't always necessarily equate to quality. Friend of mine has a €1000 Fender Strat. Fucker won't stay in tune. For €1000, I'd expect my guitar to stay in tune.
The LED bulb on sale for £80 may the the exact same bulb on sale elsewhere for £20. How does the punter know? Companies sell stuff to make money, not to make punters happy. Now more than ever, punters are terribly gullible and sellers are capitalising on this, to the cost of people who can see the rip-off. I worked in Kinsale for a few months a while back - lovely town, but everything is more expensive than surrounding towns - B&Bs, meals in restaurants, beers, Mars bars. Just because the tourists will pay the prices. So the locals (and visiting workers) have to pay those same high prices.
The notion that expensive always/automatically = quality and cheap always/automatically = rubbish is bullshit. IMO.
This thread about upgrading headlight bulbs is on a forum for bikes that cost what - £10,000 new? More? And they need to have their headlights upgraded by the customer?! FFS! That IMO on some level undermines the "expensive = quality" perception. The reason I asked my question was that I'm considering an 1100GS, notorious for having a shitty headlight. But that's a dated design on a bike at least 17 years old - for under £2000, I'll forgive it having a shitty headlight, and I'll happily include upgrading the headlight in the price I'll pay... But on a bike I paid over £10,000 for? I'd expect it to come as standard with a headlight capable of illuminating the moon.
Bit of an unintentional rant there - soz... Not dissing 1200s, not dissing 1200 owners, not trying to hijack OP's thread - just saying...

