And Im pretty sure Ive read the exact opposite - on this very site. people who have had their original shocks refurbed have.. during the course of this procedure had the springs 'checked' and found to be well within tolerances - so no work was necessary on the springs. in short - its all about the internals.
Perhaps you would be better off talking to these people who have had this work done to confirm this. its been going on for years - since some company had the bright idea of brazing on a valve to make refurbing the hitherto disposable shocks possible.
I don't doubt replacing the springs is a good idea in some cases - but it seems to me an unnecessary expense if the original spring is still up to the job.
While I take your point and agree that in some cases a refurb might be an excellent idea, I'm convinced that it wouldn't be feasible for my shock.
As I mentioned earlier, the damping adjuster on my shock is seized (which I've been told By Steptoe is not fixable), the hose linking the remote is chaffed and the spring is rusty in places with peeling powdercoat. While I'm all for repairing where possible, It's almost twenty years old and I think the cost of refurb would be so high that it's just not worth it - its useful life is coming to an end.
So, having made the decision to replace with a HyperPro, I'd like to take the opportunity to tailor the spring rate to match my intended use (usually loaded and often two up and loaded). The progressive springs available from HyperPro mean that I could slightly uprate the spring while retaining good solo unloaded performance.
Hence my question...