I thought 1 & 3 were the same, i.e. the one you get with an approved bike is the same as the one you buy yourself and mirrors the original "new" warranty (2) it is very confusing having 3 different warranties, yet claiming they offer the same cover.
Thinking can sometimes be dangerous.
(1) and (3) are ostensibly the same thing. The subtle difference is that (1) Is a voluntary purchase, made by the owner, whilst (3) is given away as a part of the re-sale price by the dealer. It is if you like the dealer's 'guarantee' to the new owner that the bike is sound and will remain reasonably so for the next 12 months, subject to the terms of the policy. Non-franchised dealers may (or may not) offer similar 'guarantees' of course.
Private sellers can offer the same, simply as the original and the BuMW Extended-warranty (if it has been bought) are transferable. Even if it hasn't the new owner may well be able to buy it (or a similar product) subject to certain simple criteria.
Both (1) and (3) are insurance backed products, whilst (2) is simply the original manufacturer's warranty. (1) and (3) do not mirror (2) as they cannot do so. Why not? Well, that's easy. BuMW can - as the original manufacturer - repair or replace the entire vehicle if they chose to, the ultimate 'goodwill' settlement. Why? Well they make the damned things every ten minutes and can do so at cost. That option is not available to an insurer; or rather it is except nobody would pay the premium commensurate with the likely exposure.
Was the original post about these warranties, I thought it had been decided it was another third party warranty. Still confused as if it was BMW warranty (1,2 or 3) surely it should have been a warranty claim and not a goodwill gesture.
What drew you to those two conclusions? What information have you gleaned that support your opinion that it must be a warranty repair in full?
Here is an example: Your house is insured against fire. It burns down. You arrive on UKGSer to say, "My house burned down and the insurer will not pay". Howls of righteous indignation follow. You then reveal, "My house burned down, as I set fire to it myself, and the insurer will not pay".... Not quite the same thing. Do not jump to conclusions without hearing all the story.
I assumed all the BMW warranties would include FD / EWS / FPC, and have been told by delears the AUB / Purchased warranties do.
If you have been told so and can see the items listed in your warranty booklet / policy, then you do not need to assume, surely?
I also thought people here had had FD claims rejected under various BMW warranties, suggesting the dealers are not telling the truth.
There you go.... Thinking again. It does you no good when the thoughts are centred on shonky information or from a pre-determined perspective. See above. Free your mind, and the rest will follow.
If so this really stinks that someone outside of warranty can get an FD as goodwill and someone who has paid £300 to BMW for a warranty gets told to piss off.
....and if it is not so? What then?
I intended to keep up BMW dealer servicing and buy the warranty every year as I do about 6k a year this would set me back @ £600 a year as oppsoed to under £100 if I did servicing myself, is it worth spending an extra £500 a year if I may still have to find £1500 if an FD fails
That is for you to answer. The choice is simple. You can underwrite the risk of an FD failure (or some other insured calamity) yourself for £300 a year (plus dealer service costs) or chose not to. A bod in this thread chose not to and is now unhappy. I chose to and have been happy.
I understand goodwill is more likely to go to people who have full dealer histories, taking your bike elsewhere then expecting BMW to help you when something goes wrong is a bit silly, why not go to whoever last serviced it and ask them to do it for free as they had your last buck. The 25k vs 55k FD issue is easy to understand, without BMW servicing they can (maybe rightly) argue the FD may not have had oil changed.
Good. You understand a significant component of goodwill.
Your suggestion will work just as well for you of course, which may dictate or influence the decision you take as to whether to buy extended warranty and / or do all the servicing yourself (see above)
I think with common failures (i.e. design faults and sub-standard components) like EWS / FPC / FD BMW should have a set policy, maybe 100% payout for under 50k on an FD unit, 50% if over 50k and maybe reduce their contribution if the bike has not kept up BMW servicing. Certainly clarity would help, even if they said no goodwill for non BMW servicing, at least everyone would know where they stand.
There's that think word again. I can only suggest that you direct your thoughts to paper and address them to BuMW.
There appears to be a lot of unhappy owners around here, mostly due to reliability issues and how BMW deal (or don't) with them.
Appearances can be deceptive, especially when one sets out to see them in a particular light.