moonhead911
Registered user
my results from full tank to empty iv lost about 30 to 40 miles from a full tank. i would usually get around 190 to 200 miles before the amber light come on
[/URL][/IMG]
JohnGS1100 Tuning Chip
- Thread starter uncle dick
- Start date
Roger 04 RT
Registered user
I haven't tried many different spark plugs, so don't have an opinion. I first tried replacing the stock plugs with a popular Autolite singe-electrode but eventually went back to the stock dual electrode plugs. On the twin spark I went two heat ranges hotter on the bottom plug and found that they ran a little cleaner.
A big thing I learned is that the Motronic MA 2.2 and 2.4 system and coils are very voltage sensitive, any excess starter current draw or increased battery resistance leads to an excess voltage spike during starting. That spike can cause the Motronic to chase its tail and move the timing around for 10-20 seconds while it settles down. (I even temporarily added a second battery to run the Motronic and Coils to prove this.)
Another key to a good-starting Oilhead is that the voltage on the coils (stick coils especially) remains high. This means on some twin-spark models, without the "2nd Load Relay" that you get much smoother engine performance if you rewire the coils through a dedicated relay. I was very surprised after rewiring the coils how much smoother the engine is both at idle and at high-power.
So this and having a sound battery/starter pair seem much more important than the choice of plugs.
My latest hard job :
Dyno results from R1100S.
1999 year model (single spark).
Stock Hp : 86,3 Hp / 7.676 rpms.
Firts trying for test (stage 6 chip) : 92,3 Hp / 7.617 rpms.
Stage 8 chip : 94,6 Hp / 7.478 rpms.
Stage 9 chip : 95,4 Hp / 7.473
The torque goes up to 1 Kgr at all revs of rpms.
At the road the diferent is huge !!
Waiting for consumption..
Dyno results from R1100S.
1999 year model (single spark).
Stock Hp : 86,3 Hp / 7.676 rpms.
Firts trying for test (stage 6 chip) : 92,3 Hp / 7.617 rpms.
Stage 8 chip : 94,6 Hp / 7.478 rpms.
Stage 9 chip : 95,4 Hp / 7.473
The torque goes up to 1 Kgr at all revs of rpms.
At the road the diferent is huge !!
Waiting for consumption..
moonhead911
Registered user
Any ideas why my fuel consumption has gone Up so getting less miles for my fuel
I must send you the stage8 update chip for sure. Send me a pm with details of bike and you fully address please.
Also did you check the color of ccp ?
Also did you check the color of ccp ?
moonhead911
Registered user
Tps is set to 362mv
moonhead911
Registered user
This is the stage 8 chip I have
Did you check sparks, lambda (oxygon sensor) and CCP?
Take a photo please from you fusebox to checking,
Take a photo please from you fusebox to checking,
moonhead911
Registered user
ccp yellow fuse
Jiffy176
Registered user
Hi John.
I have a 2001 R1150 GS with cat and Remus end can and standard air filter, which chip do you recommend please?
Thanks.
Jiff.
I have a 2001 R1150 GS with cat and Remus end can and standard air filter, which chip do you recommend please?
Thanks.
Jiff.
Hi Jiff.
I recommend the stage 8 chip. WIll work great for your bike. More torque and power by the best consumption.
Send me a pm for details please.
moonhead911
Registered user
dont have 400 quid to piss up the wall sorry
Jiffy176
Registered user
John never said to buy one, he meant to say with a GS911
Yes if has a friend to help or a BMW service point.
He was check all of the bikes expect lambda sensor. I think there is the problem.
moonhead911
Registered user
is that what you need jhon
[/URL][/IMG]
[/URL][/IMG]
[/URL][/IMG]
moonhead911
Registered user
I do not know nothing about GS911.
# Roger help please, what did you see ?
# Roger help please, what did you see ?
Roger 04 RT
Registered user
All the GS-911 traces are normal. I will explain them all later this morning. The O2 sensor looks good.
Similar threads
