Klanky
Registered user
I read of many people who found the late correspondent insulting.
I was never able to see whether he was or not, because I couldn't understand a word of it.
Was it neccessary to write in slang?
As someone who enjoys being in Scotland, & revels in listenig to the local inflections, I found his written missives unintelligible.
Much worse than trying to understand Rab C.
(My son found a was of making Rab C absolutely brilliant. He puts on the subtitles & when one misses a joke, scan them)
Therefore, he may have been insulting, or interesting, but I gave up on them because of their sheer unintelligibilty.
Why shouldn't he write in a Scots dialect? He's a Scotsman posting in a Scots section read by other Scotsmen (and the occasional FEB
).If I went into, say, the North Eastern section and someone was writing in broad Geordie, I'd say I have two options - try and keep up or ignore it...not start asking why Geordies choose to write in their own dialect.
Nobody in the Scots section demands anyone to write in any given format - if Uinneag decides to write in his own style - then so what?






