rodsharp
Registered user
Looking to get a detector and probably nailed it down to Road Angel or Snooper. Has anybody experience of these and do they work reliably on fixed and mobile cameras and hand held devices?.
I have generally found my eyes to work perfectly in avoiding Speed Camera's.
Once, in Norway, my pillion was most impressed that whilst we were pinging along at a fair old whack (overtaking a few things as we went), I 'suddenly' lifted off, droped back into the traffic flow and a couple of mph below the 50mph limit.
She thought it was because I had seen the 'plod' with the speed camera (lying prone, behind the hedge at the side of the road). I hadn't, it just felt like a piece of road that for whatever reason shoul be ridden at 50mph.
But if you want an electronic aid, then I heartly recommend NOT using anything TomTom based (they rely on 'customer' info - hundreds of CCTV and Traffic Light Camera's show as Speed Camera's on my TomTom, as do endless '50mph' limits on motorways long after the temporary restriction/roadworks have gone. Also shows camera's on every bridge of M25 from Junction 1 - Junction 15......

I have generally found my eyes to work perfectly in avoiding Speed Camera's.

So your eyes didn't work perfectly on that occasion then!!!![]()
Does that include ones with a possessive case.....?![]()

I think they did. As in I saw that exceeding the speed limit might not be a good idea (not because there was a limit, but because the road conditions etc meant it was not). So my eyes saw a good reason to stick to the posted limit (road conditions, not plod), but then I have never had a problem anywhere with plod/camera etc being placed anywhere that I felt it was safe to plough through in excess of the stated limit.
So I use my eyes to look for indicators of an appropriate speed, and that has always sufficed for me, regardless of whether the things that I saw were a sharp bend or a policeperson with a camera gun.

Sat navs will only show up static camera sites (but not if they are live) and points where someone has noted in the past that there has been a mobile site. Problem comes when on the likes of the m6 where someone sees and traffic flow camera on a bridge thinks its a speed camera and logs its location.
The dedicated detectors will easily pick up the older Muniquip devices before they can get a speed lock BUT from the tests I've seen done with newer Pro Lasers devices etc they struggle to pick them up as they have a greater range than the detectors
Also camera vans will not be picked up nor will average speed cameras.
The answer is don't speed and if you insist on doing so take the consequences of your own actions and don't whinge when you get done for speeding or try to weasel out of it.
On the A1 or M1 heading south you're generally safe driving at the speed of the rest of the faster traffic.So with your logic, does that mean you will only follow the laws that suit you ? So how about Rape or Murder, do they depend on what mood your in ? law is the law, break it and get caught and your fooked, take the consequences and stop fecking bleeting.So because some arseholes get a 50 limit put on a nice quiet stretch of road we all have to obey? For laws to be just they have to be both sensible and have the support of a majority, even that Cameron creep can't just decree it. Where I used to live in the UK 50 limits went in despite opposition from the local police. They will be justified by the same suspect figures used for speed cameras. Statistics quoted by politicians (a breed that has to form parties so that they can get together and have a collective IQ nudging into double figures) and the anti driving lobby, all of whom lack the faintest idea of how to interpret such figures. Say "reduction to mean" to most of them and you wont see a flicker of understanding.
Just feeds the "speed kills" crap that is spouted by the intellectuality challenged. This theory was popular up until the coming of the railways-it was held that a speed faster than that of a galloping horse would be harmful to the human body. Most of us know better now. By focusing on the wrong reason for most accidents we risk ignoring the real problem. Accidents are, in the main, cause by someone not paying enough attention. In a small number of cases this will include driving too fast for the conditions but it is the inattention not the speed that is the culprit.
We are producing a generation of drivers (and some riders, sadly) who smugly think that if they obey the speed limit there are safer than the rest of us. So they go on using their phones, tuning the radio, poking at the Sat Nav and now you are suggesting check a bloody radar detector!
John



So with your logic, does that mean you will only follow the laws that suit you ? So how about Rape or Murder, do they depend on what mood your in ? law is the law, break it and get caught and your fooked, take the consequences and stop fecking bleeting.![]()

)So with your logic, does that mean you will only follow the laws that suit you ? So how about Rape or Murder, do they depend on what mood your in ? law is the law, break it and get caught and your fooked, take the consequences and stop fecking bleeting.![]()