smoooooth !! accelerator module

These bikes are renowned for their economy. Has anyone reported back on how this is affected? I'm assuming that it richens things up a bit, and that consumption will go up.

Without doubt there will be a increase consumption but its worth it imo.Tick over seams to have gone up a few rpm,but it all hads to that great smooooth ride.To me the bike is more rounded and almost forgot about the lowzy seat.

:roll
 
got mine today, took about 20 minutes to fit ( I did fanny about though)

Easy peasy to fit......

800gs003.jpg


fake tank off first......

800gs002.jpg


Thats the sucker, unplug this and attach your modulator between existing connectors, will only fit on,one way:thumb...........

800gs004.jpg


On advice I purchased the short one. All connected.......

800gs005.jpg


Then all tucked away neatly...ish.

Bike fired up straight away, 1st impression without riding it......well ok really not really noticed any difference but then again was just blipping it for a couple of seconds. Will report soon when I get to ride the thing in anger. Grrrrrrrrrrrr:D

Comes with straight forward instructions and very prompt delivery:clap:thumb2

Richie:beerjug:
 
Guys, how long did your accelerator module take to arrive?

I've been waiting for mine for well over a week now... :-(
 
ordered - 7th March

Posted - 9th March

Arrived - 13th March

Pretty good service as far as I'm concerned :clap

Richie:beerjug:
 
Finally received my accelerator module, smooths out the accelerator no end, especially in lower revs. As for extra torque... I didn't notice much more, but the fuel economy was much easier to maintain and I'm sure it's helped it.

Will have to see what it's like over a longer time period, but so far so good.
 
Module

Come on guys does it make the fuel consumption worse ?

I've done near to 400 miles this weekend at an average of 64mpg, and the hesitation between 1500 and 2800 rpm was doing my head in on bumpy roads. 20 mile from home I filled up the empty tank with 97ron fuel just to see what if !

Yep 90% of the hesitation gone (1st time I've tried the stuff) so looks like my bike is mapped for the £1.41 a litre wallet busting go-go juice :mmmm
 
Come on guys does it make the fuel consumption worse ?

I've done near to 400 miles this weekend at an average of 64mpg, and the hesitation between 1500 and 2800 rpm was doing my head in on bumpy roads. 20 mile from home I filled up the empty tank with 97ron fuel just to see what if !

Yep 90% of the hesitation gone (1st time I've tried the stuff) so looks like my bike is mapped for the £1.41 a litre wallet busting go-go juice :mmmm

No I don't think the module makes the fuel economy worse. Since I fitted the module, a unifilter and Leo Vince Carbon Muffler my economy has gone from 4.7 litres/100Km (60.6 mpg imperial ... why can't you all just go fully metric?) to 4.8 Litres/100Km (59.4 mpg). This is probably due to me riding faster and using the throttle harder ... anyway I doubt that its very significant!
 
Because we don't want to!

I'm glad you have decided not to be partly pregnant as well!

I only meant it as tongue in cheek ... but I do get sick of converting everything into weird archaic imperial measurements so that the citizens of two countries in particular can understand them. Then we have the problem of things like gallons being different in the UK and the US! I still understand imperial miles per gallon, but the experience of dealing with our cousins in North America has shown me that we might as well start dealing with litres as soon as possible.

I wish the Americans would get over pounds as well ... I need to convert them to kilograms to see how heavy something is. Your currency, the pound was once defined as one pound of silver ... as I write the price is £22.09 per troy ounce (still official usage!) or £353.44 per pound ... bit ironic really! Most of this devaluation has come since the invention of central banks like the BOE and the US Federal reserve.

Not to hijack the thread much further, I note that the official measurement of volume in the UK is in fact the litre. I also note that the UK began its metrification in 1967 and Australia in 1969, in that time Australia has become almost entirely metric ... the only thing I don't really like is the measurement of pressure ... we use Kilograms per square meter, bar or millibars. I actually still like PSI, but I am sure I will eventually get over it.

Finally ... (Thank God you say!) we use litres per 100 kilometres, but I note that the dutch use kilometres per litre ... very annoying! As an aside you can calculate mpg (imperial!) to l/100km and vice versa by dividing 284 by the number in question. Example 30mpg in l/100km is 284/30 = 9.5 l/100km. 5l/100 km = 284/5 = 56.8 mpg. Its very easy really. I'm done!

Edit: I did more research and the pound was based on a Troy pound (373 grams) in 1526 so the 1526 £ is currently worth "only" £264.89 ... thats a relief! It was also Sterling silver ... hence "Pounds stirling" which was only 92.5% pure as opposed to fine silver at 99.9%, so adjusting for that we have a pound as originally defined as about £245. Last calulation ... this means that since 1526 the pound has fallen to 0.004 of its value, or that it has lost 99.6% of its value. I'm fascinated, but I promise to shut up now!
 
Last edited:
I'm glad you have decided not to be partly pregnant as well!

I only meant it as tongue in cheek ... but I do get sick of converting everything into weird archaic imperial measurements so that the citizens of two countries in particular can understand them. Then we have the problem of things like gallons being different in the UK and the US! I still understand imperial miles per gallon, but the experience of dealing with our cousins in North America has shown me that we might as well start dealing with litres as soon as possible.

I wish the Americans would get over pounds as well ... I need to convert them to kilograms to see how heavy something is. Your currency, the pound was once defined as one pound of silver ... as I write the price is £22.09 per troy ounce (still official usage!) or £353.44 per pound ... bit ironic really! Most of this devaluation has come since the invention of central banks like the BOE and the US Federal reserve.

Not to hijack the thread much further, I note that the official measurement of volume in the UK is in fact the litre. I also note that the UK began its metrification in 1967 and Australia in 1969, in that time Australia has become almost entirely metric ... the only thing I don't really like is the measurement of pressure ... we use Kilograms per square meter, bar or millibars. I actually still like PSI, but I am sure I will eventually get over it.

Finally ... (Thank God you say!) we use litres per 100 kilometres, but I note that the dutch use kilometres per litre ... very annoying! As an aside you can calculate mpg (imperial!) to l/100km and vice versa by dividing 284 by the number in question. Example 30mpg in l/100km is 284/30 = 9.5 l/100km. 5l/100 km = 284/5 = 56.8 mpg. Its very easy really. I'm done!

Edit: I did more research and the pound was based on a Troy pound (373 grams) in 1526 so the 1526 £ is currently worth "only" £264.89 ... thats a relief! It was also Sterling silver ... hence "Pounds stirling" which was only 92.5% pure as opposed to fine silver at 99.9%, so adjusting for that we have a pound as originally defined as about £245. Last calulation ... this means that since 1526 the pound has fallen to 0.004 of its value, or that it has lost 99.6% of its value. I'm fascinated, but I promise to shut up now!

:eek:You Reeeeeaaalllyyyy need to get out more!:bounce1
 
My accelerator just arrived. I was waiting until after the MOT to install it, wondering if it does anything to the emission levels. I guess it makes the mix richer = more emissions. And whether that takes the bike over the EU emission threshold. Here in Singapore that would be an MOT fail.
 
Good rant, Ducksbane! Loved it! :) I'm metric through and through, imperial annoy me, but you know what they say; "You can't teach pork" ;) :D
 
Just fitted mine to the F800, a bit smoother and less snatchy at low speed and low revs, not much noticeable difference higher up the rev range. Fuel consumptions appears unchanged according to the computer, 58mpg before and after.

A worthwhile addition but not a massive change for me.
 
Fitted yesterday
Rode to work today
Notice no difference at all

Wasted £40 there then :blast
 


Back
Top Bottom