i currently have a gpsmap60csx which replaced a 2610. this is what i like about it:
almost infinitely configurable. huge possibilities for stats, trips etc. in any place i want them.
small. just slips in a pocket when i'm off bike.
battery powered. use it occasionally on other bikes, and don't faff around with wires.
simple mount, that transfers easily between bikes. no wires bolted in at the back of a complex mount.
it's not a zumo.
this what i don't like:
small, dim screen, with poorly contrasting colours (not as shown on garmin website, in fact). didn't factor in failing close up vision when i bought it
slow calculation, slow redraw.
very limited route options. "shortest" or "fastest", and choose fastest, and it conveniently avoids any vias set in the route
but what i hate about it, in fact what makes me want to absolutely dash it's stupid little processor into silicone dust, is the way a route carefully planned in mapsource is necessarily "recalculated" by the unit making it quite different from what i'd planned on the computer
i know i can address the screen issue if i switch to a zumo, and that i'll have to endure the zumo's complicated mount (i don't want audio, mp3, phone, sky etc.), have to look at it's fisher price graphics with a stupid little motorbike wobbling down the road
but i need to know, does a zumo "activate" a route like my old 2610, or "recalculate" ie. stuff it the fcuk up, like my gpsmap does?
i've downloaded the zumo manual, but i'm still not sure. i fear the latter though. in which case, why bother with mapsource at all?
almost infinitely configurable. huge possibilities for stats, trips etc. in any place i want them.
small. just slips in a pocket when i'm off bike.
battery powered. use it occasionally on other bikes, and don't faff around with wires.
simple mount, that transfers easily between bikes. no wires bolted in at the back of a complex mount.
it's not a zumo.
this what i don't like:
small, dim screen, with poorly contrasting colours (not as shown on garmin website, in fact). didn't factor in failing close up vision when i bought it

slow calculation, slow redraw.
very limited route options. "shortest" or "fastest", and choose fastest, and it conveniently avoids any vias set in the route
but what i hate about it, in fact what makes me want to absolutely dash it's stupid little processor into silicone dust, is the way a route carefully planned in mapsource is necessarily "recalculated" by the unit making it quite different from what i'd planned on the computer

i know i can address the screen issue if i switch to a zumo, and that i'll have to endure the zumo's complicated mount (i don't want audio, mp3, phone, sky etc.), have to look at it's fisher price graphics with a stupid little motorbike wobbling down the road
i've downloaded the zumo manual, but i'm still not sure. i fear the latter though. in which case, why bother with mapsource at all?


